Cargando…

Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of intra-articular (IA) lumbar facet joint (LFJ) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for the management of LFJ pain, and to compare the effect of IA LFJ PRF to IA corticosteroid injection (ICI). Pathology in the LFJ is a common source of lower back pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Do, Kyung Hee, Ahn, Sang Ho, Cho, Yun Woo, Chang, Min Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28353611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006524
_version_ 1782519755581685760
author Do, Kyung Hee
Ahn, Sang Ho
Cho, Yun Woo
Chang, Min Cheol
author_facet Do, Kyung Hee
Ahn, Sang Ho
Cho, Yun Woo
Chang, Min Cheol
author_sort Do, Kyung Hee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of intra-articular (IA) lumbar facet joint (LFJ) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for the management of LFJ pain, and to compare the effect of IA LFJ PRF to IA corticosteroid injection (ICI). Pathology in the LFJ is a common source of lower back pain (LBP). It is responsible for chronic LBP in approximately 15% to 45% of patients. It has been reported that PRF stimulation can effectively reduce refractory joint pain. METHODS: Sixty patients with LFJ pain were recruited and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: the IA PRF group and the ICI group. There were 30 patients in each group. At pretreatment, 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, we assessed the severity of LBP using a numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: Compared with the pretreatment NRS scores, patients in both groups showed a significant decrease in NRS scores at 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months after each treatment. Between groups, changes in the NRS scores were significantly different over time. At 2 weeks and 1 month after each procedure, the NRS score after ICI was significantly lower than that after the PRF stimulation. However, at 3 and 6 months after the procedures, the decrements of NRS scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Six months after treatment, about half of patients in both groups reported successful pain relief (pain relief of ≥50%). CONCLUSION: In the current study, both IA PRF stimulation and ICI into the LFJ significantly relieved LFJ pain. Their effects persisted for at least 6 months after the procedure. Thus, IA PRF is a useful therapeutic option for the management of LFJ pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5380295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53802952017-04-12 Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial Do, Kyung Hee Ahn, Sang Ho Cho, Yun Woo Chang, Min Cheol Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of intra-articular (IA) lumbar facet joint (LFJ) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for the management of LFJ pain, and to compare the effect of IA LFJ PRF to IA corticosteroid injection (ICI). Pathology in the LFJ is a common source of lower back pain (LBP). It is responsible for chronic LBP in approximately 15% to 45% of patients. It has been reported that PRF stimulation can effectively reduce refractory joint pain. METHODS: Sixty patients with LFJ pain were recruited and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: the IA PRF group and the ICI group. There were 30 patients in each group. At pretreatment, 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, we assessed the severity of LBP using a numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: Compared with the pretreatment NRS scores, patients in both groups showed a significant decrease in NRS scores at 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months after each treatment. Between groups, changes in the NRS scores were significantly different over time. At 2 weeks and 1 month after each procedure, the NRS score after ICI was significantly lower than that after the PRF stimulation. However, at 3 and 6 months after the procedures, the decrements of NRS scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Six months after treatment, about half of patients in both groups reported successful pain relief (pain relief of ≥50%). CONCLUSION: In the current study, both IA PRF stimulation and ICI into the LFJ significantly relieved LFJ pain. Their effects persisted for at least 6 months after the procedure. Thus, IA PRF is a useful therapeutic option for the management of LFJ pain. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5380295/ /pubmed/28353611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006524 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Do, Kyung Hee
Ahn, Sang Ho
Cho, Yun Woo
Chang, Min Cheol
Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28353611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006524
work_keys_str_mv AT dokyunghee comparisonofintraarticularlumbarfacetjointpulsedradiofrequencyandintraarticularlumbarfacetjointcorticosteroidinjectionformanagementoflumbarfacetjointpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahnsangho comparisonofintraarticularlumbarfacetjointpulsedradiofrequencyandintraarticularlumbarfacetjointcorticosteroidinjectionformanagementoflumbarfacetjointpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choyunwoo comparisonofintraarticularlumbarfacetjointpulsedradiofrequencyandintraarticularlumbarfacetjointcorticosteroidinjectionformanagementoflumbarfacetjointpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changmincheol comparisonofintraarticularlumbarfacetjointpulsedradiofrequencyandintraarticularlumbarfacetjointcorticosteroidinjectionformanagementoflumbarfacetjointpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial