Cargando…
Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain
INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are used successfully in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes as they are associated with low hypoglycemia rates, weight loss and improved glycemic control. This study compared, in the Spanish setting, the cost-effectiveness o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0239-6 |
_version_ | 1782519779631824896 |
---|---|
author | Mezquita-Raya, Pedro Ramírez de Arellano, Antonio Kragh, Nana Vega-Hernandez, Gabriela Pöhlmann, Johannes Valentine, William J. Hunt, Barnaby |
author_facet | Mezquita-Raya, Pedro Ramírez de Arellano, Antonio Kragh, Nana Vega-Hernandez, Gabriela Pöhlmann, Johannes Valentine, William J. Hunt, Barnaby |
author_sort | Mezquita-Raya, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are used successfully in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes as they are associated with low hypoglycemia rates, weight loss and improved glycemic control. This study compared, in the Spanish setting, the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide 1.8 mg versus lixisenatide 20 μg, both GLP-1 receptor agonists, for patients with type 2 diabetes who had not achieved glycemic control targets on metformin monotherapy. METHODS: The IMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to project clinical outcomes and costs, expressed in 2015 Euros, over patient lifetimes. Baseline cohort data and treatment effects were taken from the 26-week, open-label LIRA-LIXI™ trial (NCT01973231). Treatment and management costs of diabetes-related complications were retrieved from published sources and databases. Future benefits and costs were discounted by 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Compared with lixisenatide 20 μg, liraglutide 1.8 mg was associated with higher life expectancy (14.42 vs. 14.29 years), higher quality-adjusted life expectancy [9.40 versus 9.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] and a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications. Higher acquisition costs resulted in higher total costs for liraglutide 1.8 mg (EUR 42,689) than for lixisenatide 20 μg (EUR 42,143), but these were partly offset by reduced costs of treating diabetes-related complications (EUR 29,613 vs. EUR 30,636). Projected clinical outcomes and costs resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 4113 per QALY gained for liraglutide 1.8 mg versus lixisenatide 20 μg. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term projections in the Spanish setting suggest that liraglutide 1.8 mg is likely to be cost-effective compared with lixisenatide 20 μg in type 2 diabetes patients who have not achieved glycemic control targets on metformin monotherapy. Liraglutide 1.8 mg presents a clinically and economically attractive treatment option in the Spanish setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5380501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53805012017-04-17 Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain Mezquita-Raya, Pedro Ramírez de Arellano, Antonio Kragh, Nana Vega-Hernandez, Gabriela Pöhlmann, Johannes Valentine, William J. Hunt, Barnaby Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are used successfully in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes as they are associated with low hypoglycemia rates, weight loss and improved glycemic control. This study compared, in the Spanish setting, the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide 1.8 mg versus lixisenatide 20 μg, both GLP-1 receptor agonists, for patients with type 2 diabetes who had not achieved glycemic control targets on metformin monotherapy. METHODS: The IMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to project clinical outcomes and costs, expressed in 2015 Euros, over patient lifetimes. Baseline cohort data and treatment effects were taken from the 26-week, open-label LIRA-LIXI™ trial (NCT01973231). Treatment and management costs of diabetes-related complications were retrieved from published sources and databases. Future benefits and costs were discounted by 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Compared with lixisenatide 20 μg, liraglutide 1.8 mg was associated with higher life expectancy (14.42 vs. 14.29 years), higher quality-adjusted life expectancy [9.40 versus 9.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] and a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications. Higher acquisition costs resulted in higher total costs for liraglutide 1.8 mg (EUR 42,689) than for lixisenatide 20 μg (EUR 42,143), but these were partly offset by reduced costs of treating diabetes-related complications (EUR 29,613 vs. EUR 30,636). Projected clinical outcomes and costs resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 4113 per QALY gained for liraglutide 1.8 mg versus lixisenatide 20 μg. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term projections in the Spanish setting suggest that liraglutide 1.8 mg is likely to be cost-effective compared with lixisenatide 20 μg in type 2 diabetes patients who have not achieved glycemic control targets on metformin monotherapy. Liraglutide 1.8 mg presents a clinically and economically attractive treatment option in the Spanish setting. Springer Healthcare 2017-02-21 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5380501/ /pubmed/28224463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0239-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mezquita-Raya, Pedro Ramírez de Arellano, Antonio Kragh, Nana Vega-Hernandez, Gabriela Pöhlmann, Johannes Valentine, William J. Hunt, Barnaby Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain |
title | Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain |
title_full | Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain |
title_fullStr | Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain |
title_full_unstemmed | Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain |
title_short | Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain |
title_sort | liraglutide versus lixisenatide: long-term cost-effectiveness of glp-1 receptor agonist therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in spain |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0239-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mezquitarayapedro liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain AT ramirezdearellanoantonio liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain AT kraghnana liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain AT vegahernandezgabriela liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain AT pohlmannjohannes liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain AT valentinewilliamj liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain AT huntbarnaby liraglutideversuslixisenatidelongtermcosteffectivenessofglp1receptoragonisttherapyforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesinspain |