Cargando…

Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows

BACKGROUND: In commercial pig production, sows are often vaccinated several times per gestation period, resulting in reduced welfare. This preliminary experiment investigated whether the needle-free IDAL vaccinator improves welfare through reduction of stress markers, improvement of behavioural and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temple, Déborah, Escribano, Damián, Jiménez, Marta, Mainau, Eva, Cerón, José J., Manteca, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0056-3
_version_ 1782520104704016384
author Temple, Déborah
Escribano, Damián
Jiménez, Marta
Mainau, Eva
Cerón, José J.
Manteca, Xavier
author_facet Temple, Déborah
Escribano, Damián
Jiménez, Marta
Mainau, Eva
Cerón, José J.
Manteca, Xavier
author_sort Temple, Déborah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In commercial pig production, sows are often vaccinated several times per gestation period, resulting in reduced welfare. This preliminary experiment investigated whether the needle-free IDAL vaccinator improves welfare through reduction of stress markers, improvement of behavioural and health parameters compared to traditional needle-syringe method. RESULTS: Two treatments (IDAL and NEEDLE) in 6 replicate pens of gestating sows (15 sows per pen) were evaluated using Porcilis® PRRS. The frequency of sows exhibiting an acute fear (or pain) response at the time of injection was significantly lower in the IDAL sows for the four indicators studied (high pitch vocalizations, IDAL = 15.4% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 56, P < 0.0001; retreat attempts, IDAL = 2.6% vs. NEEDLE = 56.5%, χ2 = 28, P < 0.0001; turning back, IDAL = 5.1% vs. NEEDLE = 69.6%, χ2 = 36, P < 0.0001; change in behaviour, IDAL = 18% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 53, P < 0.001). Sows in the NEEDLE vaccination group had a decreased (P = 0.03) activity the day after vaccination compared to IDAL sows. No significant difference was observed for the other active behaviours and resting postures. Fearful reaction towards the assessor significantly (χ2 = 12, P = 0.001) increased in NEEDLE sows compared to IDAL sows the day after vaccination. At 48 h post-vaccination, IDAL sows tended to have lower blood C-reactive protein levels (IDAL = 21.3 μg/mL vs. NEEDLE = 35.8 μg/mL, P = 0.06) compared to NEEDLE sows. Blood Haptoglobin levels did not differ significantly between treatments 48 h post-vaccination. Chromogranin A tended to show a lower increase after the IDAL treatment, whereas salivary alpha-amylase and salivary cortisol did not differ between treatments when measured 25 min post-vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination is a promising strategy to reduce fear and pain reaction of gestating sows during vaccination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53824582017-04-12 Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows Temple, Déborah Escribano, Damián Jiménez, Marta Mainau, Eva Cerón, José J. Manteca, Xavier Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: In commercial pig production, sows are often vaccinated several times per gestation period, resulting in reduced welfare. This preliminary experiment investigated whether the needle-free IDAL vaccinator improves welfare through reduction of stress markers, improvement of behavioural and health parameters compared to traditional needle-syringe method. RESULTS: Two treatments (IDAL and NEEDLE) in 6 replicate pens of gestating sows (15 sows per pen) were evaluated using Porcilis® PRRS. The frequency of sows exhibiting an acute fear (or pain) response at the time of injection was significantly lower in the IDAL sows for the four indicators studied (high pitch vocalizations, IDAL = 15.4% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 56, P < 0.0001; retreat attempts, IDAL = 2.6% vs. NEEDLE = 56.5%, χ2 = 28, P < 0.0001; turning back, IDAL = 5.1% vs. NEEDLE = 69.6%, χ2 = 36, P < 0.0001; change in behaviour, IDAL = 18% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 53, P < 0.001). Sows in the NEEDLE vaccination group had a decreased (P = 0.03) activity the day after vaccination compared to IDAL sows. No significant difference was observed for the other active behaviours and resting postures. Fearful reaction towards the assessor significantly (χ2 = 12, P = 0.001) increased in NEEDLE sows compared to IDAL sows the day after vaccination. At 48 h post-vaccination, IDAL sows tended to have lower blood C-reactive protein levels (IDAL = 21.3 μg/mL vs. NEEDLE = 35.8 μg/mL, P = 0.06) compared to NEEDLE sows. Blood Haptoglobin levels did not differ significantly between treatments 48 h post-vaccination. Chromogranin A tended to show a lower increase after the IDAL treatment, whereas salivary alpha-amylase and salivary cortisol did not differ between treatments when measured 25 min post-vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination is a promising strategy to reduce fear and pain reaction of gestating sows during vaccination. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5382458/ /pubmed/28405465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0056-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Temple, Déborah
Escribano, Damián
Jiménez, Marta
Mainau, Eva
Cerón, José J.
Manteca, Xavier
Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
title Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
title_full Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
title_fullStr Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
title_short Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
title_sort effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0056-3
work_keys_str_mv AT templedeborah effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows
AT escribanodamian effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows
AT jimenezmarta effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows
AT mainaueva effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows
AT ceronjosej effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows
AT mantecaxavier effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows