Cargando…

Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?

BACKGROUND: The effect of heat in endoscopic instruments used for laparoscopy and hysteroscopy has been well-studied. Reports of thermal injury from nasal endoscopes have also been reported. However, there are no experimental studies, which have objectively documented and provided recommendations fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panigrahi, Manas, Gupta, Bharat, Reddy, Rajesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28413526
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.145567
_version_ 1782519680861208576
author Panigrahi, Manas
Gupta, Bharat
Reddy, Rajesh
author_facet Panigrahi, Manas
Gupta, Bharat
Reddy, Rajesh
author_sort Panigrahi, Manas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of heat in endoscopic instruments used for laparoscopy and hysteroscopy has been well-studied. Reports of thermal injury from nasal endoscopes have also been reported. However, there are no experimental studies, which have objectively documented and provided recommendations for safe use of endoscopes in neurosurgery. OBJECTIVES: To study the heat generated at the tip of the endoscope and the subsequent thermal damage caused to a cotton drape placed in proximity, by varying the intensity of light delivered through different optical cables, ambient (operating room) temperatures and working distances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in the operation theater using a 300 watt xenon light source connected to the endoscope with 3.5 mm and 4.8 mm optical cables. A digital thermometer was used to record the heat generated at the tip of the endoscope. RESULTS: The heat generated at the tip of the endoscope reached its peak in the first 6 min and attained a plateau at 15 min after turning on a light source of 60% intensity. Thermal injury to the cotton drape took a longer time with a 3.8 mm cable compared with 4.8 mm cable. The heat generated at the tip of the endoscope, and thereby the thermal injury caused was found to be lower when the ambient temperature was close to 20°C. CONCLUSIONS: Complications related to thermal injuries caused by heat generated at the tip of an endoscope can be reduced by using a smaller diameter cable, light intensity of 60%, increasing the working distance (as permissible), reducing the time spent for dissection while keeping the endoscope very close to the target and lowering the ambient temperature to 20°C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5379797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53797972017-04-14 Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe? Panigrahi, Manas Gupta, Bharat Reddy, Rajesh Asian J Neurosurg Original Article BACKGROUND: The effect of heat in endoscopic instruments used for laparoscopy and hysteroscopy has been well-studied. Reports of thermal injury from nasal endoscopes have also been reported. However, there are no experimental studies, which have objectively documented and provided recommendations for safe use of endoscopes in neurosurgery. OBJECTIVES: To study the heat generated at the tip of the endoscope and the subsequent thermal damage caused to a cotton drape placed in proximity, by varying the intensity of light delivered through different optical cables, ambient (operating room) temperatures and working distances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in the operation theater using a 300 watt xenon light source connected to the endoscope with 3.5 mm and 4.8 mm optical cables. A digital thermometer was used to record the heat generated at the tip of the endoscope. RESULTS: The heat generated at the tip of the endoscope reached its peak in the first 6 min and attained a plateau at 15 min after turning on a light source of 60% intensity. Thermal injury to the cotton drape took a longer time with a 3.8 mm cable compared with 4.8 mm cable. The heat generated at the tip of the endoscope, and thereby the thermal injury caused was found to be lower when the ambient temperature was close to 20°C. CONCLUSIONS: Complications related to thermal injuries caused by heat generated at the tip of an endoscope can be reduced by using a smaller diameter cable, light intensity of 60%, increasing the working distance (as permissible), reducing the time spent for dissection while keeping the endoscope very close to the target and lowering the ambient temperature to 20°C. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5379797/ /pubmed/28413526 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.145567 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Panigrahi, Manas
Gupta, Bharat
Reddy, Rajesh
Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?
title Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?
title_full Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?
title_fullStr Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?
title_full_unstemmed Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?
title_short Neuroendoscopy - Is it safe?
title_sort neuroendoscopy - is it safe?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28413526
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.145567
work_keys_str_mv AT panigrahimanas neuroendoscopyisitsafe
AT guptabharat neuroendoscopyisitsafe
AT reddyrajesh neuroendoscopyisitsafe