Cargando…
Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
Research on social processes in the production of scientific output suggests that the collective research agenda of a discipline is influenced by its structural features, such as “invisible colleges” or “groups of collaborators” as well as academic “stars” that are embedded in, or connect, these res...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671 |
_version_ | 1782520497512120320 |
---|---|
author | Leifeld, Philip Wankmüller, Sandra Berger, Valentin T. Z. Ingold, Karin Steiner, Christiane |
author_facet | Leifeld, Philip Wankmüller, Sandra Berger, Valentin T. Z. Ingold, Karin Steiner, Christiane |
author_sort | Leifeld, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research on social processes in the production of scientific output suggests that the collective research agenda of a discipline is influenced by its structural features, such as “invisible colleges” or “groups of collaborators” as well as academic “stars” that are embedded in, or connect, these research groups. Based on an encompassing dataset that takes into account multiple publication types including journals and chapters in edited volumes, we analyze the complete co-authorship network of all 1,339 researchers in German political science. Through the use of consensus graph clustering techniques and descriptive centrality measures, we identify the ten largest research clusters, their research topics, and the most central researchers who act as bridges and connect these clusters. We also aggregate the findings at the level of research organizations and consider the inter-university co-authorship network. The findings indicate that German political science is structured by multiple overlapping research clusters with a dominance of the subfields of international relations, comparative politics and political sociology. A small set of well-connected universities takes leading roles in these informal research groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5384752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53847522017-05-03 Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network Leifeld, Philip Wankmüller, Sandra Berger, Valentin T. Z. Ingold, Karin Steiner, Christiane PLoS One Research Article Research on social processes in the production of scientific output suggests that the collective research agenda of a discipline is influenced by its structural features, such as “invisible colleges” or “groups of collaborators” as well as academic “stars” that are embedded in, or connect, these research groups. Based on an encompassing dataset that takes into account multiple publication types including journals and chapters in edited volumes, we analyze the complete co-authorship network of all 1,339 researchers in German political science. Through the use of consensus graph clustering techniques and descriptive centrality measures, we identify the ten largest research clusters, their research topics, and the most central researchers who act as bridges and connect these clusters. We also aggregate the findings at the level of research organizations and consider the inter-university co-authorship network. The findings indicate that German political science is structured by multiple overlapping research clusters with a dominance of the subfields of international relations, comparative politics and political sociology. A small set of well-connected universities takes leading roles in these informal research groups. Public Library of Science 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5384752/ /pubmed/28388621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671 Text en © 2017 Leifeld et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leifeld, Philip Wankmüller, Sandra Berger, Valentin T. Z. Ingold, Karin Steiner, Christiane Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network |
title | Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network |
title_full | Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network |
title_fullStr | Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network |
title_full_unstemmed | Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network |
title_short | Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network |
title_sort | collaboration patterns in the german political science co-authorship network |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leifeldphilip collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork AT wankmullersandra collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork AT bergervalentintz collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork AT ingoldkarin collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork AT steinerchristiane collaborationpatternsinthegermanpoliticalsciencecoauthorshipnetwork |