Cargando…

Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols

BACKGROUND: To investigate the reproducibility of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurement in normal eyes determined by different operators and two different raster scanning protocols of Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). METHODS: One hundr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xiaoyu, Guo, Xinxing, Xiao, Hui, Mi, Lan, Chen, Xiangxi, Liu, Xing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0434-2
_version_ 1782519646408146944
author Xu, Xiaoyu
Guo, Xinxing
Xiao, Hui
Mi, Lan
Chen, Xiangxi
Liu, Xing
author_facet Xu, Xiaoyu
Guo, Xinxing
Xiao, Hui
Mi, Lan
Chen, Xiangxi
Liu, Xing
author_sort Xu, Xiaoyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the reproducibility of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurement in normal eyes determined by different operators and two different raster scanning protocols of Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). METHODS: One hundred and two eyes of 102 normal subjects were scanned three times using Cirrus HD-OCT with Macular Cube 512 × 128 protocol by two operators, respectively. Three extra scans were obtained using Macular Cube 200 × 200 protocol. The average, minimum, superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal GCIPL thickness was measured. The reproducibility of the measurements was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoV). RESULTS: The intra-operator ICCs of macular GCIPL thickness were >0.875; and the inter-operator ICCs were 0.882 to 0.991. The intra-protocol ICCs of Macular Cube 512 × 128 and 200 × 200 protocol were 0.953 to 0.987 and 0.953 to 0.991, respectively; and the inter-protocol ICCs were 0.876 to 0.991. All CoVs were <1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrus HD-OCT can measure macular GCIPL thickness in normal eyes with excellent reproducibility. The measurements determined by Macular Cube 512 × 128 and 200 × 200 protocol were highly consistent and both protocols were eligible for macular GCIPL thickness measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5379644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53796442017-04-07 Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols Xu, Xiaoyu Guo, Xinxing Xiao, Hui Mi, Lan Chen, Xiangxi Liu, Xing BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the reproducibility of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurement in normal eyes determined by different operators and two different raster scanning protocols of Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). METHODS: One hundred and two eyes of 102 normal subjects were scanned three times using Cirrus HD-OCT with Macular Cube 512 × 128 protocol by two operators, respectively. Three extra scans were obtained using Macular Cube 200 × 200 protocol. The average, minimum, superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal GCIPL thickness was measured. The reproducibility of the measurements was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoV). RESULTS: The intra-operator ICCs of macular GCIPL thickness were >0.875; and the inter-operator ICCs were 0.882 to 0.991. The intra-protocol ICCs of Macular Cube 512 × 128 and 200 × 200 protocol were 0.953 to 0.987 and 0.953 to 0.991, respectively; and the inter-protocol ICCs were 0.876 to 0.991. All CoVs were <1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrus HD-OCT can measure macular GCIPL thickness in normal eyes with excellent reproducibility. The measurements determined by Macular Cube 512 × 128 and 200 × 200 protocol were highly consistent and both protocols were eligible for macular GCIPL thickness measurement. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5379644/ /pubmed/28376748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0434-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Xiaoyu
Guo, Xinxing
Xiao, Hui
Mi, Lan
Chen, Xiangxi
Liu, Xing
Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols
title Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols
title_full Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols
title_fullStr Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols
title_short Reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different OCT scanning protocols
title_sort reproducibility of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal eyes determined by two different oct scanning protocols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0434-2
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiaoyu reproducibilityofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormaleyesdeterminedbytwodifferentoctscanningprotocols
AT guoxinxing reproducibilityofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormaleyesdeterminedbytwodifferentoctscanningprotocols
AT xiaohui reproducibilityofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormaleyesdeterminedbytwodifferentoctscanningprotocols
AT milan reproducibilityofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormaleyesdeterminedbytwodifferentoctscanningprotocols
AT chenxiangxi reproducibilityofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormaleyesdeterminedbytwodifferentoctscanningprotocols
AT liuxing reproducibilityofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormaleyesdeterminedbytwodifferentoctscanningprotocols