Cargando…

Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications

BACKGROUND: ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis is well established for assessing how well a marker is capable of discriminating between individuals who experience disease onset and individuals who do not. The classical (standard) approach of ROC curve analysis considers event (di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamarudin, Adina Najwa, Cox, Trevor, Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0332-6
_version_ 1782520413634428928
author Kamarudin, Adina Najwa
Cox, Trevor
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
author_facet Kamarudin, Adina Najwa
Cox, Trevor
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
author_sort Kamarudin, Adina Najwa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis is well established for assessing how well a marker is capable of discriminating between individuals who experience disease onset and individuals who do not. The classical (standard) approach of ROC curve analysis considers event (disease) status and marker value for an individual as fixed over time, however in practice, both the disease status and marker value change over time. Individuals who are disease-free earlier may develop the disease later due to longer study follow-up, and also their marker value may change from baseline during follow-up. Thus, an ROC curve as a function of time is more appropriate. However, many researchers still use the standard ROC curve approach to determine the marker capability ignoring the time dependency of the disease status or the marker. METHODS: We comprehensively review currently proposed methodologies of time-dependent ROC curves which use single or longitudinal marker measurements, aiming to provide clarity in each methodology, identify software tools to carry out such analysis in practice and illustrate several applications of the methodology. We have also extended some methods to incorporate a longitudinal marker and illustrated the methodologies using a sequential dataset from the Mayo Clinic trial in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) of the liver. RESULTS: From our methodological review, we have identified 18 estimation methods of time-dependent ROC curve analyses for censored event times and three other methods can only deal with non-censored event times. Despite the considerable numbers of estimation methods, applications of the methodology in clinical studies are still lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The value of time-dependent ROC curve methods has been re-established. We have illustrated the methods in practice using currently available software and made some recommendations for future research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0332-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5384160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53841602017-04-12 Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications Kamarudin, Adina Najwa Cox, Trevor Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis is well established for assessing how well a marker is capable of discriminating between individuals who experience disease onset and individuals who do not. The classical (standard) approach of ROC curve analysis considers event (disease) status and marker value for an individual as fixed over time, however in practice, both the disease status and marker value change over time. Individuals who are disease-free earlier may develop the disease later due to longer study follow-up, and also their marker value may change from baseline during follow-up. Thus, an ROC curve as a function of time is more appropriate. However, many researchers still use the standard ROC curve approach to determine the marker capability ignoring the time dependency of the disease status or the marker. METHODS: We comprehensively review currently proposed methodologies of time-dependent ROC curves which use single or longitudinal marker measurements, aiming to provide clarity in each methodology, identify software tools to carry out such analysis in practice and illustrate several applications of the methodology. We have also extended some methods to incorporate a longitudinal marker and illustrated the methodologies using a sequential dataset from the Mayo Clinic trial in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) of the liver. RESULTS: From our methodological review, we have identified 18 estimation methods of time-dependent ROC curve analyses for censored event times and three other methods can only deal with non-censored event times. Despite the considerable numbers of estimation methods, applications of the methodology in clinical studies are still lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The value of time-dependent ROC curve methods has been re-established. We have illustrated the methods in practice using currently available software and made some recommendations for future research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0332-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5384160/ /pubmed/28388943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0332-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamarudin, Adina Najwa
Cox, Trevor
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
title Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
title_full Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
title_fullStr Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
title_full_unstemmed Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
title_short Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
title_sort time-dependent roc curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0332-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kamarudinadinanajwa timedependentroccurveanalysisinmedicalresearchcurrentmethodsandapplications
AT coxtrevor timedependentroccurveanalysisinmedicalresearchcurrentmethodsandapplications
AT kolamunnagedonaruwanthi timedependentroccurveanalysisinmedicalresearchcurrentmethodsandapplications