Cargando…

The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples

BACKGROUND: Short and valid instruments for measuring factors facilitating or hindering implementation efforts are called for. This article describes (1) the adaptation of a shorter version of the Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-50 items), and (2) the psychometric properties of the sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rye, Marte, Torres, Elisa M., Friborg, Oddgeir, Skre, Ingunn, Aarons, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28372587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0
_version_ 1782519664015835136
author Rye, Marte
Torres, Elisa M.
Friborg, Oddgeir
Skre, Ingunn
Aarons, Gregory A.
author_facet Rye, Marte
Torres, Elisa M.
Friborg, Oddgeir
Skre, Ingunn
Aarons, Gregory A.
author_sort Rye, Marte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Short and valid instruments for measuring factors facilitating or hindering implementation efforts are called for. This article describes (1) the adaptation of a shorter version of the Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-50 items), and (2) the psychometric properties of the shortened version in both US and Norwegian data. METHODS: The US participants were mental health service providers (N = 418) recruited from clinics providing mental health services in San Diego County, California. The Norwegian participants were psychologists, psychiatric nurses, and psychology students (N = 838) recruited from the Norwegian Psychological Association and the Norwegian Nurses Organization. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach was used. RESULTS: The reduction resulted in 36 items named EBPAS-36, and the original 12 factor model was maintained. The EBPAS-36 had acceptable model fit, as indicated by a low degree of misspecification errors in both the US (RMSEA = .045 (CI(90%) .040–.049); SRMR = .05) and the Norwegian data (RMSEA = .052 (CI(90%) .047–.056, SRMR = .07). Incremental model fit was fair in the US (CFI = .93, TLI = .91) and in the Norwegian samples (CFI = .91, TLI = .89). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) in the US and the Norwegian samples were good for the total EBPAS-36 score (.79 and .86, respectively) and were ranged from adequate to excellent for the subscales (US .60–.91 and Norway .61–.92). CONCLUSIONS: The EBPAS-36 has adequate psychometric properties both in US and Norwegian samples, hence indicating cross-cultural validity. It is a brief, pragmatic, and more user-friendly instrument than the EBPAS-50, yet maintains a broad scope by retaining the original 12 measurement domains. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5379724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53797242017-04-10 The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples Rye, Marte Torres, Elisa M. Friborg, Oddgeir Skre, Ingunn Aarons, Gregory A. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Short and valid instruments for measuring factors facilitating or hindering implementation efforts are called for. This article describes (1) the adaptation of a shorter version of the Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-50 items), and (2) the psychometric properties of the shortened version in both US and Norwegian data. METHODS: The US participants were mental health service providers (N = 418) recruited from clinics providing mental health services in San Diego County, California. The Norwegian participants were psychologists, psychiatric nurses, and psychology students (N = 838) recruited from the Norwegian Psychological Association and the Norwegian Nurses Organization. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach was used. RESULTS: The reduction resulted in 36 items named EBPAS-36, and the original 12 factor model was maintained. The EBPAS-36 had acceptable model fit, as indicated by a low degree of misspecification errors in both the US (RMSEA = .045 (CI(90%) .040–.049); SRMR = .05) and the Norwegian data (RMSEA = .052 (CI(90%) .047–.056, SRMR = .07). Incremental model fit was fair in the US (CFI = .93, TLI = .91) and in the Norwegian samples (CFI = .91, TLI = .89). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) in the US and the Norwegian samples were good for the total EBPAS-36 score (.79 and .86, respectively) and were ranged from adequate to excellent for the subscales (US .60–.91 and Norway .61–.92). CONCLUSIONS: The EBPAS-36 has adequate psychometric properties both in US and Norwegian samples, hence indicating cross-cultural validity. It is a brief, pragmatic, and more user-friendly instrument than the EBPAS-50, yet maintains a broad scope by retaining the original 12 measurement domains. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5379724/ /pubmed/28372587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rye, Marte
Torres, Elisa M.
Friborg, Oddgeir
Skre, Ingunn
Aarons, Gregory A.
The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples
title The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples
title_full The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples
title_fullStr The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples
title_full_unstemmed The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples
title_short The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples
title_sort evidence-based practice attitude scale-36 (ebpas-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in us and norwegian samples
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28372587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ryemarte theevidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT torreselisam theevidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT friborgoddgeir theevidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT skreingunn theevidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT aaronsgregorya theevidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT ryemarte evidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT torreselisam evidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT friborgoddgeir evidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT skreingunn evidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples
AT aaronsgregorya evidencebasedpracticeattitudescale36ebpas36abriefandpragmaticmeasureofattitudestoevidencebasedpracticevalidatedinusandnorwegiansamples