Cargando…

Effective cataract surgical coverage: An indicator for measuring quality-of-care in the context of Universal Health Coverage

OBJECTIVE: To define and demonstrate effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC), a candidate UHC indicator that combines a coverage measure (cataract surgical coverage, CSC) with quality (post-operative visual outcome). METHODS: All Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys with datase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramke, Jacqueline, Gilbert, Clare E., Lee, Arier C., Ackland, Peter, Limburg, Hans, Foster, Allen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5382971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28249047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172342
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To define and demonstrate effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC), a candidate UHC indicator that combines a coverage measure (cataract surgical coverage, CSC) with quality (post-operative visual outcome). METHODS: All Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys with datasets on the online RAAB Repository on April 1 2016 were downloaded. The most recent study from each country was included. By country, cataract surgical outcome (CSO(Good), 6/18 or better; CSO(Poor), worse than 6/60), CSC (operated cataract as a proportion of operable plus operated cataract) and eCSC (operated cataract and a good outcome as a proportion of operable plus operated cataract) were calculated. The association between CSC and CSO was assessed by linear regression. Gender inequality in CSC and eCSC was calculated. FINDINGS: Datasets from 20 countries were included (2005–2013; 67,337 participants; 5,474 cataract surgeries). Median CSC was 53.7% (inter-quartile range[IQR] 46.1–66.6%), CSO(Good) was 58.9% (IQR 53.7–67.6%) and CSO(Poor) was 17.7% (IQR 11.3–21.1%). Coverage and quality of cataract surgery were moderately associated—every 1% CSC increase was associated with a 0.46% CSO(Good) increase and 0.28% CSO(Poor) decrease. Median eCSC was 36.7% (IQR 30.2–50.6%), approximately one-third lower than the median CSC. Women tended to fare worse than men, and gender inequality was slightly higher for eCSC (4.6% IQR 0.5–7.1%) than for CSC (median 2.3% IQR -1.5–11.6%). CONCLUSION: eCSC allows monitoring of quality in conjunction with coverage of cataract surgery. In the surveys analysed, on average 36.7% of people who could benefit from cataract surgery had undergone surgery and obtained a good visual outcome.