Cargando…

Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome

BACKGROUND: The term “exposome” was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Kristine K., Marder, Elizabeth, Balshaw, David M., Cui, Yuxia, Lynes, Michael A., Patti, Gary J., Rappaport, Stephen M., Shaughnessy, Daniel T., Vrijheid, Martine, Barr, Dana Boyd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP474
_version_ 1782520028890923008
author Dennis, Kristine K.
Marder, Elizabeth
Balshaw, David M.
Cui, Yuxia
Lynes, Michael A.
Patti, Gary J.
Rappaport, Stephen M.
Shaughnessy, Daniel T.
Vrijheid, Martine
Barr, Dana Boyd
author_facet Dennis, Kristine K.
Marder, Elizabeth
Balshaw, David M.
Cui, Yuxia
Lynes, Michael A.
Patti, Gary J.
Rappaport, Stephen M.
Shaughnessy, Daniel T.
Vrijheid, Martine
Barr, Dana Boyd
author_sort Dennis, Kristine K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The term “exposome” was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to describe why traditional and nontraditional (exposomic) biomonitoring are both critical in studies aiming to capture the exposome and to make recommendations on how to transition exposure research toward exposomic approaches. We describe the biomonitoring needs of exposome research and approaches and recommendations that will help fill the gaps in the current science. DISCUSSION: Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring approaches have key advantages and disadvantages for assessing exposure. Exposomic approaches differ from traditional biomonitoring methods in that they can include all exposures of potential health significance, whether from endogenous or exogenous sources. Issues of sample availability and quality, identification of unknown analytes, capture of nonpersistent chemicals, integration of methods, and statistical assessment of increasingly complex data sets remain challenges that must continue to be addressed. CONCLUSIONS: To understand the complexity of exposures faced throughout the lifespan, both traditional and nontraditional biomonitoring methods should be used. Through hybrid approaches and the integration of emerging techniques, biomonitoring strategies can be maximized in research to define the exposome. CITATION: Dennis KK, Marder E, Balshaw DM, Cui Y, Lynes MA, Patti GJ, Rappaport SM, Shaughnessy DT, Vrijheid M, Barr DB. 2017. Biomonitoring in the era of the exposome. Environ Health Perspect 125:502–510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP474
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5381997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53819972017-04-15 Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome Dennis, Kristine K. Marder, Elizabeth Balshaw, David M. Cui, Yuxia Lynes, Michael A. Patti, Gary J. Rappaport, Stephen M. Shaughnessy, Daniel T. Vrijheid, Martine Barr, Dana Boyd Environ Health Perspect Commentary BACKGROUND: The term “exposome” was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to describe why traditional and nontraditional (exposomic) biomonitoring are both critical in studies aiming to capture the exposome and to make recommendations on how to transition exposure research toward exposomic approaches. We describe the biomonitoring needs of exposome research and approaches and recommendations that will help fill the gaps in the current science. DISCUSSION: Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring approaches have key advantages and disadvantages for assessing exposure. Exposomic approaches differ from traditional biomonitoring methods in that they can include all exposures of potential health significance, whether from endogenous or exogenous sources. Issues of sample availability and quality, identification of unknown analytes, capture of nonpersistent chemicals, integration of methods, and statistical assessment of increasingly complex data sets remain challenges that must continue to be addressed. CONCLUSIONS: To understand the complexity of exposures faced throughout the lifespan, both traditional and nontraditional biomonitoring methods should be used. Through hybrid approaches and the integration of emerging techniques, biomonitoring strategies can be maximized in research to define the exposome. CITATION: Dennis KK, Marder E, Balshaw DM, Cui Y, Lynes MA, Patti GJ, Rappaport SM, Shaughnessy DT, Vrijheid M, Barr DB. 2017. Biomonitoring in the era of the exposome. Environ Health Perspect 125:502–510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP474 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016-07-06 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5381997/ /pubmed/27385067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP474 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Commentary
Dennis, Kristine K.
Marder, Elizabeth
Balshaw, David M.
Cui, Yuxia
Lynes, Michael A.
Patti, Gary J.
Rappaport, Stephen M.
Shaughnessy, Daniel T.
Vrijheid, Martine
Barr, Dana Boyd
Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
title Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
title_full Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
title_fullStr Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
title_full_unstemmed Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
title_short Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
title_sort biomonitoring in the era of the exposome
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP474
work_keys_str_mv AT denniskristinek biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT marderelizabeth biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT balshawdavidm biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT cuiyuxia biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT lynesmichaela biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT pattigaryj biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT rappaportstephenm biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT shaughnessydanielt biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT vrijheidmartine biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome
AT barrdanaboyd biomonitoringintheeraoftheexposome