Cargando…

The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region

The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvey, Leonie, Bousson, Matthew, McLellan, Chris, Lovell, Dale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029
_version_ 1782520395469946880
author Harvey, Leonie
Bousson, Matthew
McLellan, Chris
Lovell, Dale
author_facet Harvey, Leonie
Bousson, Matthew
McLellan, Chris
Lovell, Dale
author_sort Harvey, Leonie
collection PubMed
description The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23 ± 2 years, 84 ± 16.1 kg, 178.5 ± 7.4 cm) volunteered to complete two repeated WAnT protocols (either lower body WAnT followed by an upper body WAnT or vice versa) on two separate testing occasions. The upper body WAnT was conducted on a modified electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 5% bodyweight. The lower body WAnT was conducted on an electronically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 7.5% bodyweight. Participants had a 1 minute rest period for transition between WAnTs. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. No significant differences were identified in power indices for the lower body between 30 s WAnTs. When the upper body WAnT was performed 2nd, absolute peak power (p < 0.01), mean power (p < 0.001) and relative mean power (p < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to when the upper body WAnT was performed 1st. The value of maximum revolutions per minute was significantly lower (p < 0.001) when the upper body WAnT was performed after the lower body WAnT, compared to when it was performed 1st (193.3 ± 11.4 1st vs 179.8 ± 14.4 2nd). Previous upper body sprint exercise does not significantly affect lower body sprint exercise; however, previous lower body sprint exercise severely compromises subsequent upper body sprint performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5384059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53840592017-05-03 The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region Harvey, Leonie Bousson, Matthew McLellan, Chris Lovell, Dale J Hum Kinet Section II– Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine The 30 second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is the gold standard measure of anaerobic performance. The present investigation aimed to determine if a previous WAnT using one body region significantly affected a subsequent WAnT using a different body region. Twelve male university students (n = 12, 23 ± 2 years, 84 ± 16.1 kg, 178.5 ± 7.4 cm) volunteered to complete two repeated WAnT protocols (either lower body WAnT followed by an upper body WAnT or vice versa) on two separate testing occasions. The upper body WAnT was conducted on a modified electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 5% bodyweight. The lower body WAnT was conducted on an electronically braked cycle ergometer using a flywheel braking force corresponding to 7.5% bodyweight. Participants had a 1 minute rest period for transition between WAnTs. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. No significant differences were identified in power indices for the lower body between 30 s WAnTs. When the upper body WAnT was performed 2nd, absolute peak power (p < 0.01), mean power (p < 0.001) and relative mean power (p < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to when the upper body WAnT was performed 1st. The value of maximum revolutions per minute was significantly lower (p < 0.001) when the upper body WAnT was performed after the lower body WAnT, compared to when it was performed 1st (193.3 ± 11.4 1st vs 179.8 ± 14.4 2nd). Previous upper body sprint exercise does not significantly affect lower body sprint exercise; however, previous lower body sprint exercise severely compromises subsequent upper body sprint performance. De Gruyter Open 2017-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5384059/ /pubmed/28469750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029 Text en © 2017 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Section II– Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
Harvey, Leonie
Bousson, Matthew
McLellan, Chris
Lovell, Dale
The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
title The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
title_full The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
title_fullStr The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
title_short The Effect of Previous Wingate Performance Using one Body Region on Subsequent Wingate Performance Using a Different Body Region
title_sort effect of previous wingate performance using one body region on subsequent wingate performance using a different body region
topic Section II– Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0029
work_keys_str_mv AT harveyleonie theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT boussonmatthew theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT mclellanchris theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT lovelldale theeffectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT harveyleonie effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT boussonmatthew effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT mclellanchris effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion
AT lovelldale effectofpreviouswingateperformanceusingonebodyregiononsubsequentwingateperformanceusingadifferentbodyregion