Cargando…
The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029 |
_version_ | 1782520395469946880 |
---|---|
author | Harvey, Leonie Bousson, Matthew McLellan, Chris Lovell, Dale |
author_facet | Harvey, Leonie Bousson, Matthew McLellan, Chris Lovell, Dale |
author_sort | Harvey, Leonie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23 ± 2 years, 84 ± 16.1 kg, 178.5 ± 7.4 cm) volunteered to complete two repeated WAnT protocols (either lower body WAnT followed by an upper body WAnT or vice versa) on two separate testing occasions. The upper body WAnT was conducted on a modified electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 5% bodyweight. The lower body WAnT was conducted on an electronically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 7.5% bodyweight. Participants had a 1 minute rest period for transition between WAnTs. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. No significant differences were identified in power indices for the lower body between 30 s WAnTs. When the upper body WAnT was performed 2nd, absolute peak power (p < 0.01), mean power (p < 0.001) and relative mean power (p < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to when the upper body WAnT was performed 1st. The value of maximum revolutions per minute was significantly lower (p < 0.001) when the upper body WAnT was performed after the lower body WAnT, compared to when it was performed 1st (193.3 ± 11.4 1st vs 179.8 ± 14.4 2nd). Previous upper body sprint exercise does not significantly affect lower body sprint exercise; however, previous lower body sprint exercise severely compromises subsequent upper body sprint performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5384059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | De Gruyter Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53840592017-05-03 The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region Harvey, Leonie Bousson, Matthew McLellan, Chris Lovell, Dale J Hum Kinet Section II– Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23 ± 2 years, 84 ± 16.1 kg, 178.5 ± 7.4 cm) volunteered to complete two repeated WAnT protocols (either lower body WAnT followed by an upper body WAnT or vice versa) on two separate testing occasions. The upper body WAnT was conducted on a modified electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 5% bodyweight. The lower body WAnT was conducted on an electronically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 7.5% bodyweight. Participants had a 1 minute rest period for transition between WAnTs. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. No significant differences were identified in power indices for the lower body between 30 s WAnTs. When the upper body WAnT was performed 2nd, absolute peak power (p < 0.01), mean power (p < 0.001) and relative mean power (p < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to when the upper body WAnT was performed 1st. The value of maximum revolutions per minute was significantly lower (p < 0.001) when the upper body WAnT was performed after the lower body WAnT, compared to when it was performed 1st (193.3 ± 11.4 1st vs 179.8 ± 14.4 2nd). Previous upper body sprint exercise does not significantly affect lower body sprint exercise; however, previous lower body sprint exercise severely compromises subsequent upper body sprint performance. De Gruyter Open 2017-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5384059/ /pubmed/28469750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029 Text en © 2017 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics |
spellingShingle | Section II– Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine Harvey, Leonie Bousson, Matthew McLellan, Chris Lovell, Dale The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region |
title | The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region |
title_full | The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region |
title_short | The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region |
title_sort | effect of previous wingate performance using one body region on subsequent wingate performance using a different body region |
topic | Section II– Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harveyleonie theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT boussonmatthew theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT mclellanchris theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT lovelldale theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT harveyleonie effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT boussonmatthew effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT mclellanchris effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion AT lovelldale effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion |