Cargando…

Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain

OBJECTIVE: In the UK, women are requested to attend a cervical cancer test every 3 years as part of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. This analysis compares the determinants of a cervical cancer screening examination with the determinants of a GP visit in the same year and investigates if cervic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labeit, Alexander Michael, Peinemann, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174363
_version_ 1782520002376630272
author Labeit, Alexander Michael
Peinemann, Frank
author_facet Labeit, Alexander Michael
Peinemann, Frank
author_sort Labeit, Alexander Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In the UK, women are requested to attend a cervical cancer test every 3 years as part of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. This analysis compares the determinants of a cervical cancer screening examination with the determinants of a GP visit in the same year and investigates if cervical cancer screening participation is more likely for women who visit their GP. METHODS: A recursive probit model was used to analyse the determinants of GP visits and cervical cancer screening examinations. GP visits were considered to be endogenous in the cervical cancer screening examination. The analysed sample consisted of 52,551 observations from 8,386 women of the British Household Panel Survey. RESULTS: The analysis showed that a higher education level and a worsening self-perceived health status increased the probability of a GP visit, whereas smoking decreased the probability of a GP visit. GP visits enhanced the uptake of a cervical cancer screening examination in the same period. The only variables which had the same positive effect on both dependent variables were higher education and living with a partner. The probability of a cervical cancer screening examination increased also with previous cervical cancer screening examinations and being in the recommended age groups. All other variables had different results for the uptake of a GP visit or a cervical cancer screening examination. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the determinants of visiting a GP and cervical cancer screening examination differ from each other and a GP visit enhances the uptake of a smear test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5381856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53818562017-04-19 Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain Labeit, Alexander Michael Peinemann, Frank PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: In the UK, women are requested to attend a cervical cancer test every 3 years as part of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. This analysis compares the determinants of a cervical cancer screening examination with the determinants of a GP visit in the same year and investigates if cervical cancer screening participation is more likely for women who visit their GP. METHODS: A recursive probit model was used to analyse the determinants of GP visits and cervical cancer screening examinations. GP visits were considered to be endogenous in the cervical cancer screening examination. The analysed sample consisted of 52,551 observations from 8,386 women of the British Household Panel Survey. RESULTS: The analysis showed that a higher education level and a worsening self-perceived health status increased the probability of a GP visit, whereas smoking decreased the probability of a GP visit. GP visits enhanced the uptake of a cervical cancer screening examination in the same period. The only variables which had the same positive effect on both dependent variables were higher education and living with a partner. The probability of a cervical cancer screening examination increased also with previous cervical cancer screening examinations and being in the recommended age groups. All other variables had different results for the uptake of a GP visit or a cervical cancer screening examination. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the determinants of visiting a GP and cervical cancer screening examination differ from each other and a GP visit enhances the uptake of a smear test. Public Library of Science 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5381856/ /pubmed/28379990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174363 Text en © 2017 Labeit, Peinemann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Labeit, Alexander Michael
Peinemann, Frank
Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain
title Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain
title_full Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain
title_fullStr Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain
title_short Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain
title_sort determinants of a gp visit and cervical cancer screening examination in great britain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174363
work_keys_str_mv AT labeitalexandermichael determinantsofagpvisitandcervicalcancerscreeningexaminationingreatbritain
AT peinemannfrank determinantsofagpvisitandcervicalcancerscreeningexaminationingreatbritain