Cargando…

Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study

BACKGROUND: One possible way to support raising large litter sizes in pigs is to offer supplementary, artificial milk ad libitum in the farrowing pen in addition to the sow’s milk. In order to evaluate the potential use of this method and its effects on performance and health, supplemented (n = 60)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pustal, J., Traulsen, I., Preißler, R., Müller, K., Beilage, T. große, Börries, U., Kemper, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-015-0008-8
_version_ 1782520104923168768
author Pustal, J.
Traulsen, I.
Preißler, R.
Müller, K.
Beilage, T. große
Börries, U.
Kemper, N.
author_facet Pustal, J.
Traulsen, I.
Preißler, R.
Müller, K.
Beilage, T. große
Börries, U.
Kemper, N.
author_sort Pustal, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One possible way to support raising large litter sizes in pigs is to offer supplementary, artificial milk ad libitum in the farrowing pen in addition to the sow’s milk. In order to evaluate the potential use of this method and its effects on performance and health, supplemented (n = 60) and control sows (n = 60) with their litters were tested over 15 batches in one herd during one year. In the supplemented group (SG), piglets had access to supplementary milk in addition to sow’s milk from their 2(nd) day of life until weaning (day 27). The litters of SG sows were adjusted to contain as many piglets as the sow had functional teats, whereas in the control group (CG), piglets were set to the number of functional teats minus one, due to animal welfare reasons. CASE PRESENTATION: With supplementary milk provision, the weaning of large litters was achieved without any negative impacts on performance and health. On average, 13.5 and 12.4 piglets were weaned in SG and CG, respectively (P < 0.05). While average weaning weights (SG: 7.8 kg v. CG: 7.8 kg; P > 0.05) and average daily weight gain of the piglets (SG: 0.25 kg v. CG: 0.25 kg; P > 0.05) did not differ, total litter weight was consequently higher in SG than in CG (104.9 kg v. 96.7 kg; P < 0.001). The average milk replacer intakes were 1.1 kg milk powder per day and batch, and varied significantly between the “warm” and “cold” seasons (1.5 v. 0.9 kg milk powder per batch and day; P < 0.001). No significant differences in the mortality rate or the occurrence of diarrhoea were detected in the piglets of both SG and CG (P > 0.05). With regard to documented medical treatments, facial lesions were treated less frequently in piglets of SG (46 v. 32 treatments; P < 0.05). There was no effect of supplementary milk on the loss of body weight, backfat thickness and body condition score of the sows (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To summarise, in the presented case offering ad libitum supplementary, artificial milk supported the sow in raising large litters by compensating possible negative impacts of high piglet numbers on the weight gain of piglets and the body condition of the sows.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53824592017-04-12 Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study Pustal, J. Traulsen, I. Preißler, R. Müller, K. Beilage, T. große Börries, U. Kemper, N. Porcine Health Manag Case Report BACKGROUND: One possible way to support raising large litter sizes in pigs is to offer supplementary, artificial milk ad libitum in the farrowing pen in addition to the sow’s milk. In order to evaluate the potential use of this method and its effects on performance and health, supplemented (n = 60) and control sows (n = 60) with their litters were tested over 15 batches in one herd during one year. In the supplemented group (SG), piglets had access to supplementary milk in addition to sow’s milk from their 2(nd) day of life until weaning (day 27). The litters of SG sows were adjusted to contain as many piglets as the sow had functional teats, whereas in the control group (CG), piglets were set to the number of functional teats minus one, due to animal welfare reasons. CASE PRESENTATION: With supplementary milk provision, the weaning of large litters was achieved without any negative impacts on performance and health. On average, 13.5 and 12.4 piglets were weaned in SG and CG, respectively (P < 0.05). While average weaning weights (SG: 7.8 kg v. CG: 7.8 kg; P > 0.05) and average daily weight gain of the piglets (SG: 0.25 kg v. CG: 0.25 kg; P > 0.05) did not differ, total litter weight was consequently higher in SG than in CG (104.9 kg v. 96.7 kg; P < 0.001). The average milk replacer intakes were 1.1 kg milk powder per day and batch, and varied significantly between the “warm” and “cold” seasons (1.5 v. 0.9 kg milk powder per batch and day; P < 0.001). No significant differences in the mortality rate or the occurrence of diarrhoea were detected in the piglets of both SG and CG (P > 0.05). With regard to documented medical treatments, facial lesions were treated less frequently in piglets of SG (46 v. 32 treatments; P < 0.05). There was no effect of supplementary milk on the loss of body weight, backfat thickness and body condition score of the sows (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To summarise, in the presented case offering ad libitum supplementary, artificial milk supported the sow in raising large litters by compensating possible negative impacts of high piglet numbers on the weight gain of piglets and the body condition of the sows. BioMed Central 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5382459/ /pubmed/28405419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-015-0008-8 Text en © Pustal et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Pustal, J.
Traulsen, I.
Preißler, R.
Müller, K.
Beilage, T. große
Börries, U.
Kemper, N.
Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
title Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
title_full Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
title_fullStr Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
title_short Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
title_sort providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-015-0008-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pustalj providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy
AT traulseni providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy
AT preißlerr providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy
AT mullerk providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy
AT beilagetgroße providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy
AT borriesu providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy
AT kempern providingsupplementaryartificialmilkforlargelittersduringlactationeffectsonperformanceandhealthofsowsandpigletsacasestudy