Cargando…

Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations

Vision is a physical sense, whereas olfaction and gustation are chemical senses. Active sensing might function in vision, olfaction, and gustation, whereas passive sensing might function in vision and olfaction but not gustation. To investigate whether each sensory property affected synchrony percep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gotow, Naomi, Kobayakawa, Tatsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174958
_version_ 1782519765668986880
author Gotow, Naomi
Kobayakawa, Tatsu
author_facet Gotow, Naomi
Kobayakawa, Tatsu
author_sort Gotow, Naomi
collection PubMed
description Vision is a physical sense, whereas olfaction and gustation are chemical senses. Active sensing might function in vision, olfaction, and gustation, whereas passive sensing might function in vision and olfaction but not gustation. To investigate whether each sensory property affected synchrony perception, participants in this study performed simultaneity judgment (SJ) for three cross-modal combinations using visual (red LED light), olfactory (coumarin), and gustatory (NaCl solution) stimuli. We calculated the half-width at half-height (HWHH) and point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) on the basis of temporal distributions of simultaneous response rates in each combination. Although HWHH did not differ significantly among three cross-modal combinations, HWHH exhibited a higher value in cross-modal combinations involving one or two chemical stimuli than in combinations of two physical stimuli, reported in a previous study. The PSS of the olfactory–visual combination was approximately equal to the point of objective simultaneity (POS), whereas the PSS of visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations receded significantly from the POS. In order to generalize these results as specific to chemical senses in regard to synchrony perception, we need to determine whether the same phenomena will be reproduced when performing SJ for various cross-modal combinations using visual, olfactory, and gustatory stimuli other than red LED light, coumarin, and NaCl solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5380340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53803402017-04-19 Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations Gotow, Naomi Kobayakawa, Tatsu PLoS One Research Article Vision is a physical sense, whereas olfaction and gustation are chemical senses. Active sensing might function in vision, olfaction, and gustation, whereas passive sensing might function in vision and olfaction but not gustation. To investigate whether each sensory property affected synchrony perception, participants in this study performed simultaneity judgment (SJ) for three cross-modal combinations using visual (red LED light), olfactory (coumarin), and gustatory (NaCl solution) stimuli. We calculated the half-width at half-height (HWHH) and point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) on the basis of temporal distributions of simultaneous response rates in each combination. Although HWHH did not differ significantly among three cross-modal combinations, HWHH exhibited a higher value in cross-modal combinations involving one or two chemical stimuli than in combinations of two physical stimuli, reported in a previous study. The PSS of the olfactory–visual combination was approximately equal to the point of objective simultaneity (POS), whereas the PSS of visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations receded significantly from the POS. In order to generalize these results as specific to chemical senses in regard to synchrony perception, we need to determine whether the same phenomena will be reproduced when performing SJ for various cross-modal combinations using visual, olfactory, and gustatory stimuli other than red LED light, coumarin, and NaCl solution. Public Library of Science 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5380340/ /pubmed/28376116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174958 Text en © 2017 Gotow, Kobayakawa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gotow, Naomi
Kobayakawa, Tatsu
Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
title Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
title_full Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
title_fullStr Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
title_short Simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
title_sort simultaneity judgment using olfactory–visual, visual–gustatory, and olfactory–gustatory combinations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174958
work_keys_str_mv AT gotownaomi simultaneityjudgmentusingolfactoryvisualvisualgustatoryandolfactorygustatorycombinations
AT kobayakawatatsu simultaneityjudgmentusingolfactoryvisualvisualgustatoryandolfactorygustatorycombinations