Cargando…

Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers

Background: The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosca, Ilaria, van der Wees, Philip J., Mot, Esther S., Wammes, Joost J.G., Jeurissen, Patrick P.T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28812803
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.109
_version_ 1782520520241053696
author Mosca, Ilaria
van der Wees, Philip J.
Mot, Esther S.
Wammes, Joost J.G.
Jeurissen, Patrick P.T.
author_facet Mosca, Ilaria
van der Wees, Philip J.
Mot, Esther S.
Wammes, Joost J.G.
Jeurissen, Patrick P.T.
author_sort Mosca, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description Background: The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent under the EU’s European Semester. Methods: This paper examines challenges related to the financial- and organizational sustainability of LTC systems in the EU. We combined a targeted literature review and a descriptive selected country analysis of: (1) public- and private funding; (2) informal care and externalities; and (3) the possible role of technology in increasing productivity. Countries were selected via purposive sampling to establish a cohort of country cases covering the spectrum of differences in LTC systems: public spending, private funding, informal care use, informal care support, and cash benefits. Results: The aging of the population, the increasing gap between availability of informal care and demand for LTC, substantial market failures of private funding for LTC, and fiscal imbalances in some countries, have led to structural reforms and enduring pressures for LTC policy-makers across the EU. Our exploration of national policies illustrates different solutions that attempt to promote fairness while stimulating efficient delivery of services. Important steps must be taken to address the sustainability of LTC. First, countries should look deeper into the possibilities of complementing public- and private funding, as well as at addressing market failures of private funding. Second, informal care externalities with spill-over into neighboring policy areas, the labor force, and formal LTC workers, should be properly addressed. Thirdly, innovations in LTC services should be stimulated to increase productivity through technology and process innovations, and to reduce costs. Conclusion: The analysis shows why it is difficult for EU Member State governments to meet all their goals for sustainable LTC, given the demographic- and fiscal circumstances, and the complexities of LTC systems. It also shows the usefulness to learn from policy design and implementation of LTC policy in other countries, within and outside the EU. Researchers can contribute by studying conditions, under which the strategies explored might deliver solutions for policy-makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5384982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53849822017-04-11 Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers Mosca, Ilaria van der Wees, Philip J. Mot, Esther S. Wammes, Joost J.G. Jeurissen, Patrick P.T. Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent under the EU’s European Semester. Methods: This paper examines challenges related to the financial- and organizational sustainability of LTC systems in the EU. We combined a targeted literature review and a descriptive selected country analysis of: (1) public- and private funding; (2) informal care and externalities; and (3) the possible role of technology in increasing productivity. Countries were selected via purposive sampling to establish a cohort of country cases covering the spectrum of differences in LTC systems: public spending, private funding, informal care use, informal care support, and cash benefits. Results: The aging of the population, the increasing gap between availability of informal care and demand for LTC, substantial market failures of private funding for LTC, and fiscal imbalances in some countries, have led to structural reforms and enduring pressures for LTC policy-makers across the EU. Our exploration of national policies illustrates different solutions that attempt to promote fairness while stimulating efficient delivery of services. Important steps must be taken to address the sustainability of LTC. First, countries should look deeper into the possibilities of complementing public- and private funding, as well as at addressing market failures of private funding. Second, informal care externalities with spill-over into neighboring policy areas, the labor force, and formal LTC workers, should be properly addressed. Thirdly, innovations in LTC services should be stimulated to increase productivity through technology and process innovations, and to reduce costs. Conclusion: The analysis shows why it is difficult for EU Member State governments to meet all their goals for sustainable LTC, given the demographic- and fiscal circumstances, and the complexities of LTC systems. It also shows the usefulness to learn from policy design and implementation of LTC policy in other countries, within and outside the EU. Researchers can contribute by studying conditions, under which the strategies explored might deliver solutions for policy-makers. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5384982/ /pubmed/28812803 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.109 Text en © 2017 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mosca, Ilaria
van der Wees, Philip J.
Mot, Esther S.
Wammes, Joost J.G.
Jeurissen, Patrick P.T.
Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
title Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
title_full Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
title_fullStr Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
title_short Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
title_sort sustainability of long-term care: puzzling tasks ahead for policy-makers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5384982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28812803
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.109
work_keys_str_mv AT moscailaria sustainabilityoflongtermcarepuzzlingtasksaheadforpolicymakers
AT vanderweesphilipj sustainabilityoflongtermcarepuzzlingtasksaheadforpolicymakers
AT motesthers sustainabilityoflongtermcarepuzzlingtasksaheadforpolicymakers
AT wammesjoostjg sustainabilityoflongtermcarepuzzlingtasksaheadforpolicymakers
AT jeurissenpatrickpt sustainabilityoflongtermcarepuzzlingtasksaheadforpolicymakers