Cargando…

Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers

The application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis has improved the clinical management of PC patients. However, the PSA assay has been faced with criticism due to its potential association with over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatakeyama, Shingo, Yoneyama, Tohru, Tobisawa, Yuki, Ohyama, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27730440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1049-y
_version_ 1782519472279519232
author Hatakeyama, Shingo
Yoneyama, Tohru
Tobisawa, Yuki
Ohyama, Chikara
author_facet Hatakeyama, Shingo
Yoneyama, Tohru
Tobisawa, Yuki
Ohyama, Chikara
author_sort Hatakeyama, Shingo
collection PubMed
description The application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis has improved the clinical management of PC patients. However, the PSA assay has been faced with criticism due to its potential association with over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment of patients with indolent disease. The United States Preventive Services Task Force incited much debate over PSA-based screening in 2012 by recommending against this approach. However, the PSA assay remains the first-line tool for the early detection of PC. This debate highlights the unmet need for non-invasive PC biomarkers with greater sensitivity and specificity that are capable of distinguishing aggressive disease from indolent disease, predicting treatment response, and guiding treatment decisions. Recent investigations into putative PC biomarkers have focused on PSA isoform assays (prostate health index, 4-kallikurein panel), PC-associated genes in the urine (PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG), glycan-associated biomarkers (S2, 3PSA, GCNT1, and tri- and tetra-antennary serum N-glycans), and circulating tumor cells. Although substantial efforts to identify novel PC biomarkers that might replace PSA have been put forth, the majority of the putative PC biomarkers reported in the last few years are still under investigation or validation. This review provides an overview of the current state of PC biomarker research and focuses on a few promising PC biomarkers in development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5378754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53787542017-04-17 Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers Hatakeyama, Shingo Yoneyama, Tohru Tobisawa, Yuki Ohyama, Chikara Int J Clin Oncol Invited Review Article The application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis has improved the clinical management of PC patients. However, the PSA assay has been faced with criticism due to its potential association with over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment of patients with indolent disease. The United States Preventive Services Task Force incited much debate over PSA-based screening in 2012 by recommending against this approach. However, the PSA assay remains the first-line tool for the early detection of PC. This debate highlights the unmet need for non-invasive PC biomarkers with greater sensitivity and specificity that are capable of distinguishing aggressive disease from indolent disease, predicting treatment response, and guiding treatment decisions. Recent investigations into putative PC biomarkers have focused on PSA isoform assays (prostate health index, 4-kallikurein panel), PC-associated genes in the urine (PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG), glycan-associated biomarkers (S2, 3PSA, GCNT1, and tri- and tetra-antennary serum N-glycans), and circulating tumor cells. Although substantial efforts to identify novel PC biomarkers that might replace PSA have been put forth, the majority of the putative PC biomarkers reported in the last few years are still under investigation or validation. This review provides an overview of the current state of PC biomarker research and focuses on a few promising PC biomarkers in development. Springer Japan 2016-10-11 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5378754/ /pubmed/27730440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1049-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Invited Review Article
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Yoneyama, Tohru
Tobisawa, Yuki
Ohyama, Chikara
Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
title Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
title_full Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
title_fullStr Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
title_short Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
title_sort recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
topic Invited Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27730440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1049-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hatakeyamashingo recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers
AT yoneyamatohru recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers
AT tobisawayuki recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers
AT ohyamachikara recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers