Cargando…
Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows
BACKGROUND: In commercial pig production, sows are often vaccinated several times per gestation period, resulting in reduced welfare. This preliminary experiment investigated whether the needle-free IDAL vaccinator improves welfare through reduction of stress markers, improvement of behavioural and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0056-3 |
_version_ | 1782520104704016384 |
---|---|
author | Temple, Déborah Escribano, Damián Jiménez, Marta Mainau, Eva Cerón, José J. Manteca, Xavier |
author_facet | Temple, Déborah Escribano, Damián Jiménez, Marta Mainau, Eva Cerón, José J. Manteca, Xavier |
author_sort | Temple, Déborah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In commercial pig production, sows are often vaccinated several times per gestation period, resulting in reduced welfare. This preliminary experiment investigated whether the needle-free IDAL vaccinator improves welfare through reduction of stress markers, improvement of behavioural and health parameters compared to traditional needle-syringe method. RESULTS: Two treatments (IDAL and NEEDLE) in 6 replicate pens of gestating sows (15 sows per pen) were evaluated using Porcilis® PRRS. The frequency of sows exhibiting an acute fear (or pain) response at the time of injection was significantly lower in the IDAL sows for the four indicators studied (high pitch vocalizations, IDAL = 15.4% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 56, P < 0.0001; retreat attempts, IDAL = 2.6% vs. NEEDLE = 56.5%, χ2 = 28, P < 0.0001; turning back, IDAL = 5.1% vs. NEEDLE = 69.6%, χ2 = 36, P < 0.0001; change in behaviour, IDAL = 18% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 53, P < 0.001). Sows in the NEEDLE vaccination group had a decreased (P = 0.03) activity the day after vaccination compared to IDAL sows. No significant difference was observed for the other active behaviours and resting postures. Fearful reaction towards the assessor significantly (χ2 = 12, P = 0.001) increased in NEEDLE sows compared to IDAL sows the day after vaccination. At 48 h post-vaccination, IDAL sows tended to have lower blood C-reactive protein levels (IDAL = 21.3 μg/mL vs. NEEDLE = 35.8 μg/mL, P = 0.06) compared to NEEDLE sows. Blood Haptoglobin levels did not differ significantly between treatments 48 h post-vaccination. Chromogranin A tended to show a lower increase after the IDAL treatment, whereas salivary alpha-amylase and salivary cortisol did not differ between treatments when measured 25 min post-vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination is a promising strategy to reduce fear and pain reaction of gestating sows during vaccination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5382458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53824582017-04-12 Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows Temple, Déborah Escribano, Damián Jiménez, Marta Mainau, Eva Cerón, José J. Manteca, Xavier Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: In commercial pig production, sows are often vaccinated several times per gestation period, resulting in reduced welfare. This preliminary experiment investigated whether the needle-free IDAL vaccinator improves welfare through reduction of stress markers, improvement of behavioural and health parameters compared to traditional needle-syringe method. RESULTS: Two treatments (IDAL and NEEDLE) in 6 replicate pens of gestating sows (15 sows per pen) were evaluated using Porcilis® PRRS. The frequency of sows exhibiting an acute fear (or pain) response at the time of injection was significantly lower in the IDAL sows for the four indicators studied (high pitch vocalizations, IDAL = 15.4% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 56, P < 0.0001; retreat attempts, IDAL = 2.6% vs. NEEDLE = 56.5%, χ2 = 28, P < 0.0001; turning back, IDAL = 5.1% vs. NEEDLE = 69.6%, χ2 = 36, P < 0.0001; change in behaviour, IDAL = 18% vs. NEEDLE = 95.6%, χ2 = 53, P < 0.001). Sows in the NEEDLE vaccination group had a decreased (P = 0.03) activity the day after vaccination compared to IDAL sows. No significant difference was observed for the other active behaviours and resting postures. Fearful reaction towards the assessor significantly (χ2 = 12, P = 0.001) increased in NEEDLE sows compared to IDAL sows the day after vaccination. At 48 h post-vaccination, IDAL sows tended to have lower blood C-reactive protein levels (IDAL = 21.3 μg/mL vs. NEEDLE = 35.8 μg/mL, P = 0.06) compared to NEEDLE sows. Blood Haptoglobin levels did not differ significantly between treatments 48 h post-vaccination. Chromogranin A tended to show a lower increase after the IDAL treatment, whereas salivary alpha-amylase and salivary cortisol did not differ between treatments when measured 25 min post-vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination is a promising strategy to reduce fear and pain reaction of gestating sows during vaccination. BioMed Central 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5382458/ /pubmed/28405465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0056-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Temple, Déborah Escribano, Damián Jiménez, Marta Mainau, Eva Cerón, José J. Manteca, Xavier Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
title | Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
title_full | Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
title_fullStr | Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
title_short | Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
title_sort | effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0056-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT templedeborah effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows AT escribanodamian effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows AT jimenezmarta effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows AT mainaueva effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows AT ceronjosej effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows AT mantecaxavier effectoftheneedlefreeintradermalapplicationofliquidsvaccinationonthewelfareofpregnantsows |