Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety (primary objective) and efficacy of increasing doses (400 U up to 800 U) of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) for patients with limb spasticity. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm, dose-titration study (NCT01603459), patients (18–80 years) wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wissel, Jörg, Bensmail, Djamel, Ferreira, Joaquim J., Molteni, Franco, Satkunam, Lalith, Moraleda, Susana, Rekand, Tiina, McGuire, John, Scheschonka, Astrid, Flatau-Baqué, Birgit, Simon, Olivier, Rochford, Edward T.J., Dressler, Dirk, Simpson, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28283596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003789
_version_ 1782519707102871552
author Wissel, Jörg
Bensmail, Djamel
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Molteni, Franco
Satkunam, Lalith
Moraleda, Susana
Rekand, Tiina
McGuire, John
Scheschonka, Astrid
Flatau-Baqué, Birgit
Simon, Olivier
Rochford, Edward T.J.
Dressler, Dirk
Simpson, David M.
author_facet Wissel, Jörg
Bensmail, Djamel
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Molteni, Franco
Satkunam, Lalith
Moraleda, Susana
Rekand, Tiina
McGuire, John
Scheschonka, Astrid
Flatau-Baqué, Birgit
Simon, Olivier
Rochford, Edward T.J.
Dressler, Dirk
Simpson, David M.
author_sort Wissel, Jörg
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety (primary objective) and efficacy of increasing doses (400 U up to 800 U) of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) for patients with limb spasticity. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm, dose-titration study (NCT01603459), patients (18–80 years) with spasticity due to cerebral causes, who were clinically deemed to require total doses of 800 U incobotulinumtoxinA, received 3 consecutive injection cycles (ICs) with 400 U, 600 U, and 600–800 U incobotulinumtoxinA, respectively, each followed by 12–16 weeks' observation. Outcomes included adverse events (AEs), antibody testing, Resistance to Passive Movement Scale (REPAS; based on the Ashworth Scale), and Goal Attainment Scale. RESULTS: In total, 155 patients were enrolled. IncobotulinumtoxinA dose escalation did not lead to an increased incidence of treatment-related AEs (IC1: 4.5%; IC2: 5.3%; IC3: 2.9%). No treatment-related serious AEs occurred. The most frequent AEs overall were falls (7.7%), nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, and diarrhea (6.5% each). Five patients (3.2%) discontinued due to AEs. No patient developed secondary nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies. Mean (SD) REPAS score improvements from each injection to 4 weeks postinjection increased throughout the study (IC1: −4.6 [3.9]; IC2: −5.9 [4.2]; IC3: −7.1 [4.8]; p < 0.0001 for all). The proportion of patients achieving ≥3 (of 4) treatment goals also increased (IC1: 25.2%; IC2: 50.7%; IC3: 68.6%). CONCLUSION: Escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400 U up to 800 U) did not compromise safety or tolerability, enabled treatment in a greater number of muscles/spasticity patterns, and was associated with increased treatment efficacy, improved muscle tone, and goal attainment. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01603459. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that, for patients with limb spasticity, escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400 U up to 800 U) increases treatment efficacy without compromising safety or tolerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5379931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53799312017-04-07 Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study Wissel, Jörg Bensmail, Djamel Ferreira, Joaquim J. Molteni, Franco Satkunam, Lalith Moraleda, Susana Rekand, Tiina McGuire, John Scheschonka, Astrid Flatau-Baqué, Birgit Simon, Olivier Rochford, Edward T.J. Dressler, Dirk Simpson, David M. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety (primary objective) and efficacy of increasing doses (400 U up to 800 U) of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) for patients with limb spasticity. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm, dose-titration study (NCT01603459), patients (18–80 years) with spasticity due to cerebral causes, who were clinically deemed to require total doses of 800 U incobotulinumtoxinA, received 3 consecutive injection cycles (ICs) with 400 U, 600 U, and 600–800 U incobotulinumtoxinA, respectively, each followed by 12–16 weeks' observation. Outcomes included adverse events (AEs), antibody testing, Resistance to Passive Movement Scale (REPAS; based on the Ashworth Scale), and Goal Attainment Scale. RESULTS: In total, 155 patients were enrolled. IncobotulinumtoxinA dose escalation did not lead to an increased incidence of treatment-related AEs (IC1: 4.5%; IC2: 5.3%; IC3: 2.9%). No treatment-related serious AEs occurred. The most frequent AEs overall were falls (7.7%), nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, and diarrhea (6.5% each). Five patients (3.2%) discontinued due to AEs. No patient developed secondary nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies. Mean (SD) REPAS score improvements from each injection to 4 weeks postinjection increased throughout the study (IC1: −4.6 [3.9]; IC2: −5.9 [4.2]; IC3: −7.1 [4.8]; p < 0.0001 for all). The proportion of patients achieving ≥3 (of 4) treatment goals also increased (IC1: 25.2%; IC2: 50.7%; IC3: 68.6%). CONCLUSION: Escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400 U up to 800 U) did not compromise safety or tolerability, enabled treatment in a greater number of muscles/spasticity patterns, and was associated with increased treatment efficacy, improved muscle tone, and goal attainment. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01603459. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that, for patients with limb spasticity, escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400 U up to 800 U) increases treatment efficacy without compromising safety or tolerability. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5379931/ /pubmed/28283596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003789 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Wissel, Jörg
Bensmail, Djamel
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Molteni, Franco
Satkunam, Lalith
Moraleda, Susana
Rekand, Tiina
McGuire, John
Scheschonka, Astrid
Flatau-Baqué, Birgit
Simon, Olivier
Rochford, Edward T.J.
Dressler, Dirk
Simpson, David M.
Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study
title Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study
title_full Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study
title_short Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study
title_sort safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxina doses up to 800 u in limb spasticity: the tower study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28283596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003789
work_keys_str_mv AT wisseljorg safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT bensmaildjamel safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT ferreirajoaquimj safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT moltenifranco safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT satkunamlalith safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT moraledasusana safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT rekandtiina safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT mcguirejohn safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT scheschonkaastrid safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT flataubaquebirgit safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT simonolivier safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT rochfordedwardtj safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT dresslerdirk safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy
AT simpsondavidm safetyandefficacyofincobotulinumtoxinadosesupto800uinlimbspasticitythetowerstudy