Cargando…

Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study

BACKGROUND: Tight control of blood glucose concentration in people with type 1 diabetes predisposes to hypoglycaemia. We aimed to investigate whether day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery can improve glucose control while alleviating the risk of hypoglycaemia in adults with HbA(1c) below...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bally, Lia, Thabit, Hood, Kojzar, Harald, Mader, Julia K, Qerimi-Hyseni, Jehona, Hartnell, Sara, Tauschmann, Martin, Allen, Janet M, Wilinska, Malgorzata E, Pieber, Thomas R, Evans, Mark L, Hovorka, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Lancet, Diabetes & Endocrinology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30001-3
_version_ 1782519570161991680
author Bally, Lia
Thabit, Hood
Kojzar, Harald
Mader, Julia K
Qerimi-Hyseni, Jehona
Hartnell, Sara
Tauschmann, Martin
Allen, Janet M
Wilinska, Malgorzata E
Pieber, Thomas R
Evans, Mark L
Hovorka, Roman
author_facet Bally, Lia
Thabit, Hood
Kojzar, Harald
Mader, Julia K
Qerimi-Hyseni, Jehona
Hartnell, Sara
Tauschmann, Martin
Allen, Janet M
Wilinska, Malgorzata E
Pieber, Thomas R
Evans, Mark L
Hovorka, Roman
author_sort Bally, Lia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tight control of blood glucose concentration in people with type 1 diabetes predisposes to hypoglycaemia. We aimed to investigate whether day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery can improve glucose control while alleviating the risk of hypoglycaemia in adults with HbA(1c) below 7·5% (58 mmol/mol). METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, crossover study, we recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes and HbA(1c) below 7·5% from Addenbrooke's Hospital (Cambridge, UK) and Medical University of Graz (Graz, Austria). After a 2–4 week run-in period, participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using web-based randomly permuted blocks of four, to receive insulin via the day-and-night hybrid closed-loop system or usual pump therapy for 4 weeks, followed by a 2–4 week washout period and then the other intervention for 4 weeks. Treatment interventions were unsupervised and done under free-living conditions. During the closed-loop period, a model-predictive control algorithm directed insulin delivery, and prandial insulin delivery was calculated with a standard bolus wizard. The primary outcome was the proportion of time when sensor glucose concentration was in target range (3·9–10·0 mmol/L) over the 4 week study period. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02727231, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between March 21 and June 24, 2016, we recruited 31 participants, of whom 29 were randomised. One participant withdrew during the first closed-loop period because of dissatisfaction with study devices and glucose control. The proportion of time when sensor glucose concentration was in target range was 10·5 percentage points higher (95% CI 7·6–13·4; p<0·0001) during closed-loop delivery compared with usual pump therapy (65·6% [SD 8·1] when participants used usual pump therapy vs 76·2% [6·4] when they used closed-loop). Compared with usual pump therapy, closed-loop delivery also reduced the proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia: the proportion of time with glucose concentration below 3·5 mmol/L was reduced by 65% (53–74, p<0·0001) and below 2·8 mmol/L by 76% (59–86, p<0·0001). No episodes of serious hypoglycaemia or other serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: Use of day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery under unsupervised, free-living conditions for 4 weeks in adults with type 1 diabetes and HbA(1c) below 7·5% is safe and well tolerated, improves glucose control, and reduces hypoglycaemia burden. Larger and longer studies are warranted. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation (P1BEP3_165297), JDRF, UK National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, and Wellcome Strategic Award (100574/Z/12/Z).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5379244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Lancet, Diabetes & Endocrinology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53792442017-04-07 Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study Bally, Lia Thabit, Hood Kojzar, Harald Mader, Julia K Qerimi-Hyseni, Jehona Hartnell, Sara Tauschmann, Martin Allen, Janet M Wilinska, Malgorzata E Pieber, Thomas R Evans, Mark L Hovorka, Roman Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Articles BACKGROUND: Tight control of blood glucose concentration in people with type 1 diabetes predisposes to hypoglycaemia. We aimed to investigate whether day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery can improve glucose control while alleviating the risk of hypoglycaemia in adults with HbA(1c) below 7·5% (58 mmol/mol). METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, crossover study, we recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes and HbA(1c) below 7·5% from Addenbrooke's Hospital (Cambridge, UK) and Medical University of Graz (Graz, Austria). After a 2–4 week run-in period, participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using web-based randomly permuted blocks of four, to receive insulin via the day-and-night hybrid closed-loop system or usual pump therapy for 4 weeks, followed by a 2–4 week washout period and then the other intervention for 4 weeks. Treatment interventions were unsupervised and done under free-living conditions. During the closed-loop period, a model-predictive control algorithm directed insulin delivery, and prandial insulin delivery was calculated with a standard bolus wizard. The primary outcome was the proportion of time when sensor glucose concentration was in target range (3·9–10·0 mmol/L) over the 4 week study period. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02727231, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between March 21 and June 24, 2016, we recruited 31 participants, of whom 29 were randomised. One participant withdrew during the first closed-loop period because of dissatisfaction with study devices and glucose control. The proportion of time when sensor glucose concentration was in target range was 10·5 percentage points higher (95% CI 7·6–13·4; p<0·0001) during closed-loop delivery compared with usual pump therapy (65·6% [SD 8·1] when participants used usual pump therapy vs 76·2% [6·4] when they used closed-loop). Compared with usual pump therapy, closed-loop delivery also reduced the proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia: the proportion of time with glucose concentration below 3·5 mmol/L was reduced by 65% (53–74, p<0·0001) and below 2·8 mmol/L by 76% (59–86, p<0·0001). No episodes of serious hypoglycaemia or other serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: Use of day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery under unsupervised, free-living conditions for 4 weeks in adults with type 1 diabetes and HbA(1c) below 7·5% is safe and well tolerated, improves glucose control, and reduces hypoglycaemia burden. Larger and longer studies are warranted. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation (P1BEP3_165297), JDRF, UK National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, and Wellcome Strategic Award (100574/Z/12/Z). The Lancet, Diabetes & Endocrinology 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5379244/ /pubmed/28094136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30001-3 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Bally, Lia
Thabit, Hood
Kojzar, Harald
Mader, Julia K
Qerimi-Hyseni, Jehona
Hartnell, Sara
Tauschmann, Martin
Allen, Janet M
Wilinska, Malgorzata E
Pieber, Thomas R
Evans, Mark L
Hovorka, Roman
Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
title Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
title_full Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
title_fullStr Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
title_short Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
title_sort day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30001-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ballylia dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT thabithood dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT kojzarharald dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT maderjuliak dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT qerimihysenijehona dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT hartnellsara dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT tauschmannmartin dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT allenjanetm dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT wilinskamalgorzatae dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT pieberthomasr dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT evansmarkl dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT hovorkaroman dayandnightglycaemiccontrolwithclosedloopinsulindeliveryversusconventionalinsulinpumptherapyinfreelivingadultswithwellcontrolledtype1diabetesanopenlabelrandomisedcrossoverstudy