Cargando…

Teres major muscle – insertion footprint

Teres major muscle (TM) and latissimus dorsi muscle (LD) are frequently used in muscle transfers around the shoulder girdle. Some authors have suggested harvesting techniques in which the muscle is detached in continuity with a bone segment. Information on the bony attachment footprint of these musc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dancker, Malte, Lambert, Simon, Brenner, Erich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28185265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.12593
_version_ 1782520131464724480
author Dancker, Malte
Lambert, Simon
Brenner, Erich
author_facet Dancker, Malte
Lambert, Simon
Brenner, Erich
author_sort Dancker, Malte
collection PubMed
description Teres major muscle (TM) and latissimus dorsi muscle (LD) are frequently used in muscle transfers around the shoulder girdle. Some authors have suggested harvesting techniques in which the muscle is detached in continuity with a bone segment. Information on the bony attachment footprint of these muscles is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the region of attachment of the TM to facilitate safe and complete harvesting with a bone segment where it is indicated, and to determine the relationship of the TM footprint with that of the LD. Twenty‐eight upper extremities of 14 human cadavers (six female, eight male) were investigated during the students’ dissection course in the winter term 2012. The attachment footprints were photographed and the images were processed with imageJ Version 1.46r. The TM attachment footprint at the crest of the lesser tubercle had an average dimension of 187 ± 89 mm(2). It was 49.6 ± 7.9 mm long and 7.4 ± 2.5 mm wide. The bony attachment of the LD within the bicipital groove, just below the tendon of the long head of the biceps muscle, had an area of 94 ± 37 mm(2). It was 36.5 ± 8 mm long and 3.7 ± 1.2 mm wide. Both muscles were separated by 4.4 ± 1.7 mm and their attachments overlapped in the craniocaudal direction by 24.4 ± 12.4 mm. Earlier studies have investigated the dimensions of the muscles’ tendons close to the attachment not the bony attachment itself. The dimension of the attachment of the TM was larger than that of the LD. The ratio between the footprint areas was approximately 2:1. This information should be considered by surgeons undertaking transfers, which include a bony segment of the muscle insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5382588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53825882017-04-11 Teres major muscle – insertion footprint Dancker, Malte Lambert, Simon Brenner, Erich J Anat Original Articles Teres major muscle (TM) and latissimus dorsi muscle (LD) are frequently used in muscle transfers around the shoulder girdle. Some authors have suggested harvesting techniques in which the muscle is detached in continuity with a bone segment. Information on the bony attachment footprint of these muscles is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the region of attachment of the TM to facilitate safe and complete harvesting with a bone segment where it is indicated, and to determine the relationship of the TM footprint with that of the LD. Twenty‐eight upper extremities of 14 human cadavers (six female, eight male) were investigated during the students’ dissection course in the winter term 2012. The attachment footprints were photographed and the images were processed with imageJ Version 1.46r. The TM attachment footprint at the crest of the lesser tubercle had an average dimension of 187 ± 89 mm(2). It was 49.6 ± 7.9 mm long and 7.4 ± 2.5 mm wide. The bony attachment of the LD within the bicipital groove, just below the tendon of the long head of the biceps muscle, had an area of 94 ± 37 mm(2). It was 36.5 ± 8 mm long and 3.7 ± 1.2 mm wide. Both muscles were separated by 4.4 ± 1.7 mm and their attachments overlapped in the craniocaudal direction by 24.4 ± 12.4 mm. Earlier studies have investigated the dimensions of the muscles’ tendons close to the attachment not the bony attachment itself. The dimension of the attachment of the TM was larger than that of the LD. The ratio between the footprint areas was approximately 2:1. This information should be considered by surgeons undertaking transfers, which include a bony segment of the muscle insertion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-09 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5382588/ /pubmed/28185265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.12593 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dancker, Malte
Lambert, Simon
Brenner, Erich
Teres major muscle – insertion footprint
title Teres major muscle – insertion footprint
title_full Teres major muscle – insertion footprint
title_fullStr Teres major muscle – insertion footprint
title_full_unstemmed Teres major muscle – insertion footprint
title_short Teres major muscle – insertion footprint
title_sort teres major muscle – insertion footprint
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28185265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.12593
work_keys_str_mv AT danckermalte teresmajormuscleinsertionfootprint
AT lambertsimon teresmajormuscleinsertionfootprint
AT brennererich teresmajormuscleinsertionfootprint