Cargando…

Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a voxel-wise analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may differentiate between progressive disease (PD) and pseudoprogression (PsP) in patients with high-grade glioma using the parametric response map, a newly introduced p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reimer, Caroline, Deike, Katerina, Graf, Markus, Reimer, Peter, Wiestler, Benedikt, Floca, Ralf Omar, Kickingereder, Philipp, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Wick, Wolfgang, Bendszus, Martin, Radbruch, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174620
_version_ 1782520243647676416
author Reimer, Caroline
Deike, Katerina
Graf, Markus
Reimer, Peter
Wiestler, Benedikt
Floca, Ralf Omar
Kickingereder, Philipp
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Wick, Wolfgang
Bendszus, Martin
Radbruch, Alexander
author_facet Reimer, Caroline
Deike, Katerina
Graf, Markus
Reimer, Peter
Wiestler, Benedikt
Floca, Ralf Omar
Kickingereder, Philipp
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Wick, Wolfgang
Bendszus, Martin
Radbruch, Alexander
author_sort Reimer, Caroline
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a voxel-wise analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may differentiate between progressive disease (PD) and pseudoprogression (PsP) in patients with high-grade glioma using the parametric response map, a newly introduced postprocessing tool. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with proven PD and seven patients with PsP were identified in this retrospective feasibility study. For all patients ADC baseline and follow-up maps on four subsequent MRIs were available. ADC maps were coregistered on contrast enhanced T1-weighted follow-up images. Subsequently, enhancement in the follow-up contrast enhanced T1-weighted image was manually delineated and a reference region of interest (ROI) was drawn in the contralateral white matter. Both ROIs were transferred to the ADC images. Relative ADC (rADC) (baseline)/reference ROI values and rADC (follow up)/reference ROI values were calculated for each voxel within the ROI. The corresponding voxels of rADC (follow up) and rADC (baseline) were subtracted and the percentage of all voxels within the ROI that exceeded the threshold of 0.25 was quantified. RESULTS: rADC voxels showed a decrease of 59.2% (1(st) quartile (Q1) 36.7; 3(rd) quartile (Q3) 78.6) above 0.25 in patients with PD and 18.6% (Q1 3.04; Q3 26.5) in patients with PsP (p = 0.005). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the optimal decreasing rADC cut-off value for identifying PD of > 27.05% (area under the curve 0.844±0.065, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.86, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This feasibility study shows that the assessment of rADC using parametric response maps might be a promising approach to contribute to the differentiation between PD and PsP. Further research in larger patient cohorts is necessary to finally determine its clinical utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5383222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53832222017-05-03 Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps Reimer, Caroline Deike, Katerina Graf, Markus Reimer, Peter Wiestler, Benedikt Floca, Ralf Omar Kickingereder, Philipp Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Wick, Wolfgang Bendszus, Martin Radbruch, Alexander PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a voxel-wise analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may differentiate between progressive disease (PD) and pseudoprogression (PsP) in patients with high-grade glioma using the parametric response map, a newly introduced postprocessing tool. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with proven PD and seven patients with PsP were identified in this retrospective feasibility study. For all patients ADC baseline and follow-up maps on four subsequent MRIs were available. ADC maps were coregistered on contrast enhanced T1-weighted follow-up images. Subsequently, enhancement in the follow-up contrast enhanced T1-weighted image was manually delineated and a reference region of interest (ROI) was drawn in the contralateral white matter. Both ROIs were transferred to the ADC images. Relative ADC (rADC) (baseline)/reference ROI values and rADC (follow up)/reference ROI values were calculated for each voxel within the ROI. The corresponding voxels of rADC (follow up) and rADC (baseline) were subtracted and the percentage of all voxels within the ROI that exceeded the threshold of 0.25 was quantified. RESULTS: rADC voxels showed a decrease of 59.2% (1(st) quartile (Q1) 36.7; 3(rd) quartile (Q3) 78.6) above 0.25 in patients with PD and 18.6% (Q1 3.04; Q3 26.5) in patients with PsP (p = 0.005). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the optimal decreasing rADC cut-off value for identifying PD of > 27.05% (area under the curve 0.844±0.065, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.86, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This feasibility study shows that the assessment of rADC using parametric response maps might be a promising approach to contribute to the differentiation between PD and PsP. Further research in larger patient cohorts is necessary to finally determine its clinical utility. Public Library of Science 2017-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5383222/ /pubmed/28384170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174620 Text en © 2017 Reimer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reimer, Caroline
Deike, Katerina
Graf, Markus
Reimer, Peter
Wiestler, Benedikt
Floca, Ralf Omar
Kickingereder, Philipp
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Wick, Wolfgang
Bendszus, Martin
Radbruch, Alexander
Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps
title Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps
title_full Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps
title_fullStr Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps
title_short Differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using ADC parametric response maps
title_sort differentiation of pseudoprogression and real progression in glioblastoma using adc parametric response maps
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174620
work_keys_str_mv AT reimercaroline differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT deikekaterina differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT grafmarkus differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT reimerpeter differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT wiestlerbenedikt differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT flocaralfomar differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT kickingerederphilipp differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT schlemmerheinzpeter differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT wickwolfgang differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT bendszusmartin differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps
AT radbruchalexander differentiationofpseudoprogressionandrealprogressioninglioblastomausingadcparametricresponsemaps