Cargando…

Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets

BACKGROUND: Feed contaminated with feces from infected pigs is believed to be a potential route of transmission of porcine delta coronavirus (PDCoV). The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of commercial feed additives (e.i., acids, salt and sugar) to swine feed can be an effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cottingim, Katie M., Verma, Harsha, Urriola, Pedro E., Sampedro, Fernando, Shurson, Gerald C., Goyal, Sagar M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0048-8
_version_ 1782520112958406656
author Cottingim, Katie M.
Verma, Harsha
Urriola, Pedro E.
Sampedro, Fernando
Shurson, Gerald C.
Goyal, Sagar M.
author_facet Cottingim, Katie M.
Verma, Harsha
Urriola, Pedro E.
Sampedro, Fernando
Shurson, Gerald C.
Goyal, Sagar M.
author_sort Cottingim, Katie M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feed contaminated with feces from infected pigs is believed to be a potential route of transmission of porcine delta coronavirus (PDCoV). The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of commercial feed additives (e.i., acids, salt and sugar) to swine feed can be an effective strategy to inactive PDCoV. RESULTS: Six commercial feed acids (UltraAcid P, Activate DA, KEMGEST, Acid Booster, Luprosil, and Amasil), salt, and sugar were evaluated. The acids were added at the recommended concentrations to 5 g aliquots of complete feed, which were also inoculated with 1 mL of PDCoV and incubated for 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days. In another experiment, double the recommended concentrations of these additives were also added to the feed samples and incubated for 0, 1, 3, 7, and 10 days. All samples were stored at room temperature (~25 °C) followed by removal of aliquots at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days. Any surviving virus was eluted in a buffer solution and then titrated in swine testicular cells. Feed samples without any additive were used as controls. Both Weibull and log-linear kinetic models were used to analyze virus survival curves. The presence of a tail in the virus inactivation curves indicated deviations from the linear behavior and hence, the Weibull model was chosen for characterizing the inactivation responses due to the better fit. At recommended concentrations, delta values (days to decrease virus concentration by 1 log) ranged from 0.62–1.72 days, but there were no differences on virus survival among feed samples with or without additives at the manufacturers recommended concentrations. Doubling the concentration of the additives reduced the delta value to ≤ 0.28 days (P < 0.05) for all the additives except for Amasil (delta values of 0.86 vs. 4.95 days). Feed additives that contained phosphoric acid, citric acid, or fumaric acid were the most effective in reducing virus survival, although none of the additives completely inactivated the virus by 10- days post-inoculation. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial feed additives (acidifiers and salt) may be utilized as a strategy to decrease risk of PDCoV in feed, specially, commercial feed acidifiers at double the recommended concentrations reduced PDCoV survival in complete feed during storage at room temperature. However, none of these additives completely inactivated the virus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53824972017-04-12 Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets Cottingim, Katie M. Verma, Harsha Urriola, Pedro E. Sampedro, Fernando Shurson, Gerald C. Goyal, Sagar M. Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Feed contaminated with feces from infected pigs is believed to be a potential route of transmission of porcine delta coronavirus (PDCoV). The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of commercial feed additives (e.i., acids, salt and sugar) to swine feed can be an effective strategy to inactive PDCoV. RESULTS: Six commercial feed acids (UltraAcid P, Activate DA, KEMGEST, Acid Booster, Luprosil, and Amasil), salt, and sugar were evaluated. The acids were added at the recommended concentrations to 5 g aliquots of complete feed, which were also inoculated with 1 mL of PDCoV and incubated for 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days. In another experiment, double the recommended concentrations of these additives were also added to the feed samples and incubated for 0, 1, 3, 7, and 10 days. All samples were stored at room temperature (~25 °C) followed by removal of aliquots at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days. Any surviving virus was eluted in a buffer solution and then titrated in swine testicular cells. Feed samples without any additive were used as controls. Both Weibull and log-linear kinetic models were used to analyze virus survival curves. The presence of a tail in the virus inactivation curves indicated deviations from the linear behavior and hence, the Weibull model was chosen for characterizing the inactivation responses due to the better fit. At recommended concentrations, delta values (days to decrease virus concentration by 1 log) ranged from 0.62–1.72 days, but there were no differences on virus survival among feed samples with or without additives at the manufacturers recommended concentrations. Doubling the concentration of the additives reduced the delta value to ≤ 0.28 days (P < 0.05) for all the additives except for Amasil (delta values of 0.86 vs. 4.95 days). Feed additives that contained phosphoric acid, citric acid, or fumaric acid were the most effective in reducing virus survival, although none of the additives completely inactivated the virus by 10- days post-inoculation. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial feed additives (acidifiers and salt) may be utilized as a strategy to decrease risk of PDCoV in feed, specially, commercial feed acidifiers at double the recommended concentrations reduced PDCoV survival in complete feed during storage at room temperature. However, none of these additives completely inactivated the virus. BioMed Central 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5382497/ /pubmed/28405461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0048-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cottingim, Katie M.
Verma, Harsha
Urriola, Pedro E.
Sampedro, Fernando
Shurson, Gerald C.
Goyal, Sagar M.
Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
title Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
title_full Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
title_fullStr Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
title_full_unstemmed Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
title_short Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
title_sort feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0048-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cottingimkatiem feedadditivesdecreasesurvivalofdeltacoronavirusinnurserypigdiets
AT vermaharsha feedadditivesdecreasesurvivalofdeltacoronavirusinnurserypigdiets
AT urriolapedroe feedadditivesdecreasesurvivalofdeltacoronavirusinnurserypigdiets
AT sampedrofernando feedadditivesdecreasesurvivalofdeltacoronavirusinnurserypigdiets
AT shursongeraldc feedadditivesdecreasesurvivalofdeltacoronavirusinnurserypigdiets
AT goyalsagarm feedadditivesdecreasesurvivalofdeltacoronavirusinnurserypigdiets