Cargando…

Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network

Research on social processes in the production of scientific output suggests that the collective research agenda of a discipline is influenced by its structural features, such as “invisible colleges” or “groups of collaborators” as well as academic “stars” that are embedded in, or connect, these res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leifeld, Philip, Wankmüller, Sandra, Berger, Valentin T. Z., Ingold, Karin, Steiner, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671
_version_ 1782520497512120320
author Leifeld, Philip
Wankmüller, Sandra
Berger, Valentin T. Z.
Ingold, Karin
Steiner, Christiane
author_facet Leifeld, Philip
Wankmüller, Sandra
Berger, Valentin T. Z.
Ingold, Karin
Steiner, Christiane
author_sort Leifeld, Philip
collection PubMed
description Research on social processes in the production of scientific output suggests that the collective research agenda of a discipline is influenced by its structural features, such as “invisible colleges” or “groups of collaborators” as well as academic “stars” that are embedded in, or connect, these research groups. Based on an encompassing dataset that takes into account multiple publication types including journals and chapters in edited volumes, we analyze the complete co-authorship network of all 1,339 researchers in German political science. Through the use of consensus graph clustering techniques and descriptive centrality measures, we identify the ten largest research clusters, their research topics, and the most central researchers who act as bridges and connect these clusters. We also aggregate the findings at the level of research organizations and consider the inter-university co-authorship network. The findings indicate that German political science is structured by multiple overlapping research clusters with a dominance of the subfields of international relations, comparative politics and political sociology. A small set of well-connected universities takes leading roles in these informal research groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5384752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53847522017-05-03 Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network Leifeld, Philip Wankmüller, Sandra Berger, Valentin T. Z. Ingold, Karin Steiner, Christiane PLoS One Research Article Research on social processes in the production of scientific output suggests that the collective research agenda of a discipline is influenced by its structural features, such as “invisible colleges” or “groups of collaborators” as well as academic “stars” that are embedded in, or connect, these research groups. Based on an encompassing dataset that takes into account multiple publication types including journals and chapters in edited volumes, we analyze the complete co-authorship network of all 1,339 researchers in German political science. Through the use of consensus graph clustering techniques and descriptive centrality measures, we identify the ten largest research clusters, their research topics, and the most central researchers who act as bridges and connect these clusters. We also aggregate the findings at the level of research organizations and consider the inter-university co-authorship network. The findings indicate that German political science is structured by multiple overlapping research clusters with a dominance of the subfields of international relations, comparative politics and political sociology. A small set of well-connected universities takes leading roles in these informal research groups. Public Library of Science 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5384752/ /pubmed/28388621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671 Text en © 2017 Leifeld et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leifeld, Philip
Wankmüller, Sandra
Berger, Valentin T. Z.
Ingold, Karin
Steiner, Christiane
Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
title Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
title_full Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
title_fullStr Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
title_full_unstemmed Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
title_short Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
title_sort collaboration patterns in the german political science co-authorship network
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671
work_keys_str_mv AT leifeldphilip collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork
AT wankmullersandra collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork
AT bergervalentintz collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork
AT ingoldkarin collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork
AT steinerchristiane collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork