Cargando…
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Should we continue lacrimal massage till 1 year or perform an office probing at 6 months? A clinical decision analysis approach
Autores principales: | Kothari, Mihir, Rathod, Vivek, Shah, Kruti, Shikhangi, Khushboo, Singhania, Renu |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345576 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_245_16 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical Outcomes of Initial and Repeated Nasolacrimal Duct Office-Based Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
por: Cha, Deok Sun, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Use of smart lacrimal probes
por: Kothari, Mihir
Publicado: (2011) -
Efficacy and Safety of Inhalation Sedation during Office Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
por: Lee, Chunghyun, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Kimura Disease with Lacrimal Sac and Nasolacrimal Duct Involvement: A Case Report
por: Byeon, Hyeong Ju, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
por: Kato, Kumiko, et al.
Publicado: (2014)