Cargando…
The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates
The abundance and diversity of the LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon differ greatly among vertebrates. Mammalian genomes contain hundreds of thousands L1s that have accumulated since the origin of mammals. A single group of very similar elements is active at a time in mammals, thus a single lineage of act...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28175298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw247 |
_version_ | 1782519946764353536 |
---|---|
author | Boissinot, Stéphane Sookdeo, Akash |
author_facet | Boissinot, Stéphane Sookdeo, Akash |
author_sort | Boissinot, Stéphane |
collection | PubMed |
description | The abundance and diversity of the LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon differ greatly among vertebrates. Mammalian genomes contain hundreds of thousands L1s that have accumulated since the origin of mammals. A single group of very similar elements is active at a time in mammals, thus a single lineage of active families has evolved in this group. In contrast, non-mammalian genomes (fish, amphibians, reptiles) harbor a large diversity of concurrently transposing families, which are all represented by very small number of recently inserted copies. Why the pattern of diversity and abundance of L1 is so different among vertebrates remains unknown. To address this issue, we performed a detailed analysis of the evolution of active L1 in 14 mammals and in 3 non-mammalian vertebrate model species. We examined the evolution of base composition and codon bias, the general structure, and the evolution of the different domains of L1 (5′UTR, ORF1, ORF2, 3′UTR). L1s differ substantially in length, base composition, and structure among vertebrates. The most variation is found in the 5′UTR, which is longer in amniotes, and in the ORF1, which tend to evolve faster in mammals. The highly divergent L1 families of lizard, frog, and fish share species-specific features suggesting that they are subjected to the same functional constraints imposed by their host. The relative conservation of the 5′UTR and ORF1 in non-mammalian vertebrates suggests that the repression of transposition by the host does not act in a sequence-specific manner and did not result in an arms race, as is observed in mammals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5381506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53815062017-04-10 The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates Boissinot, Stéphane Sookdeo, Akash Genome Biol Evol Research Article The abundance and diversity of the LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon differ greatly among vertebrates. Mammalian genomes contain hundreds of thousands L1s that have accumulated since the origin of mammals. A single group of very similar elements is active at a time in mammals, thus a single lineage of active families has evolved in this group. In contrast, non-mammalian genomes (fish, amphibians, reptiles) harbor a large diversity of concurrently transposing families, which are all represented by very small number of recently inserted copies. Why the pattern of diversity and abundance of L1 is so different among vertebrates remains unknown. To address this issue, we performed a detailed analysis of the evolution of active L1 in 14 mammals and in 3 non-mammalian vertebrate model species. We examined the evolution of base composition and codon bias, the general structure, and the evolution of the different domains of L1 (5′UTR, ORF1, ORF2, 3′UTR). L1s differ substantially in length, base composition, and structure among vertebrates. The most variation is found in the 5′UTR, which is longer in amniotes, and in the ORF1, which tend to evolve faster in mammals. The highly divergent L1 families of lizard, frog, and fish share species-specific features suggesting that they are subjected to the same functional constraints imposed by their host. The relative conservation of the 5′UTR and ORF1 in non-mammalian vertebrates suggests that the repression of transposition by the host does not act in a sequence-specific manner and did not result in an arms race, as is observed in mammals. Oxford University Press 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5381506/ /pubmed/28175298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw247 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boissinot, Stéphane Sookdeo, Akash The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates |
title | The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates |
title_full | The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates |
title_fullStr | The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates |
title_full_unstemmed | The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates |
title_short | The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates |
title_sort | evolution of line-1 in vertebrates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28175298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boissinotstephane theevolutionofline1invertebrates AT sookdeoakash theevolutionofline1invertebrates AT boissinotstephane evolutionofline1invertebrates AT sookdeoakash evolutionofline1invertebrates |