Cargando…

The stratification of patient risk depending on the size and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to identify the clinical significances of the size of metastatic lymph node (mLN) and LN ratio (LNR) and to attempt to create a risk stratification for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients. METHODS: We investigated the 435 PTC patients who underwent radi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Young Ran, Lee, So Hee, Lim, Dong Jun, Kim, Min Hee, Jung, Chan Kwon, Chae, Byung Joo, Song, Byung Joo, Bae, Ja Seong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1141-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to identify the clinical significances of the size of metastatic lymph node (mLN) and LN ratio (LNR) and to attempt to create a risk stratification for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients. METHODS: We investigated the 435 PTC patients who underwent radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation treatment following thyroid surgery. The patients were classified into two groups (micrometastasis (pN1mic) ≤ 0.2 cm and macrometastasis (pN1mac) > 0.2 cm) and were stratified into the following three risk groups: group I (pN1mic, LNR ≤ 0.5); group II (pN1mic, LNR > 0.5 or pN1mac, LNR ≤ 0.5); and group III (pN1mac with LNR > 0.5). And then we investigated the association of the classified groups and variable clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics such as large tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, higher T stage, and greater number of mLN or LNR were significantly associated with pN1mac. The mean stimulated thyroglobulin levels were increased with the patient risk groups (p = 0.02). The recurrence-free survivals were significantly different between the stratified groups (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The patient groups I, II, and III may be referred to as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Clinicians should consider the possibility of recurrence, and the decisions about the application of RAI ablation based on the size of mLN and the patient’s risk groups.