Cargando…

Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals

PURPOSE: Continuous observation of psychiatric inpatients aims to protect those who pose an acute risk of harm to self or others, but involves intrusive privacy restrictions. Initiating, conducting and ending continuous observation requires complex decision-making about keeping patients safe whilst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnicot, Kirsten, Insua-Summerhayes, Bryony, Plummer, Emily, Hart, Alice, Barker, Chris, Priebe, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28161766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1338-4
_version_ 1782519795325861888
author Barnicot, Kirsten
Insua-Summerhayes, Bryony
Plummer, Emily
Hart, Alice
Barker, Chris
Priebe, Stefan
author_facet Barnicot, Kirsten
Insua-Summerhayes, Bryony
Plummer, Emily
Hart, Alice
Barker, Chris
Priebe, Stefan
author_sort Barnicot, Kirsten
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Continuous observation of psychiatric inpatients aims to protect those who pose an acute risk of harm to self or others, but involves intrusive privacy restrictions. Initiating, conducting and ending continuous observation requires complex decision-making about keeping patients safe whilst protecting their privacy. There is little published guidance about how to balance privacy and safety concerns, and how staff and patients negotiate this in practice is unknown. To inform best practice, the present study, therefore, aimed to understand how staff and patients experience negotiating the balance between privacy and safety during decision-making about continuous observation. METHODS: Thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with thirty-one inpatient psychiatric staff and twenty-eight inpatients. RESULTS: Most patients struggled with the lack of privacy but valued feeling safe during continuous observation. Staff and patients linked good decision-making to using continuous observation for short periods and taking positive risks, understanding and collaborating with the patient, and working together as a supportive staff team. Poor decision-making was linked to insufficient consideration of observation’s iatrogenic potential, insufficient collaboration with patients, and the stressful impact on staff of conducting observations and managing risk. CONCLUSIONS: Best practice in decision-making about continuous observation may be facilitated by making decisions in collaboration with patients, and by staff supporting each-other in positive risk-taking. To achieve truly patient-centred decision-making, decisions about observation should not be influenced by staff’s own stress levels. To address the negative impact of staff stress on decision-making, it may be helpful to improve staff training, education and support structures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1338-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5380690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53806902017-04-17 Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals Barnicot, Kirsten Insua-Summerhayes, Bryony Plummer, Emily Hart, Alice Barker, Chris Priebe, Stefan Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: Continuous observation of psychiatric inpatients aims to protect those who pose an acute risk of harm to self or others, but involves intrusive privacy restrictions. Initiating, conducting and ending continuous observation requires complex decision-making about keeping patients safe whilst protecting their privacy. There is little published guidance about how to balance privacy and safety concerns, and how staff and patients negotiate this in practice is unknown. To inform best practice, the present study, therefore, aimed to understand how staff and patients experience negotiating the balance between privacy and safety during decision-making about continuous observation. METHODS: Thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with thirty-one inpatient psychiatric staff and twenty-eight inpatients. RESULTS: Most patients struggled with the lack of privacy but valued feeling safe during continuous observation. Staff and patients linked good decision-making to using continuous observation for short periods and taking positive risks, understanding and collaborating with the patient, and working together as a supportive staff team. Poor decision-making was linked to insufficient consideration of observation’s iatrogenic potential, insufficient collaboration with patients, and the stressful impact on staff of conducting observations and managing risk. CONCLUSIONS: Best practice in decision-making about continuous observation may be facilitated by making decisions in collaboration with patients, and by staff supporting each-other in positive risk-taking. To achieve truly patient-centred decision-making, decisions about observation should not be influenced by staff’s own stress levels. To address the negative impact of staff stress on decision-making, it may be helpful to improve staff training, education and support structures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1338-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-02-04 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5380690/ /pubmed/28161766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1338-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Barnicot, Kirsten
Insua-Summerhayes, Bryony
Plummer, Emily
Hart, Alice
Barker, Chris
Priebe, Stefan
Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
title Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
title_full Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
title_fullStr Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
title_short Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
title_sort staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28161766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1338-4
work_keys_str_mv AT barnicotkirsten staffandpatientexperiencesofdecisionmakingaboutcontinuousobservationinpsychiatrichospitals
AT insuasummerhayesbryony staffandpatientexperiencesofdecisionmakingaboutcontinuousobservationinpsychiatrichospitals
AT plummeremily staffandpatientexperiencesofdecisionmakingaboutcontinuousobservationinpsychiatrichospitals
AT hartalice staffandpatientexperiencesofdecisionmakingaboutcontinuousobservationinpsychiatrichospitals
AT barkerchris staffandpatientexperiencesofdecisionmakingaboutcontinuousobservationinpsychiatrichospitals
AT priebestefan staffandpatientexperiencesofdecisionmakingaboutcontinuousobservationinpsychiatrichospitals