Cargando…

Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?

Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) is a clinical syndrome characterized by gait abnormality and limb dysfunction, as well as secondary deformities of pelvis and femur. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) typically could be diagnosed on the basis of computed tomography (CT) such as the equatorial-edge a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: You, Tian, Yang, Bei, Zhang, Xin-tao, Jiang, Xiao-cheng, Wang, Shuang, Zhang, Wen-tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28353567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006410
_version_ 1782519745612873728
author You, Tian
Yang, Bei
Zhang, Xin-tao
Jiang, Xiao-cheng
Wang, Shuang
Zhang, Wen-tao
author_facet You, Tian
Yang, Bei
Zhang, Xin-tao
Jiang, Xiao-cheng
Wang, Shuang
Zhang, Wen-tao
author_sort You, Tian
collection PubMed
description Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) is a clinical syndrome characterized by gait abnormality and limb dysfunction, as well as secondary deformities of pelvis and femur. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) typically could be diagnosed on the basis of computed tomography (CT) such as the equatorial-edge angle (EE angle), but it did not work well in GMC patients. In this study, we retrospected all image data and found small EE angles in GMCs, which meant retroverted acetabulum; however, none of them showed no symptoms and signs of FAI. Therefore, we had reasons to think that, some normal hips with unbalanced hip myodynamia as same as GMCs, may be incorrectly diagnosed as FAI through measuring EE angle only. In consequence, the paper was designed to assess the use of the EE angle in the assessment of FAI in the diagnosis, as described by Werner. Twenty-three patients (46 hips) were collected and calculated with the “equatorial-edge angle” (EE angle) by CT scans. All of them were excluded from FAI. Review of the hips showed a mean EE angle was 12.93°, with a minimum of -3.42° and a maximum of 24.08°. The mean value for males and females were 13.52° and 12.40°, respectively, without statistical significance, although the mean value of left hips and right sides reached 13.32° and 12.54° individually, not having statistical differences neither. There were not any symptoms or signs of FAI in all patients. Thus, the reduced EE angle could suggest the local excessive coverage of the femoral head by the anterior acetabular edge, but might not be a reasonably good predictor of FAI. GMC patient's acetabular deformity mainly manifests as increased retroversion, which may be the anatomical basis for FAI and lead to high risks of the acetabular impingement. However, all patients in this study showed no symptoms and signs of FAI, suggesting that the measurement of EE angle can only be applied to assessing those people with normal hip myodynamia, and the bone deformity and the muscular disorder should be both considered in the diagnosis of FAI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5380251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53802512017-04-12 Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle? You, Tian Yang, Bei Zhang, Xin-tao Jiang, Xiao-cheng Wang, Shuang Zhang, Wen-tao Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) is a clinical syndrome characterized by gait abnormality and limb dysfunction, as well as secondary deformities of pelvis and femur. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) typically could be diagnosed on the basis of computed tomography (CT) such as the equatorial-edge angle (EE angle), but it did not work well in GMC patients. In this study, we retrospected all image data and found small EE angles in GMCs, which meant retroverted acetabulum; however, none of them showed no symptoms and signs of FAI. Therefore, we had reasons to think that, some normal hips with unbalanced hip myodynamia as same as GMCs, may be incorrectly diagnosed as FAI through measuring EE angle only. In consequence, the paper was designed to assess the use of the EE angle in the assessment of FAI in the diagnosis, as described by Werner. Twenty-three patients (46 hips) were collected and calculated with the “equatorial-edge angle” (EE angle) by CT scans. All of them were excluded from FAI. Review of the hips showed a mean EE angle was 12.93°, with a minimum of -3.42° and a maximum of 24.08°. The mean value for males and females were 13.52° and 12.40°, respectively, without statistical significance, although the mean value of left hips and right sides reached 13.32° and 12.54° individually, not having statistical differences neither. There were not any symptoms or signs of FAI in all patients. Thus, the reduced EE angle could suggest the local excessive coverage of the femoral head by the anterior acetabular edge, but might not be a reasonably good predictor of FAI. GMC patient's acetabular deformity mainly manifests as increased retroversion, which may be the anatomical basis for FAI and lead to high risks of the acetabular impingement. However, all patients in this study showed no symptoms and signs of FAI, suggesting that the measurement of EE angle can only be applied to assessing those people with normal hip myodynamia, and the bone deformity and the muscular disorder should be both considered in the diagnosis of FAI. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5380251/ /pubmed/28353567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006410 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 3700
You, Tian
Yang, Bei
Zhang, Xin-tao
Jiang, Xiao-cheng
Wang, Shuang
Zhang, Wen-tao
Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
title Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
title_full Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
title_fullStr Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
title_full_unstemmed Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
title_short Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
title_sort are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to ee angle?
topic 3700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28353567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006410
work_keys_str_mv AT youtian arenormalhipsbeinglabeledasfemoroacetabularimpingementduetoeeangle
AT yangbei arenormalhipsbeinglabeledasfemoroacetabularimpingementduetoeeangle
AT zhangxintao arenormalhipsbeinglabeledasfemoroacetabularimpingementduetoeeangle
AT jiangxiaocheng arenormalhipsbeinglabeledasfemoroacetabularimpingementduetoeeangle
AT wangshuang arenormalhipsbeinglabeledasfemoroacetabularimpingementduetoeeangle
AT zhangwentao arenormalhipsbeinglabeledasfemoroacetabularimpingementduetoeeangle