Cargando…

Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the cost of production and the relative weight of the different production parameters is very important in pig farming. The goals of the present work were 1) to describe reliable reference values for production parameters and pig production cost from 2010 to 2014, 2) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocadembosch, J., Amador, J., Bernaus, J., Font, J., Fraile, L. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0027-0
_version_ 1782520090512588800
author Rocadembosch, J.
Amador, J.
Bernaus, J.
Font, J.
Fraile, L. J.
author_facet Rocadembosch, J.
Amador, J.
Bernaus, J.
Font, J.
Fraile, L. J.
author_sort Rocadembosch, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment of the cost of production and the relative weight of the different production parameters is very important in pig farming. The goals of the present work were 1) to describe reliable reference values for production parameters and pig production cost from 2010 to 2014, 2) to describe their temporal evolution and 3) to determine the influence of the pig company size on them. Between 61 and 107 pig production companies from Spain were included in this study from 2010 to 2014. These companies sent data on feed consumption, number of pig produced, expenses and census every month. Sip consultors SL standardized collected data and calculate cost and production parameters to obtain values comparables between the different pig production companies. The collected data each month were merged to obtain a yearly average value taking into account the pig production flow each month. A suitable statistical analysis was carried out to tackle the goals. RESULTS: The production performance has been continuously improving in the piglet production and fattening phase from 2010 to 2014. Thus, the number of piglets by sow and year will increase 0.5 pigs by year and the total feed conversion rate will decrease approximately 0.03 kg feed/kg gain by year in the future if the same tendency continues. However, feed price has been steadily increasing from 2010 to 2012 and decreasing afterwards and the total cost per kilogram produced has followed a similar pattern. This result highlights the relevance of the feed price in the final cost in spite of continuous improvement in production performance across years. Finally, pig company size affected most of the production parameters studied. Thus, the best technical parameters were obtained for companies with less than 5000 sows. However, the opposite tendency is observed for feed price where the highest value was observed for the smallest companies. CONCLUSIONS: Pig production parameters have generally improved in the last five years but this improvement did not directly imply a reduction in pig production cost due to the high feed prices during the period 2010–2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40813-016-0027-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53823952017-04-12 Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014 Rocadembosch, J. Amador, J. Bernaus, J. Font, J. Fraile, L. J. Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: The assessment of the cost of production and the relative weight of the different production parameters is very important in pig farming. The goals of the present work were 1) to describe reliable reference values for production parameters and pig production cost from 2010 to 2014, 2) to describe their temporal evolution and 3) to determine the influence of the pig company size on them. Between 61 and 107 pig production companies from Spain were included in this study from 2010 to 2014. These companies sent data on feed consumption, number of pig produced, expenses and census every month. Sip consultors SL standardized collected data and calculate cost and production parameters to obtain values comparables between the different pig production companies. The collected data each month were merged to obtain a yearly average value taking into account the pig production flow each month. A suitable statistical analysis was carried out to tackle the goals. RESULTS: The production performance has been continuously improving in the piglet production and fattening phase from 2010 to 2014. Thus, the number of piglets by sow and year will increase 0.5 pigs by year and the total feed conversion rate will decrease approximately 0.03 kg feed/kg gain by year in the future if the same tendency continues. However, feed price has been steadily increasing from 2010 to 2012 and decreasing afterwards and the total cost per kilogram produced has followed a similar pattern. This result highlights the relevance of the feed price in the final cost in spite of continuous improvement in production performance across years. Finally, pig company size affected most of the production parameters studied. Thus, the best technical parameters were obtained for companies with less than 5000 sows. However, the opposite tendency is observed for feed price where the highest value was observed for the smallest companies. CONCLUSIONS: Pig production parameters have generally improved in the last five years but this improvement did not directly imply a reduction in pig production cost due to the high feed prices during the period 2010–2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40813-016-0027-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5382395/ /pubmed/28405437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0027-0 Text en © Rocadembosch et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rocadembosch, J.
Amador, J.
Bernaus, J.
Font, J.
Fraile, L. J.
Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
title Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
title_full Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
title_fullStr Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
title_full_unstemmed Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
title_short Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
title_sort production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010–2014
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0027-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rocademboschj productionparametersandpigproductioncosttemporalevolution20102014
AT amadorj productionparametersandpigproductioncosttemporalevolution20102014
AT bernausj productionparametersandpigproductioncosttemporalevolution20102014
AT fontj productionparametersandpigproductioncosttemporalevolution20102014
AT frailelj productionparametersandpigproductioncosttemporalevolution20102014