Cargando…

Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods

BACKGROUND: Prior research about the sexual and reproductive health of young women has relied mostly on self-reported survey studies. Thus, participant recruitment using Web-based methods can improve sexual and reproductive health research about cervical cancer prevention. In our prior study, we rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motoki, Yoko, Miyagi, Etsuko, Taguri, Masataka, Asai-Sato, Mikiko, Enomoto, Takayuki, Wark, John Dennis, Garland, Suzanne Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28283466
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7048
_version_ 1782519987646234624
author Motoki, Yoko
Miyagi, Etsuko
Taguri, Masataka
Asai-Sato, Mikiko
Enomoto, Takayuki
Wark, John Dennis
Garland, Suzanne Marie
author_facet Motoki, Yoko
Miyagi, Etsuko
Taguri, Masataka
Asai-Sato, Mikiko
Enomoto, Takayuki
Wark, John Dennis
Garland, Suzanne Marie
author_sort Motoki, Yoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior research about the sexual and reproductive health of young women has relied mostly on self-reported survey studies. Thus, participant recruitment using Web-based methods can improve sexual and reproductive health research about cervical cancer prevention. In our prior study, we reported that Facebook is a promising way to reach young women for sexual and reproductive health research. However, it remains unknown whether Web-based or other conventional recruitment methods (ie, face-to-face or flyer distribution) yield comparable survey responses from similar participants. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a survey to determine whether there was a difference in the sexual and reproductive health survey responses of young Japanese women based on recruitment methods: social media–based and conventional methods. METHODS: From July 2012 to March 2013 (9 months), we invited women of ages 16-35 years in Kanagawa, Japan, to complete a Web-based questionnaire. They were recruited through either a social media–based (social networking site, SNS, group) or by conventional methods (conventional group). All participants enrolled were required to fill out and submit their responses through a Web-based questionnaire about their sexual and reproductive health for cervical cancer prevention. RESULTS: Of the 243 participants, 52.3% (127/243) were recruited by SNS, whereas 47.7% (116/243) were recruited by conventional methods. We found no differences between recruitment methods in responses to behaviors and attitudes to sexual and reproductive health survey, although more participants from the conventional group (15%, 14/95) chose not to answer the age of first intercourse compared with those from the SNS group (5.2%, 6/116; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found between recruitment methods in the responses of young Japanese women to a Web–based sexual and reproductive health survey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5381766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53817662017-04-10 Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods Motoki, Yoko Miyagi, Etsuko Taguri, Masataka Asai-Sato, Mikiko Enomoto, Takayuki Wark, John Dennis Garland, Suzanne Marie J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Prior research about the sexual and reproductive health of young women has relied mostly on self-reported survey studies. Thus, participant recruitment using Web-based methods can improve sexual and reproductive health research about cervical cancer prevention. In our prior study, we reported that Facebook is a promising way to reach young women for sexual and reproductive health research. However, it remains unknown whether Web-based or other conventional recruitment methods (ie, face-to-face or flyer distribution) yield comparable survey responses from similar participants. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a survey to determine whether there was a difference in the sexual and reproductive health survey responses of young Japanese women based on recruitment methods: social media–based and conventional methods. METHODS: From July 2012 to March 2013 (9 months), we invited women of ages 16-35 years in Kanagawa, Japan, to complete a Web-based questionnaire. They were recruited through either a social media–based (social networking site, SNS, group) or by conventional methods (conventional group). All participants enrolled were required to fill out and submit their responses through a Web-based questionnaire about their sexual and reproductive health for cervical cancer prevention. RESULTS: Of the 243 participants, 52.3% (127/243) were recruited by SNS, whereas 47.7% (116/243) were recruited by conventional methods. We found no differences between recruitment methods in responses to behaviors and attitudes to sexual and reproductive health survey, although more participants from the conventional group (15%, 14/95) chose not to answer the age of first intercourse compared with those from the SNS group (5.2%, 6/116; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found between recruitment methods in the responses of young Japanese women to a Web–based sexual and reproductive health survey. JMIR Publications 2017-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5381766/ /pubmed/28283466 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7048 Text en ©Yoko Motoki, Etsuko Miyagi, Masataka Taguri, Mikiko Asai-Sato, Takayuki Enomoto, John Dennis Wark, Suzanne Marie Garland. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.03.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Motoki, Yoko
Miyagi, Etsuko
Taguri, Masataka
Asai-Sato, Mikiko
Enomoto, Takayuki
Wark, John Dennis
Garland, Suzanne Marie
Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods
title Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods
title_full Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods
title_short Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods
title_sort comparison of different recruitment methods for sexual and reproductive health research: social media–based versus conventional methods
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28283466
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7048
work_keys_str_mv AT motokiyoko comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods
AT miyagietsuko comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods
AT tagurimasataka comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods
AT asaisatomikiko comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods
AT enomototakayuki comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods
AT warkjohndennis comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods
AT garlandsuzannemarie comparisonofdifferentrecruitmentmethodsforsexualandreproductivehealthresearchsocialmediabasedversusconventionalmethods