Cargando…

Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data

BACKGROUND: The National Research Council’s vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century anticipates that points of departure (PODs) for establishing human exposure guidelines in future risk assessments will increasingly be based on in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) data. OBJECTIVES: The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sand, Salomon, Parham, Fred, Portier, Christopher J., Tice, Raymond R., Krewski, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP408
_version_ 1782520027789918208
author Sand, Salomon
Parham, Fred
Portier, Christopher J.
Tice, Raymond R.
Krewski, Daniel
author_facet Sand, Salomon
Parham, Fred
Portier, Christopher J.
Tice, Raymond R.
Krewski, Daniel
author_sort Sand, Salomon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National Research Council’s vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century anticipates that points of departure (PODs) for establishing human exposure guidelines in future risk assessments will increasingly be based on in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) data. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare different PODs for HTS data. Specifically, benchmark doses (BMDs) were compared to the signal-to-noise crossover dose (SNCD), which has been suggested as the lowest dose applicable as a POD. METHODS: Hill models were fit to > 10,000 in vitro concentration–response curves, obtained for > 1,400 chemicals tested as part of the U.S. Tox21 Phase I effort. BMDs and lower confidence limits on the BMDs (BMDLs) corresponding to extra effects (i.e., changes in response relative to the maximum response) of 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% were estimated for > 8,000 curves, along with BMDs and BMDLs corresponding to additional effects (i.e., absolute changes in response) of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%. The SNCD, defined as the dose where the ratio between the additional effect and the difference between the upper and lower bounds of the two-sided 90% confidence interval on absolute effect was 1, 0.67, and 0.5, respectively, was also calculated and compared with the BMDLs. RESULTS: The BMDL(40), BMDL(25), and BMDL(18), defined in terms of extra effect, corresponded to the SNCD(1.0), SNCD(0.67), and SNCD(0.5), respectively, at the median. Similarly, the BMDL(25), BMDL(17), and BMDL(13), defined in terms of additional effect, corresponded to the SNCD(1.0), SNCD(0.67), and SNCD(0.5), respectively, at the median. CONCLUSIONS: The SNCD may serve as a reference level that guides the determination of standardized BMDs for risk assessment based on HTS concentration–response data. The SNCD may also have application as a POD for low-dose extrapolation. CITATION: Sand S, Parham F, Portier CJ, Tice RR, Krewski D. 2017. Comparison of points of departure for health risk assessment based on high-throughput screening data. Environ Health Perspect 125:623–633; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP408
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5381992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53819922017-04-15 Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data Sand, Salomon Parham, Fred Portier, Christopher J. Tice, Raymond R. Krewski, Daniel Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: The National Research Council’s vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century anticipates that points of departure (PODs) for establishing human exposure guidelines in future risk assessments will increasingly be based on in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) data. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare different PODs for HTS data. Specifically, benchmark doses (BMDs) were compared to the signal-to-noise crossover dose (SNCD), which has been suggested as the lowest dose applicable as a POD. METHODS: Hill models were fit to > 10,000 in vitro concentration–response curves, obtained for > 1,400 chemicals tested as part of the U.S. Tox21 Phase I effort. BMDs and lower confidence limits on the BMDs (BMDLs) corresponding to extra effects (i.e., changes in response relative to the maximum response) of 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% were estimated for > 8,000 curves, along with BMDs and BMDLs corresponding to additional effects (i.e., absolute changes in response) of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%. The SNCD, defined as the dose where the ratio between the additional effect and the difference between the upper and lower bounds of the two-sided 90% confidence interval on absolute effect was 1, 0.67, and 0.5, respectively, was also calculated and compared with the BMDLs. RESULTS: The BMDL(40), BMDL(25), and BMDL(18), defined in terms of extra effect, corresponded to the SNCD(1.0), SNCD(0.67), and SNCD(0.5), respectively, at the median. Similarly, the BMDL(25), BMDL(17), and BMDL(13), defined in terms of additional effect, corresponded to the SNCD(1.0), SNCD(0.67), and SNCD(0.5), respectively, at the median. CONCLUSIONS: The SNCD may serve as a reference level that guides the determination of standardized BMDs for risk assessment based on HTS concentration–response data. The SNCD may also have application as a POD for low-dose extrapolation. CITATION: Sand S, Parham F, Portier CJ, Tice RR, Krewski D. 2017. Comparison of points of departure for health risk assessment based on high-throughput screening data. Environ Health Perspect 125:623–633; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP408 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016-07-06 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5381992/ /pubmed/27384688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP408 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Sand, Salomon
Parham, Fred
Portier, Christopher J.
Tice, Raymond R.
Krewski, Daniel
Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data
title Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data
title_full Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data
title_fullStr Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data
title_short Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data
title_sort comparison of points of departure for health risk assessment based on high-throughput screening data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP408
work_keys_str_mv AT sandsalomon comparisonofpointsofdepartureforhealthriskassessmentbasedonhighthroughputscreeningdata
AT parhamfred comparisonofpointsofdepartureforhealthriskassessmentbasedonhighthroughputscreeningdata
AT portierchristopherj comparisonofpointsofdepartureforhealthriskassessmentbasedonhighthroughputscreeningdata
AT ticeraymondr comparisonofpointsofdepartureforhealthriskassessmentbasedonhighthroughputscreeningdata
AT krewskidaniel comparisonofpointsofdepartureforhealthriskassessmentbasedonhighthroughputscreeningdata