Cargando…
Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
Vision is a physical sense, whereas olfaction and gustation are chemical senses. Active sensing might function in vision, olfaction, and gustation, whereas passive sensing might function in vision and olfaction but not gustation. To investigate whether each sensory property affected synchrony percep...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174958 |
_version_ | 1782519765668986880 |
---|---|
author | Gotow, Naomi Kobayakawa, Tatsu |
author_facet | Gotow, Naomi Kobayakawa, Tatsu |
author_sort | Gotow, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vision is a physical sense, whereas olfaction and gustation are chemical senses. Active sensing might function in vision, olfaction, and gustation, whereas passive sensing might function in vision and olfaction but not gustation. To investigate whether each sensory property affected synchrony perception, participants in this study performed simultaneity judgment (SJ) for three cross-modal combinations using visual (red LED light), olfactory (coumarin), and gustatory (NaCl solution) stimuli. We calculated the half-width at half-height (HWHH) and point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) on the basis of temporal distributions of simultaneous response rates in each combination. Although HWHH did not differ significantly among three cross-modal combinations, HWHH exhibited a higher value in cross-modal combinations involving one or two chemical stimuli than in combinations of two physical stimuli, reported in a previous study. The PSS of the olfactory–visual combination was approximately equal to the point of objective simultaneity (POS), whereas the PSS of visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations receded significantly from the POS. In order to generalize these results as specific to chemical senses in regard to synchrony perception, we need to determine whether the same phenomena will be reproduced when performing SJ for various cross-modal combinations using visual, olfactory, and gustatory stimuli other than red LED light, coumarin, and NaCl solution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5380340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53803402017-04-19 Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations Gotow, Naomi Kobayakawa, Tatsu PLoS One Research Article Vision is a physical sense, whereas olfaction and gustation are chemical senses. Active sensing might function in vision, olfaction, and gustation, whereas passive sensing might function in vision and olfaction but not gustation. To investigate whether each sensory property affected synchrony perception, participants in this study performed simultaneity judgment (SJ) for three cross-modal combinations using visual (red LED light), olfactory (coumarin), and gustatory (NaCl solution) stimuli. We calculated the half-width at half-height (HWHH) and point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) on the basis of temporal distributions of simultaneous response rates in each combination. Although HWHH did not differ significantly among three cross-modal combinations, HWHH exhibited a higher value in cross-modal combinations involving one or two chemical stimuli than in combinations of two physical stimuli, reported in a previous study. The PSS of the olfactory–visual combination was approximately equal to the point of objective simultaneity (POS), whereas the PSS of visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations receded significantly from the POS. In order to generalize these results as specific to chemical senses in regard to synchrony perception, we need to determine whether the same phenomena will be reproduced when performing SJ for various cross-modal combinations using visual, olfactory, and gustatory stimuli other than red LED light, coumarin, and NaCl solution. Public Library of Science 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5380340/ /pubmed/28376116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174958 Text en © 2017 Gotow, Kobayakawa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gotow, Naomi Kobayakawa, Tatsu Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
title | Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
title_full | Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
title_fullStr | Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
title_full_unstemmed | Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
title_short | Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
title_sort | simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotownaomi simultaneityjudgmentusingolfactoryvisualvisualgustatoryandolfactorygustatorycombinations AT kobayakawatatsu simultaneityjudgmentusingolfactoryvisualvisualgustatoryandolfactorygustatorycombinations |