Cargando…
Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
The application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis has improved the clinical management of PC patients. However, the PSA assay has been faced with criticism due to its potential association with over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27730440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1049-y |
_version_ | 1782519472279519232 |
---|---|
author | Hatakeyama, Shingo Yoneyama, Tohru Tobisawa, Yuki Ohyama, Chikara |
author_facet | Hatakeyama, Shingo Yoneyama, Tohru Tobisawa, Yuki Ohyama, Chikara |
author_sort | Hatakeyama, Shingo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis has improved the clinical management of PC patients. However, the PSA assay has been faced with criticism due to its potential association with over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment of patients with indolent disease. The United States Preventive Services Task Force incited much debate over PSA-based screening in 2012 by recommending against this approach. However, the PSA assay remains the first-line tool for the early detection of PC. This debate highlights the unmet need for non-invasive PC biomarkers with greater sensitivity and specificity that are capable of distinguishing aggressive disease from indolent disease, predicting treatment response, and guiding treatment decisions. Recent investigations into putative PC biomarkers have focused on PSA isoform assays (prostate health index, 4-kallikurein panel), PC-associated genes in the urine (PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG), glycan-associated biomarkers (S2, 3PSA, GCNT1, and tri- and tetra-antennary serum N-glycans), and circulating tumor cells. Although substantial efforts to identify novel PC biomarkers that might replace PSA have been put forth, the majority of the putative PC biomarkers reported in the last few years are still under investigation or validation. This review provides an overview of the current state of PC biomarker research and focuses on a few promising PC biomarkers in development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5378754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53787542017-04-17 Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers Hatakeyama, Shingo Yoneyama, Tohru Tobisawa, Yuki Ohyama, Chikara Int J Clin Oncol Invited Review Article The application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis has improved the clinical management of PC patients. However, the PSA assay has been faced with criticism due to its potential association with over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment of patients with indolent disease. The United States Preventive Services Task Force incited much debate over PSA-based screening in 2012 by recommending against this approach. However, the PSA assay remains the first-line tool for the early detection of PC. This debate highlights the unmet need for non-invasive PC biomarkers with greater sensitivity and specificity that are capable of distinguishing aggressive disease from indolent disease, predicting treatment response, and guiding treatment decisions. Recent investigations into putative PC biomarkers have focused on PSA isoform assays (prostate health index, 4-kallikurein panel), PC-associated genes in the urine (PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG), glycan-associated biomarkers (S2, 3PSA, GCNT1, and tri- and tetra-antennary serum N-glycans), and circulating tumor cells. Although substantial efforts to identify novel PC biomarkers that might replace PSA have been put forth, the majority of the putative PC biomarkers reported in the last few years are still under investigation or validation. This review provides an overview of the current state of PC biomarker research and focuses on a few promising PC biomarkers in development. Springer Japan 2016-10-11 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5378754/ /pubmed/27730440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1049-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Article Hatakeyama, Shingo Yoneyama, Tohru Tobisawa, Yuki Ohyama, Chikara Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
title | Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
title_full | Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
title_short | Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
title_sort | recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers |
topic | Invited Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27730440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1049-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatakeyamashingo recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers AT yoneyamatohru recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers AT tobisawayuki recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers AT ohyamachikara recentprogressandperspectivesonprostatecancerbiomarkers |