Cargando…

An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial

BACKGROUND: Contaminated complete feed and porcine plasma are risk factors for PEDV introduction to farms and a liquid antimicrobial has been proven useful for reducing risk. This study provides information on the survivability of PEDV across common swine feed ingredients in the presence or absence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dee, Scott, Neill, Casey, Clement, Travis, Singrey, Aaron, Christopher-Hennings, Jane, Nelson, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-015-0003-0
_version_ 1782520118004154368
author Dee, Scott
Neill, Casey
Clement, Travis
Singrey, Aaron
Christopher-Hennings, Jane
Nelson, Eric
author_facet Dee, Scott
Neill, Casey
Clement, Travis
Singrey, Aaron
Christopher-Hennings, Jane
Nelson, Eric
author_sort Dee, Scott
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contaminated complete feed and porcine plasma are risk factors for PEDV introduction to farms and a liquid antimicrobial has been proven useful for reducing risk. This study provides information on the survivability of PEDV across common swine feed ingredients in the presence or absence of the liquid antimicrobial. RESULTS: Eighteen ingredients commonly included in commercial swine diets were selected, including 3 grain sources (corn, soybean meal (SBM), dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS)), 5 porcine by-products (spray-dried plasma, purified plasma, intestinal mucosa, meat and bone meal and red blood cells (RBCs)), 3 vitamin/trace mineral (VTM) mixes (sow, nursery, finishing), 2 fat sources (choice white grease and soy oil), 3 synthetic amino acids (lysine HCL, D/L methionine, threonine), as well as limestone and dry choline chloride. Complete feed and stock PEDV served as controls. Thirty grams of each ingredient were inoculated with 2 mL PEDV. A matched set of samples were treated with the formaldehyde-based liquid antimicrobial SalCURB® (LA). All samples (n = 320) were stored outdoors under winter time ambient conditions for 30 days. Samples were submitted on 1, 7, 14 and 30 days post-inoculation (DPI) and tested by PCR and virus isolation (VI). All VI-negative samples were tested by swine bioassay. Viable PEDV was detected by VI or swine bioassay at 1, 7, 14 and 30 DPI from SBM, DDGS, meat & bone meal, RBCs, lysine HCL, D/L methionine, choice white grease, choline chloride, complete feed and stock virus control and at 7 DPI in limestone and at 14 DPI in threonine. Supplementary testing of complete feed and SBM indicated viable virus out to 45 and 180 DPI, respectively. All other samples were negative by VI and bioassay. In contrast, treatment with LA inactivated PEDV across all ingredients on 1 DPI and induced RNA reduction over time. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, PEDV viability in feed was influenced by ingredient with extended survival in SBM. Furthermore, LA treatment rendered virus inactive, independent of ingredient type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53825232017-04-12 An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial Dee, Scott Neill, Casey Clement, Travis Singrey, Aaron Christopher-Hennings, Jane Nelson, Eric Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Contaminated complete feed and porcine plasma are risk factors for PEDV introduction to farms and a liquid antimicrobial has been proven useful for reducing risk. This study provides information on the survivability of PEDV across common swine feed ingredients in the presence or absence of the liquid antimicrobial. RESULTS: Eighteen ingredients commonly included in commercial swine diets were selected, including 3 grain sources (corn, soybean meal (SBM), dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS)), 5 porcine by-products (spray-dried plasma, purified plasma, intestinal mucosa, meat and bone meal and red blood cells (RBCs)), 3 vitamin/trace mineral (VTM) mixes (sow, nursery, finishing), 2 fat sources (choice white grease and soy oil), 3 synthetic amino acids (lysine HCL, D/L methionine, threonine), as well as limestone and dry choline chloride. Complete feed and stock PEDV served as controls. Thirty grams of each ingredient were inoculated with 2 mL PEDV. A matched set of samples were treated with the formaldehyde-based liquid antimicrobial SalCURB® (LA). All samples (n = 320) were stored outdoors under winter time ambient conditions for 30 days. Samples were submitted on 1, 7, 14 and 30 days post-inoculation (DPI) and tested by PCR and virus isolation (VI). All VI-negative samples were tested by swine bioassay. Viable PEDV was detected by VI or swine bioassay at 1, 7, 14 and 30 DPI from SBM, DDGS, meat & bone meal, RBCs, lysine HCL, D/L methionine, choice white grease, choline chloride, complete feed and stock virus control and at 7 DPI in limestone and at 14 DPI in threonine. Supplementary testing of complete feed and SBM indicated viable virus out to 45 and 180 DPI, respectively. All other samples were negative by VI and bioassay. In contrast, treatment with LA inactivated PEDV across all ingredients on 1 DPI and induced RNA reduction over time. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, PEDV viability in feed was influenced by ingredient with extended survival in SBM. Furthermore, LA treatment rendered virus inactive, independent of ingredient type. BioMed Central 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5382523/ /pubmed/28405416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-015-0003-0 Text en © Dee et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dee, Scott
Neill, Casey
Clement, Travis
Singrey, Aaron
Christopher-Hennings, Jane
Nelson, Eric
An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
title An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
title_full An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
title_fullStr An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
title_short An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
title_sort evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-015-0003-0
work_keys_str_mv AT deescott anevaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT neillcasey anevaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT clementtravis anevaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT singreyaaron anevaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT christopherhenningsjane anevaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT nelsoneric anevaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT deescott evaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT neillcasey evaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT clementtravis evaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT singreyaaron evaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT christopherhenningsjane evaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial
AT nelsoneric evaluationofporcineepidemicdiarrheavirussurvivalinindividualfeedingredientsinthepresenceorabsenceofaliquidantimicrobial