Cargando…

A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients

BACKGROUND: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or “forgotten.” Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or langua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molina, Wilson R., Pessoa, Rodrigo, Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo, Kenny, McCabe C., Gustafson, Diedra, Nogueira, Leticia, Leo, Mark E., Yu, Michael K., Kim, Fernando J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0123-3
_version_ 1782519864523489280
author Molina, Wilson R.
Pessoa, Rodrigo
Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo
Kenny, McCabe C.
Gustafson, Diedra
Nogueira, Leticia
Leo, Mark E.
Yu, Michael K.
Kim, Fernando J.
author_facet Molina, Wilson R.
Pessoa, Rodrigo
Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo
Kenny, McCabe C.
Gustafson, Diedra
Nogueira, Leticia
Leo, Mark E.
Yu, Michael K.
Kim, Fernando J.
author_sort Molina, Wilson R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or “forgotten.” Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or language barriers, and economic concerns. METHODS: We describe a multiplatform application that facilitates data collection to prevent RUS. The “Stent Tracker” application can be installed on mobile devices and computers. The encrypted and password-protected information is accessible from any device and provides information about each procedure, stent placement and removal dates, as well as product description. This multicenter retrospective study included 194 patients who underwent stent placement between July and October 2015. Nominal data was tallied and ordinal data was divided into quartiles of 25, 50, and 75%. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients from three institutions underwent ureteral stent placement. Reasons for stent placement include 122 cases post ureteroscopy (63%), 8 cases post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (4%), 14 cases post extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (7%), 18 cases of cancer-related ureteral obstruction (9%), 21 cases of hydronephrosis (11%), and 11 for other reasons (6%). Of these patients, only one patient was lost to follow-up (0.5%). On average, ureteral stents were removed within 14 days of placement (IQR: 8-26 days). CONCLUSIONS: The “Stent Tracker” is a patient safety application that provides a secure and simplified interface, which can significantly reduce the incidence of RUS. Further developments could include automated notifications to patients and staff, color-coding, and integrated information with electronic patient charts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5381069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53810692017-04-10 A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients Molina, Wilson R. Pessoa, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo Kenny, McCabe C. Gustafson, Diedra Nogueira, Leticia Leo, Mark E. Yu, Michael K. Kim, Fernando J. Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or “forgotten.” Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or language barriers, and economic concerns. METHODS: We describe a multiplatform application that facilitates data collection to prevent RUS. The “Stent Tracker” application can be installed on mobile devices and computers. The encrypted and password-protected information is accessible from any device and provides information about each procedure, stent placement and removal dates, as well as product description. This multicenter retrospective study included 194 patients who underwent stent placement between July and October 2015. Nominal data was tallied and ordinal data was divided into quartiles of 25, 50, and 75%. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients from three institutions underwent ureteral stent placement. Reasons for stent placement include 122 cases post ureteroscopy (63%), 8 cases post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (4%), 14 cases post extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (7%), 18 cases of cancer-related ureteral obstruction (9%), 21 cases of hydronephrosis (11%), and 11 for other reasons (6%). Of these patients, only one patient was lost to follow-up (0.5%). On average, ureteral stents were removed within 14 days of placement (IQR: 8-26 days). CONCLUSIONS: The “Stent Tracker” is a patient safety application that provides a secure and simplified interface, which can significantly reduce the incidence of RUS. Further developments could include automated notifications to patients and staff, color-coding, and integrated information with electronic patient charts. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5381069/ /pubmed/28396695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0123-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Molina, Wilson R.
Pessoa, Rodrigo
Donalisio da Silva, Rodrigo
Kenny, McCabe C.
Gustafson, Diedra
Nogueira, Leticia
Leo, Mark E.
Yu, Michael K.
Kim, Fernando J.
A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
title A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
title_full A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
title_fullStr A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
title_full_unstemmed A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
title_short A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
title_sort new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of “forgotten” ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0123-3
work_keys_str_mv AT molinawilsonr anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT pessoarodrigo anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT donalisiodasilvarodrigo anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT kennymccabec anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT gustafsondiedra anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT nogueiraleticia anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT leomarke anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT yumichaelk anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT kimfernandoj anewpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT molinawilsonr newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT pessoarodrigo newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT donalisiodasilvarodrigo newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT kennymccabec newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT gustafsondiedra newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT nogueiraleticia newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT leomarke newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT yumichaelk newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients
AT kimfernandoj newpatientsafetysmartphoneapplicationforpreventionofforgottenureteralstentsresultsfromaclinicalpilotstudyin194patients