Cargando…

Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Late-onset sepsis (LOS), defined as sepsis occurring after 48 h of age causes substantial mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Risk factors for LOS include immaturity, intravascular catheters, mechanical ventilation, and prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN). Little at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alcock, Gary, Liley, Helen G., Cooke, Lucy, Gray, Peter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3
_version_ 1782519869256761344
author Alcock, Gary
Liley, Helen G.
Cooke, Lucy
Gray, Peter H.
author_facet Alcock, Gary
Liley, Helen G.
Cooke, Lucy
Gray, Peter H.
author_sort Alcock, Gary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Late-onset sepsis (LOS), defined as sepsis occurring after 48 h of age causes substantial mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Risk factors for LOS include immaturity, intravascular catheters, mechanical ventilation, and prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN). Little attention has been paid to studying the effects of PN administration methods. The aim of the study was to compare a bundle of measures for PN line management incorporating a strict aseptic technique with standard line management on LOS in very low birth weight infants. METHODS: Infants <1500 g birth weight who required PN were randomised to either a bundle of a strict aseptic technique for line management together with single use intravascular catheter for PN or a standard technique. The primary outcome was the incidence of LOS in the first 28 days of life. Secondary outcomes were mortality, neonatal morbidities and developmental outcome at 12 months of age. RESULTS: There were 126 infants in the aseptic technique group and 123 in the standard technique group. Forty (31.8%) infants in the aseptic technique group and 36 (29.3%) in the standard technique group had an episode of sepsis (p = 0.77). This corresponds to incidences of 15.8 and 14.2 episodes of sepsis per 1000 patient days respectively. Subgroup analyses for infants <1000 g also revealed no difference in the rate of sepsis between the intervention and control groups. (p = 0.43). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes and development between the groups. CONCLUSION: A bundle of measures including strict aseptic technique for parenteral nutrition line management did not result in a reduction in LOS when compared to a standard technique. There is no evidence to recommend this as routine practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Interdisciplinary Maternal Perinatal Australasian Collaborative Trials (IMPACT) Network, TRN registration number: PT0363. Date: 06/03/2001; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), TRN registration number: ACTRN12617000455369. Date: 28/03/2017 (retrospectively registered). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5381090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53810902017-04-10 Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial Alcock, Gary Liley, Helen G. Cooke, Lucy Gray, Peter H. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Late-onset sepsis (LOS), defined as sepsis occurring after 48 h of age causes substantial mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Risk factors for LOS include immaturity, intravascular catheters, mechanical ventilation, and prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN). Little attention has been paid to studying the effects of PN administration methods. The aim of the study was to compare a bundle of measures for PN line management incorporating a strict aseptic technique with standard line management on LOS in very low birth weight infants. METHODS: Infants <1500 g birth weight who required PN were randomised to either a bundle of a strict aseptic technique for line management together with single use intravascular catheter for PN or a standard technique. The primary outcome was the incidence of LOS in the first 28 days of life. Secondary outcomes were mortality, neonatal morbidities and developmental outcome at 12 months of age. RESULTS: There were 126 infants in the aseptic technique group and 123 in the standard technique group. Forty (31.8%) infants in the aseptic technique group and 36 (29.3%) in the standard technique group had an episode of sepsis (p = 0.77). This corresponds to incidences of 15.8 and 14.2 episodes of sepsis per 1000 patient days respectively. Subgroup analyses for infants <1000 g also revealed no difference in the rate of sepsis between the intervention and control groups. (p = 0.43). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes and development between the groups. CONCLUSION: A bundle of measures including strict aseptic technique for parenteral nutrition line management did not result in a reduction in LOS when compared to a standard technique. There is no evidence to recommend this as routine practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Interdisciplinary Maternal Perinatal Australasian Collaborative Trials (IMPACT) Network, TRN registration number: PT0363. Date: 06/03/2001; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), TRN registration number: ACTRN12617000455369. Date: 28/03/2017 (retrospectively registered). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5381090/ /pubmed/28376891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alcock, Gary
Liley, Helen G.
Cooke, Lucy
Gray, Peter H.
Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
title Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3
work_keys_str_mv AT alcockgary preventionofneonatallateonsetsepsisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lileyheleng preventionofneonatallateonsetsepsisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cookelucy preventionofneonatallateonsetsepsisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT graypeterh preventionofneonatallateonsetsepsisarandomisedcontrolledtrial