Cargando…
Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175320 |
_version_ | 1782520256944668672 |
---|---|
author | LaFollette, Megan R. O’Haire, Marguerite E. Cloutier, Sylvie Blankenberger, Whitney B. Gaskill, Brianna N. |
author_facet | LaFollette, Megan R. O’Haire, Marguerite E. Cloutier, Sylvie Blankenberger, Whitney B. Gaskill, Brianna N. |
author_sort | LaFollette, Megan R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current studies use a variety of methods to achieve differential results. Our objective was to systematically identify, summarize, and evaluate the research on tickling in rats to provide direction for future investigation. Our specific aims were to summarize current methods used in tickling experiments, outcomes from tickling, and moderating factors. METHODS: We systematically evaluated all articles about tickling identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Our inclusion criteria were publication in a peer-reviewed journal and collection of original, empirical data on rats using the handling method of tickling. One researcher extracted information from each article. Bias was assessed by 2 investigators using the SYRCLE bias assessment tool. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles (56 experiments) published in peer-reviewed journals about rat tickling for inclusion. A wide variety of strains, sexes, and ages of rats were included. The most common method used for tickling was cycling through 15 seconds of tickling and 15 seconds of rest for 2 minutes for 3 to 5 days. Experiments with a control for tickling (N = 22) showed that tickling increases positive vocalization, approach behavior, decreases anxiety measures, improves handling, and in some cases decreases stress hormones. Tickling juvenile, individually housed rats with a trait predisposition to respond more positively to tickling, results in the most positive outcomes. Methods to reduce bias were insufficiently reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tickling is a promising method for improving rat welfare and investigating positive affect. However, the establishment of tickling best practices is essential as the outcomes from tickling can be moderated by several factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5383284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53832842017-05-03 Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators LaFollette, Megan R. O’Haire, Marguerite E. Cloutier, Sylvie Blankenberger, Whitney B. Gaskill, Brianna N. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current studies use a variety of methods to achieve differential results. Our objective was to systematically identify, summarize, and evaluate the research on tickling in rats to provide direction for future investigation. Our specific aims were to summarize current methods used in tickling experiments, outcomes from tickling, and moderating factors. METHODS: We systematically evaluated all articles about tickling identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Our inclusion criteria were publication in a peer-reviewed journal and collection of original, empirical data on rats using the handling method of tickling. One researcher extracted information from each article. Bias was assessed by 2 investigators using the SYRCLE bias assessment tool. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles (56 experiments) published in peer-reviewed journals about rat tickling for inclusion. A wide variety of strains, sexes, and ages of rats were included. The most common method used for tickling was cycling through 15 seconds of tickling and 15 seconds of rest for 2 minutes for 3 to 5 days. Experiments with a control for tickling (N = 22) showed that tickling increases positive vocalization, approach behavior, decreases anxiety measures, improves handling, and in some cases decreases stress hormones. Tickling juvenile, individually housed rats with a trait predisposition to respond more positively to tickling, results in the most positive outcomes. Methods to reduce bias were insufficiently reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tickling is a promising method for improving rat welfare and investigating positive affect. However, the establishment of tickling best practices is essential as the outcomes from tickling can be moderated by several factors. Public Library of Science 2017-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5383284/ /pubmed/28384364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175320 Text en © 2017 LaFollette et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article LaFollette, Megan R. O’Haire, Marguerite E. Cloutier, Sylvie Blankenberger, Whitney B. Gaskill, Brianna N. Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
title | Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
title_full | Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
title_fullStr | Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
title_full_unstemmed | Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
title_short | Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
title_sort | rat tickling: a systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lafollettemeganr ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators AT ohairemargueritee ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators AT cloutiersylvie ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators AT blankenbergerwhitneyb ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators AT gaskillbriannan ratticklingasystematicreviewofapplicationsoutcomesandmoderators |