Cargando…

The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients

BACKGROUND: The current standard for Prostate Cancer (PCa) detection in biopsy-naïve men consists of 10–12 systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance. This approach leads to underdiagnosis and undergrading of significant PCa while insignificant PCa may be overdiagnosed. The recent developments in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Postema, A. W., Scheltema, M. J. V., Mannaerts, C. K., Van Sloun, R. J. G., Idzenga, T., Mischi, M., Engelbrecht, M. R. E., De la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H., Wijkstra, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0213-7
_version_ 1782520092051898368
author Postema, A. W.
Scheltema, M. J. V.
Mannaerts, C. K.
Van Sloun, R. J. G.
Idzenga, T.
Mischi, M.
Engelbrecht, M. R. E.
De la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
Wijkstra, H.
author_facet Postema, A. W.
Scheltema, M. J. V.
Mannaerts, C. K.
Van Sloun, R. J. G.
Idzenga, T.
Mischi, M.
Engelbrecht, M. R. E.
De la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
Wijkstra, H.
author_sort Postema, A. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current standard for Prostate Cancer (PCa) detection in biopsy-naïve men consists of 10–12 systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance. This approach leads to underdiagnosis and undergrading of significant PCa while insignificant PCa may be overdiagnosed. The recent developments in MRI and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) imaging have sparked an increasing interest in PCa imaging with the ultimate goal of replacing these “blind” systematic biopsies with reliable imaging-based targeted biopsies. METHODS/DESIGN: In this trial, we evaluate and compare the PCa detection rates of multiparametric (mp)MRI-targeted biopsies, CEUS-targeted biopsies and systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance in the same patients. After informed consent, 299 biopsy-naïve men will undergo mpMRI scanning and CEUS imaging 1 week prior to the prostate biopsy procedure. During the biopsy procedure, a systematic transrectal 12-core biopsy will be performed by one operator blinded for the imaging results and targeted biopsy procedure. Subsequently a maximum of 4 CEUS-targeted biopsies and/or 4 mpMRI-targeted biopsies of predefined locations determined by an expert CEUS reader using quantification techniques and an expert radiologist, respectively, will be taken by a second operator using an MRI-US fusion device. The primary outcome is the detection rate of PCa (all grades) and clinically significant PCa (defined as Gleason score ≥7) compared between the three biopsy protocols. DISCUSSION: This trial compares the detection rate of (clinically significant) PCa, between both traditional systematic biopsies and targeted biopsies based on predefined regions of interest identified by two promising imaging technologies. It follows published recommendations on study design for the evaluation of imaging guided prostate biopsy techniques, minimizing bias and allowing data pooling. It is the first trial to combine mpMRI imaging and advanced CEUS imaging with quantification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects registration number NL52851.018.15, registered on 3 Nov 2015. Clinicaltrials.gov database registration number NCT02831920, retrospectively registered on 5 July 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53824022017-04-10 The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients Postema, A. W. Scheltema, M. J. V. Mannaerts, C. K. Van Sloun, R. J. G. Idzenga, T. Mischi, M. Engelbrecht, M. R. E. De la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. Wijkstra, H. BMC Urol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The current standard for Prostate Cancer (PCa) detection in biopsy-naïve men consists of 10–12 systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance. This approach leads to underdiagnosis and undergrading of significant PCa while insignificant PCa may be overdiagnosed. The recent developments in MRI and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) imaging have sparked an increasing interest in PCa imaging with the ultimate goal of replacing these “blind” systematic biopsies with reliable imaging-based targeted biopsies. METHODS/DESIGN: In this trial, we evaluate and compare the PCa detection rates of multiparametric (mp)MRI-targeted biopsies, CEUS-targeted biopsies and systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance in the same patients. After informed consent, 299 biopsy-naïve men will undergo mpMRI scanning and CEUS imaging 1 week prior to the prostate biopsy procedure. During the biopsy procedure, a systematic transrectal 12-core biopsy will be performed by one operator blinded for the imaging results and targeted biopsy procedure. Subsequently a maximum of 4 CEUS-targeted biopsies and/or 4 mpMRI-targeted biopsies of predefined locations determined by an expert CEUS reader using quantification techniques and an expert radiologist, respectively, will be taken by a second operator using an MRI-US fusion device. The primary outcome is the detection rate of PCa (all grades) and clinically significant PCa (defined as Gleason score ≥7) compared between the three biopsy protocols. DISCUSSION: This trial compares the detection rate of (clinically significant) PCa, between both traditional systematic biopsies and targeted biopsies based on predefined regions of interest identified by two promising imaging technologies. It follows published recommendations on study design for the evaluation of imaging guided prostate biopsy techniques, minimizing bias and allowing data pooling. It is the first trial to combine mpMRI imaging and advanced CEUS imaging with quantification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects registration number NL52851.018.15, registered on 3 Nov 2015. Clinicaltrials.gov database registration number NCT02831920, retrospectively registered on 5 July 2016. BioMed Central 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5382402/ /pubmed/28381220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0213-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Postema, A. W.
Scheltema, M. J. V.
Mannaerts, C. K.
Van Sloun, R. J. G.
Idzenga, T.
Mischi, M.
Engelbrecht, M. R. E.
De la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
Wijkstra, H.
The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
title The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
title_full The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
title_fullStr The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
title_full_unstemmed The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
title_short The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
title_sort prostate cancer detection rates of ceus-targeted versus mri-targeted versus systematic trus-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0213-7
work_keys_str_mv AT postemaaw theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT scheltemamjv theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT mannaertsck theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT vanslounrjg theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT idzengat theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT mischim theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT engelbrechtmre theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT delarosettejjmch theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT wijkstrah theprostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT postemaaw prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT scheltemamjv prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT mannaertsck prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT vanslounrjg prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT idzengat prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT mischim prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT engelbrechtmre prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT delarosettejjmch prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients
AT wijkstrah prostatecancerdetectionratesofceustargetedversusmritargetedversussystematictrusguidedbiopsiesinbiopsynaivemenaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrialusingthesamepatients