Cargando…

Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study

BACKGROUND: Consumption of sugars-sweetened beverages (SSB) increases energy intake and the risk of obesity. Large packages increase consumption of food, implying that smaller bottle sizes may help curb SSB consumption, but there is a lack of relevant evidence relating to these products. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mantzari, Eleni, Hollands, Gareth J., Pechey, Rachel, Jebb, Susan, Marteau, Theresa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4214-y
_version_ 1782520408541495296
author Mantzari, Eleni
Hollands, Gareth J.
Pechey, Rachel
Jebb, Susan
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_facet Mantzari, Eleni
Hollands, Gareth J.
Pechey, Rachel
Jebb, Susan
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_sort Mantzari, Eleni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consumption of sugars-sweetened beverages (SSB) increases energy intake and the risk of obesity. Large packages increase consumption of food, implying that smaller bottle sizes may help curb SSB consumption, but there is a lack of relevant evidence relating to these products. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of different bottle sizes on SSB consumption at home. METHODS: Households in Cambridge, England, which purchased at least 2 l of regular cola drinks per week, received a set amount of cola each week for four weeks, in bottles of one of four sizes (1500 ml, 1000 ml, 500 ml, or 250 ml) in random order. The total volume received consisted of a modest excess of households’ typical weekly purchasing, but was further increased for half the study households to avoid ceiling effects. Consumption was measured by recording the number of empty bottles at the end of each week. Eligible households were invited to complete a run-in period to assess levels of active participation. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of 111 eligible households with an interest in the study completed the run-in period. The study procedures proved feasible. The target for recruitment (n = 16 households) was exceeded. Measuring consumption was feasible: over three quarters (n = 30/37) of households returned all bottles on the majority (n = 88/101) of the study weeks completed across households. The validity of this measure was compromised by guests from outside the household who drank the study cola (n = 18/37 households on 48/101 study weeks) and consumption of the study cola outside the home. Supplying enhanced volumes of cola to nine households was associated with higher consumption (11,592 ml vs 7869 ml). The intervention and study procedures were considered acceptable. Thirteen households correctly identified the study aims. CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of running a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of presenting a fixed volume of SSB in different bottle sizes on in-home consumption. However, methods that avoid consumption being influenced by the amount of cola supplied weekly by the study and that capture out of home consumption are needed before conducting a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14964130; Registered on 18th May, 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5384135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53841352017-04-12 Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study Mantzari, Eleni Hollands, Gareth J. Pechey, Rachel Jebb, Susan Marteau, Theresa M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Consumption of sugars-sweetened beverages (SSB) increases energy intake and the risk of obesity. Large packages increase consumption of food, implying that smaller bottle sizes may help curb SSB consumption, but there is a lack of relevant evidence relating to these products. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of different bottle sizes on SSB consumption at home. METHODS: Households in Cambridge, England, which purchased at least 2 l of regular cola drinks per week, received a set amount of cola each week for four weeks, in bottles of one of four sizes (1500 ml, 1000 ml, 500 ml, or 250 ml) in random order. The total volume received consisted of a modest excess of households’ typical weekly purchasing, but was further increased for half the study households to avoid ceiling effects. Consumption was measured by recording the number of empty bottles at the end of each week. Eligible households were invited to complete a run-in period to assess levels of active participation. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of 111 eligible households with an interest in the study completed the run-in period. The study procedures proved feasible. The target for recruitment (n = 16 households) was exceeded. Measuring consumption was feasible: over three quarters (n = 30/37) of households returned all bottles on the majority (n = 88/101) of the study weeks completed across households. The validity of this measure was compromised by guests from outside the household who drank the study cola (n = 18/37 households on 48/101 study weeks) and consumption of the study cola outside the home. Supplying enhanced volumes of cola to nine households was associated with higher consumption (11,592 ml vs 7869 ml). The intervention and study procedures were considered acceptable. Thirteen households correctly identified the study aims. CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of running a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of presenting a fixed volume of SSB in different bottle sizes on in-home consumption. However, methods that avoid consumption being influenced by the amount of cola supplied weekly by the study and that capture out of home consumption are needed before conducting a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14964130; Registered on 18th May, 2015. BioMed Central 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5384135/ /pubmed/28388890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4214-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mantzari, Eleni
Hollands, Gareth J.
Pechey, Rachel
Jebb, Susan
Marteau, Theresa M.
Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
title Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_full Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_fullStr Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_short Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_sort impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: a feasibility and acceptability study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4214-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mantzarieleni impactofbottlesizeoninhomeconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT hollandsgarethj impactofbottlesizeoninhomeconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT pecheyrachel impactofbottlesizeoninhomeconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT jebbsusan impactofbottlesizeoninhomeconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT marteautheresam impactofbottlesizeoninhomeconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy