Cargando…
A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
BACKGROUND: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or “forgotten.” Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or langua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0123-3 |
_version_ | 1782519864523489280 |
---|---|
author | Molina, Wilson R. Pessoa, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo Kenny, McCabe C. Gustafson, Diedra Nogueira, Leticia Leo, Mark E. Yu, Michael K. Kim, Fernando J. |
author_facet | Molina, Wilson R. Pessoa, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo Kenny, McCabe C. Gustafson, Diedra Nogueira, Leticia Leo, Mark E. Yu, Michael K. Kim, Fernando J. |
author_sort | Molina, Wilson R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or “forgotten.” Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or language barriers, and economic concerns. METHODS: We describe a multiplatform application that facilitates data collection to prevent RUS. The “Stent Tracker” application can be installed on mobile devices and computers. The encrypted and password-protected information is accessible from any device and provides information about each procedure, stent placement and removal dates, as well as product description. This multicenter retrospective study included 194 patients who underwent stent placement between July and October 2015. Nominal data was tallied and ordinal data was divided into quartiles of 25, 50, and 75%. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients from three institutions underwent ureteral stent placement. Reasons for stent placement include 122 cases post ureteroscopy (63%), 8 cases post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (4%), 14 cases post extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (7%), 18 cases of cancer-related ureteral obstruction (9%), 21 cases of hydronephrosis (11%), and 11 for other reasons (6%). Of these patients, only one patient was lost to follow-up (0.5%). On average, ureteral stents were removed within 14 days of placement (IQR: 8-26 days). CONCLUSIONS: The “Stent Tracker” is a patient safety application that provides a secure and simplified interface, which can significantly reduce the incidence of RUS. Further developments could include automated notifications to patients and staff, color-coding, and integrated information with electronic patient charts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5381069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53810692017-04-10 A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients Molina, Wilson R. Pessoa, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo Kenny, McCabe C. Gustafson, Diedra Nogueira, Leticia Leo, Mark E. Yu, Michael K. Kim, Fernando J. Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or “forgotten.” Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or language barriers, and economic concerns. METHODS: We describe a multiplatform application that facilitates data collection to prevent RUS. The “Stent Tracker” application can be installed on mobile devices and computers. The encrypted and password-protected information is accessible from any device and provides information about each procedure, stent placement and removal dates, as well as product description. This multicenter retrospective study included 194 patients who underwent stent placement between July and October 2015. Nominal data was tallied and ordinal data was divided into quartiles of 25, 50, and 75%. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients from three institutions underwent ureteral stent placement. Reasons for stent placement include 122 cases post ureteroscopy (63%), 8 cases post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (4%), 14 cases post extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (7%), 18 cases of cancer-related ureteral obstruction (9%), 21 cases of hydronephrosis (11%), and 11 for other reasons (6%). Of these patients, only one patient was lost to follow-up (0.5%). On average, ureteral stents were removed within 14 days of placement (IQR: 8-26 days). CONCLUSIONS: The “Stent Tracker” is a patient safety application that provides a secure and simplified interface, which can significantly reduce the incidence of RUS. Further developments could include automated notifications to patients and staff, color-coding, and integrated information with electronic patient charts. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5381069/ /pubmed/28396695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0123-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Molina, Wilson R. Pessoa, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo Kenny, McCabe C. Gustafson, Diedra Nogueira, Leticia Leo, Mark E. Yu, Michael K. Kim, Fernando J. A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
title | A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
title_full | A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
title_fullStr | A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
title_short | A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
title_sort | new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0123-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinawilsonr anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT pessoarodrigo anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT donalisiodasilvarodrigo anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT kennymccabec anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT gustafsondiedra anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT nogueiraleticia anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT leomarke anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT yumichaelk anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT kimfernandoj anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT molinawilsonr newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT pessoarodrigo newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT donalisiodasilvarodrigo newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT kennymccabec newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT gustafsondiedra newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT nogueiraleticia newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT leomarke newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT yumichaelk newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients AT kimfernandoj newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients |