Cargando…
Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease?
Compared with other primates, humans sleep less and have a much higher prevalence of Alzheimer ’s disease (AD) pathology. This article reviews evidence relevant to the hypothesis that natural selection for shorter sleep time in humans has compromised the efficacy of physiological mechanisms that pro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emph/eow035 |
_version_ | 1782519923603406848 |
---|---|
author | Nesse, Randolph M Finch, Caleb E Nunn, Charles L |
author_facet | Nesse, Randolph M Finch, Caleb E Nunn, Charles L |
author_sort | Nesse, Randolph M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compared with other primates, humans sleep less and have a much higher prevalence of Alzheimer ’s disease (AD) pathology. This article reviews evidence relevant to the hypothesis that natural selection for shorter sleep time in humans has compromised the efficacy of physiological mechanisms that protect against AD during sleep. In particular, the glymphatic system drains interstitial fluid from the brain, removing extra-cellular amyloid beta (eAβ) twice as fast during sleep. In addition, melatonin—a peptide hormone that increases markedly during sleep—is an effective antioxidant that inhibits the polymerization of soluble eAβ into insoluble amyloid fibrils that are associated with AD. Sleep deprivation increases plaque formation and AD, which itself disrupts sleep, potentially creating a positive feedback cycle. These and other physiological benefits of sleep may be compromised by short sleep durations. Our hypothesis highlights possible long-term side effects of medications that reduce sleep, and may lead to potential new strategies for preventing and treating AD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5381352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53813522017-04-10 Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? Nesse, Randolph M Finch, Caleb E Nunn, Charles L Evol Med Public Health Invited Commentary Compared with other primates, humans sleep less and have a much higher prevalence of Alzheimer ’s disease (AD) pathology. This article reviews evidence relevant to the hypothesis that natural selection for shorter sleep time in humans has compromised the efficacy of physiological mechanisms that protect against AD during sleep. In particular, the glymphatic system drains interstitial fluid from the brain, removing extra-cellular amyloid beta (eAβ) twice as fast during sleep. In addition, melatonin—a peptide hormone that increases markedly during sleep—is an effective antioxidant that inhibits the polymerization of soluble eAβ into insoluble amyloid fibrils that are associated with AD. Sleep deprivation increases plaque formation and AD, which itself disrupts sleep, potentially creating a positive feedback cycle. These and other physiological benefits of sleep may be compromised by short sleep durations. Our hypothesis highlights possible long-term side effects of medications that reduce sleep, and may lead to potential new strategies for preventing and treating AD. Oxford University Press 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5381352/ /pubmed/28096295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emph/eow035 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Foundation for Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Commentary Nesse, Randolph M Finch, Caleb E Nunn, Charles L Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? |
title | Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? |
title_full | Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? |
title_fullStr | Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? |
title_short | Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease? |
title_sort | does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to alzheimer’s disease? |
topic | Invited Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emph/eow035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nesserandolphm doesselectionforshortsleepdurationexplainhumanvulnerabilitytoalzheimersdisease AT finchcalebe doesselectionforshortsleepdurationexplainhumanvulnerabilitytoalzheimersdisease AT nunncharlesl doesselectionforshortsleepdurationexplainhumanvulnerabilitytoalzheimersdisease |