Cargando…

Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy

BACKGROUND: Several countries have co-located General Practitioners (GPs) in Primary Care Centres (PCCs) with other health and social care professionals in order to improve integrated care. It is not clear whether the co-location of a multidisciplinary team actually facilitates a positive patient ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonciani, Manila, Barsanti, Sara, Murante, Anna Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2187-2
_version_ 1782519669860597760
author Bonciani, Manila
Barsanti, Sara
Murante, Anna Maria
author_facet Bonciani, Manila
Barsanti, Sara
Murante, Anna Maria
author_sort Bonciani, Manila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several countries have co-located General Practitioners (GPs) in Primary Care Centres (PCCs) with other health and social care professionals in order to improve integrated care. It is not clear whether the co-location of a multidisciplinary team actually facilitates a positive patient experience concerning GP care. The aim of this study was to verify whether the co-location of GPs in PCCs is associated positively with patient satisfaction with their GP when patients have experience of a multidisciplinary team. We also investigated whether patients who frequently use health services, due to their complex needs, benefitted the most from the co-location of a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: The study used data from a population survey carried out in Tuscany (central Italy) at the beginning of 2015 to evaluate the patients’ experience and satisfaction with their GPs. Multilevel linear regression models were implemented to verify the relationship between patient satisfaction and co-location. This key explanatory variable was measured by considering both the list of GPs working in PCCs and the answers of surveyed patients who had experienced the co-location of their GP in a multidisciplinary team. We also explored the effect modification on patient satisfaction due to the use of hospitalisation, access to emergency departments and visits with specialists, by performing the multilevel modelling on two strata of patient data: frequent and non-frequent health service users. RESULTS: A sample of 2025 GP patients were included in the study, 757 of which were patients of GPs working in a PCC. Patient satisfaction with their GP was generally positive. Results showed that having a GP working within a PCC and the experience of the co-located multidisciplinary team were associated with a higher satisfaction (p < 0.01). For non-frequent users of health services on the other hand, the co-location of multidisciplinary team in PCCs was not significantly associated with patient satisfaction, whereas for frequent users, the strength of relationships identified in the overall model increased (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The co-location of GPs with other professionals and their joint working as experienced in PCCs seems to represent a greater benefit for patients, especially for those with complex needs who use primary care, hospitals, emergency care and specialized care frequently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5379750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53797502017-04-10 Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy Bonciani, Manila Barsanti, Sara Murante, Anna Maria BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Several countries have co-located General Practitioners (GPs) in Primary Care Centres (PCCs) with other health and social care professionals in order to improve integrated care. It is not clear whether the co-location of a multidisciplinary team actually facilitates a positive patient experience concerning GP care. The aim of this study was to verify whether the co-location of GPs in PCCs is associated positively with patient satisfaction with their GP when patients have experience of a multidisciplinary team. We also investigated whether patients who frequently use health services, due to their complex needs, benefitted the most from the co-location of a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: The study used data from a population survey carried out in Tuscany (central Italy) at the beginning of 2015 to evaluate the patients’ experience and satisfaction with their GPs. Multilevel linear regression models were implemented to verify the relationship between patient satisfaction and co-location. This key explanatory variable was measured by considering both the list of GPs working in PCCs and the answers of surveyed patients who had experienced the co-location of their GP in a multidisciplinary team. We also explored the effect modification on patient satisfaction due to the use of hospitalisation, access to emergency departments and visits with specialists, by performing the multilevel modelling on two strata of patient data: frequent and non-frequent health service users. RESULTS: A sample of 2025 GP patients were included in the study, 757 of which were patients of GPs working in a PCC. Patient satisfaction with their GP was generally positive. Results showed that having a GP working within a PCC and the experience of the co-located multidisciplinary team were associated with a higher satisfaction (p < 0.01). For non-frequent users of health services on the other hand, the co-location of multidisciplinary team in PCCs was not significantly associated with patient satisfaction, whereas for frequent users, the strength of relationships identified in the overall model increased (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The co-location of GPs with other professionals and their joint working as experienced in PCCs seems to represent a greater benefit for patients, especially for those with complex needs who use primary care, hospitals, emergency care and specialized care frequently. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5379750/ /pubmed/28376886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2187-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bonciani, Manila
Barsanti, Sara
Murante, Anna Maria
Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
title Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
title_full Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
title_fullStr Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
title_short Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
title_sort is the co-location of gps in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? evidence from a population survey in italy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2187-2
work_keys_str_mv AT boncianimanila isthecolocationofgpsinprimarycarecentresassociatedwithahigherpatientsatisfactionevidencefromapopulationsurveyinitaly
AT barsantisara isthecolocationofgpsinprimarycarecentresassociatedwithahigherpatientsatisfactionevidencefromapopulationsurveyinitaly
AT muranteannamaria isthecolocationofgpsinprimarycarecentresassociatedwithahigherpatientsatisfactionevidencefromapopulationsurveyinitaly