Cargando…

Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators

INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LaFollette, Megan R., O’Haire, Marguerite E., Cloutier, Sylvie, Blankenberger, Whitney B., Gaskill, Brianna N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175320
_version_ 1782520256944668672
author LaFollette, Megan R.
O’Haire, Marguerite E.
Cloutier, Sylvie
Blankenberger, Whitney B.
Gaskill, Brianna N.
author_facet LaFollette, Megan R.
O’Haire, Marguerite E.
Cloutier, Sylvie
Blankenberger, Whitney B.
Gaskill, Brianna N.
author_sort LaFollette, Megan R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current studies use a variety of methods to achieve differential results. Our objective was to systematically identify, summarize, and evaluate the research on tickling in rats to provide direction for future investigation. Our specific aims were to summarize current methods used in tickling experiments, outcomes from tickling, and moderating factors. METHODS: We systematically evaluated all articles about tickling identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Our inclusion criteria were publication in a peer-reviewed journal and collection of original, empirical data on rats using the handling method of tickling. One researcher extracted information from each article. Bias was assessed by 2 investigators using the SYRCLE bias assessment tool. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles (56 experiments) published in peer-reviewed journals about rat tickling for inclusion. A wide variety of strains, sexes, and ages of rats were included. The most common method used for tickling was cycling through 15 seconds of tickling and 15 seconds of rest for 2 minutes for 3 to 5 days. Experiments with a control for tickling (N = 22) showed that tickling increases positive vocalization, approach behavior, decreases anxiety measures, improves handling, and in some cases decreases stress hormones. Tickling juvenile, individually housed rats with a trait predisposition to respond more positively to tickling, results in the most positive outcomes. Methods to reduce bias were insufficiently reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tickling is a promising method for improving rat welfare and investigating positive affect. However, the establishment of tickling best practices is essential as the outcomes from tickling can be moderated by several factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5383284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53832842017-05-03 Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators LaFollette, Megan R. O’Haire, Marguerite E. Cloutier, Sylvie Blankenberger, Whitney B. Gaskill, Brianna N. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current studies use a variety of methods to achieve differential results. Our objective was to systematically identify, summarize, and evaluate the research on tickling in rats to provide direction for future investigation. Our specific aims were to summarize current methods used in tickling experiments, outcomes from tickling, and moderating factors. METHODS: We systematically evaluated all articles about tickling identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Our inclusion criteria were publication in a peer-reviewed journal and collection of original, empirical data on rats using the handling method of tickling. One researcher extracted information from each article. Bias was assessed by 2 investigators using the SYRCLE bias assessment tool. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles (56 experiments) published in peer-reviewed journals about rat tickling for inclusion. A wide variety of strains, sexes, and ages of rats were included. The most common method used for tickling was cycling through 15 seconds of tickling and 15 seconds of rest for 2 minutes for 3 to 5 days. Experiments with a control for tickling (N = 22) showed that tickling increases positive vocalization, approach behavior, decreases anxiety measures, improves handling, and in some cases decreases stress hormones. Tickling juvenile, individually housed rats with a trait predisposition to respond more positively to tickling, results in the most positive outcomes. Methods to reduce bias were insufficiently reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tickling is a promising method for improving rat welfare and investigating positive affect. However, the establishment of tickling best practices is essential as the outcomes from tickling can be moderated by several factors. Public Library of Science 2017-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5383284/ /pubmed/28384364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175320 Text en © 2017 LaFollette et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
LaFollette, Megan R.
O’Haire, Marguerite E.
Cloutier, Sylvie
Blankenberger, Whitney B.
Gaskill, Brianna N.
Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
title Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
title_full Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
title_fullStr Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
title_full_unstemmed Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
title_short Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
title_sort rat tickling: a systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175320
work_keys_str_mv AT lafollettemeganr ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators
AT ohairemargueritee ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators
AT cloutiersylvie ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators
AT blankenbergerwhitneyb ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators
AT gaskillbriannan ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators