Cargando…

Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)

To elucidate microscopic details of proton cancer therapy (PCT), we apply the simplest-level electron nuclear dynamics (SLEND) method to H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6) at E(Lab) = 100 keV. These systems are computationally tractable prototypes to simulate water radiolysis reactions—i.e. the PCT processes that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Privett, Austin J., Teixeira, Erico S., Stopera, Christopher, Morales, Jorge A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174456
_version_ 1782519769192202240
author Privett, Austin J.
Teixeira, Erico S.
Stopera, Christopher
Morales, Jorge A.
author_facet Privett, Austin J.
Teixeira, Erico S.
Stopera, Christopher
Morales, Jorge A.
author_sort Privett, Austin J.
collection PubMed
description To elucidate microscopic details of proton cancer therapy (PCT), we apply the simplest-level electron nuclear dynamics (SLEND) method to H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6) at E(Lab) = 100 keV. These systems are computationally tractable prototypes to simulate water radiolysis reactions—i.e. the PCT processes that generate the DNA-damaging species against cancerous cells. To capture incipient bulk-water effects, ten (H(2)O)(1-6) isomers are considered, ranging from quasi-planar/multiplanar (H(2)O)(1-6) to “smallest-drop” prism and cage (H(2)O)(6) structures. SLEND is a time-dependent, variational, non-adiabatic and direct method that adopts a nuclear classical-mechanics description and an electronic single-determinantal wavefunction in the Thouless representation. Short-time SLEND/6-31G* (n = 1–6) and /6-31G** (n = 1–5) simulations render cluster-to-projectile 1-electron-transfer (1-ET) total integral cross sections (ICSs) and 1-ET probabilities. In absolute quantitative terms, SLEND/6-31G* 1-ET ICS compares satisfactorily with alternative experimental and theoretical results only available for n = 1 and exhibits almost the same accuracy of the best alternative theoretical result. SLEND/6-31G** overestimates 1-ET ICS for n = 1, but a comparable overestimation is also observed with another theoretical method. An investigation on H(+) + H indicates that electron direct ionization (DI) becomes significant with the large virtual-space quasi-continuum in large basis sets; thus, SLEND/6-31G** 1-ET ICS is overestimated by DI contributions. The solution to this problem is discussed. In relative quantitative terms, both SLEND/6-31* and /6-31G** 1-ET ICSs precisely fit into physically justified scaling formulae as a function of the cluster size; this indicates SLEND’s suitability for predicting properties of water clusters with varying size. Long-time SLEND/6-31G* (n = 1–4) simulations predict the formation of the DNA-damaging radicals H, OH, O and H(3)O. While “smallest-drop” isomers are included, no early manifestations of bulk water PCT properties are observed and simulations with larger water clusters will be needed to capture those effects. This study is the largest SLEND investigation on water radiolysis to date.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5380356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53803562017-04-19 Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6) Privett, Austin J. Teixeira, Erico S. Stopera, Christopher Morales, Jorge A. PLoS One Research Article To elucidate microscopic details of proton cancer therapy (PCT), we apply the simplest-level electron nuclear dynamics (SLEND) method to H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6) at E(Lab) = 100 keV. These systems are computationally tractable prototypes to simulate water radiolysis reactions—i.e. the PCT processes that generate the DNA-damaging species against cancerous cells. To capture incipient bulk-water effects, ten (H(2)O)(1-6) isomers are considered, ranging from quasi-planar/multiplanar (H(2)O)(1-6) to “smallest-drop” prism and cage (H(2)O)(6) structures. SLEND is a time-dependent, variational, non-adiabatic and direct method that adopts a nuclear classical-mechanics description and an electronic single-determinantal wavefunction in the Thouless representation. Short-time SLEND/6-31G* (n = 1–6) and /6-31G** (n = 1–5) simulations render cluster-to-projectile 1-electron-transfer (1-ET) total integral cross sections (ICSs) and 1-ET probabilities. In absolute quantitative terms, SLEND/6-31G* 1-ET ICS compares satisfactorily with alternative experimental and theoretical results only available for n = 1 and exhibits almost the same accuracy of the best alternative theoretical result. SLEND/6-31G** overestimates 1-ET ICS for n = 1, but a comparable overestimation is also observed with another theoretical method. An investigation on H(+) + H indicates that electron direct ionization (DI) becomes significant with the large virtual-space quasi-continuum in large basis sets; thus, SLEND/6-31G** 1-ET ICS is overestimated by DI contributions. The solution to this problem is discussed. In relative quantitative terms, both SLEND/6-31* and /6-31G** 1-ET ICSs precisely fit into physically justified scaling formulae as a function of the cluster size; this indicates SLEND’s suitability for predicting properties of water clusters with varying size. Long-time SLEND/6-31G* (n = 1–4) simulations predict the formation of the DNA-damaging radicals H, OH, O and H(3)O. While “smallest-drop” isomers are included, no early manifestations of bulk water PCT properties are observed and simulations with larger water clusters will be needed to capture those effects. This study is the largest SLEND investigation on water radiolysis to date. Public Library of Science 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5380356/ /pubmed/28376128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174456 Text en © 2017 Privett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Privett, Austin J.
Teixeira, Erico S.
Stopera, Christopher
Morales, Jorge A.
Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)
title Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)
title_full Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)
title_fullStr Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)
title_full_unstemmed Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)
title_short Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H(+) + (H(2)O)(1-6)
title_sort exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of h(+) + (h(2)o)(1-6)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174456
work_keys_str_mv AT privettaustinj exploringwaterradiolysisinprotoncancertherapytimedependentnonadiabaticsimulationsofhh2o16
AT teixeiraericos exploringwaterradiolysisinprotoncancertherapytimedependentnonadiabaticsimulationsofhh2o16
AT stoperachristopher exploringwaterradiolysisinprotoncancertherapytimedependentnonadiabaticsimulationsofhh2o16
AT moralesjorgea exploringwaterradiolysisinprotoncancertherapytimedependentnonadiabaticsimulationsofhh2o16