Cargando…

Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets on prevalence of subclinical malaria among children in the presence of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles culicifacies in Central India()

BACKGROUND: Subclinical (asymptomatic) cases of malaria could be a major barrier to the success of malaria elimination programs. This study has evaluated the impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) on the prevalence of subclinical malaria in the presence of pyrethroid resistance in the main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chourasia, Mehul Kumar, Kamaraju, Raghavendra, Kleinschmidt, Immo, Bhatt, Rajendra M., Swain, Dipak Kumar, Knox, Tessa Bellamy, Valecha, Neena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28268096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2017.02.001
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Subclinical (asymptomatic) cases of malaria could be a major barrier to the success of malaria elimination programs. This study has evaluated the impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) on the prevalence of subclinical malaria in the presence of pyrethroid resistance in the main malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies on malaria transmission among a cohort of children in villages of the Keshkal sub-district in Chhattisgarh state. METHODS: A cohort of 6582 children ages less than 14 years was enrolled from 80 study clusters. Post monsoon survey was carried out at baseline before LLIN distribution, and 5862 children were followed up in the subsequent year. Study outcomes included assessment of subclinical malarial infections and use of LLINs among the study cohort in the presence of varied levels of pyrethroid resistance. FINDINGS: In the baseline survey, the proportion of subclinical malaria was 6·1%. LLIN use during the previous night was 94·8%. Overall, prevalence of subclinical malaria was significantly reduced to 1% (p < 0·001) in the second survey. LLIN users were protected from malaria (OR: 0·25, 95% CI = 0·12–0·52, p < 0.001) and subclinical malaria (OR: 0·25, 95% CI = 0·11–0·58, p = 0·001) despite the presence of pyrethroid resistance in the study area. INTERPRETATION: In this low transmission area, sleeping under LLINs significantly reduced the burden of malaria among children. In the presence of pyrethroid resistant malaria vector, a high LLIN use of 94·5% was observed to have significantly brought down the proportion of subclinical malaria among the cohort children.