Cargando…

A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care

BACKGROUND: Caregiving is strenuous and it may be associated with adverse psychological outcomes. During the palliative care trajectory, there are unique opportunities for providing support and preventing poor bereavement outcome. However, the tasks of palliative care staff in relation to caregivers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomsen, Kia Toft, Guldin, Mai-Britt, Nielsen, Mette Kjærgaard, Ollars, Chaitali Laura, Jensen, Anders Bonde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0196-x
_version_ 1782520530641879040
author Thomsen, Kia Toft
Guldin, Mai-Britt
Nielsen, Mette Kjærgaard
Ollars, Chaitali Laura
Jensen, Anders Bonde
author_facet Thomsen, Kia Toft
Guldin, Mai-Britt
Nielsen, Mette Kjærgaard
Ollars, Chaitali Laura
Jensen, Anders Bonde
author_sort Thomsen, Kia Toft
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caregiving is strenuous and it may be associated with adverse psychological outcomes. During the palliative care trajectory, there are unique opportunities for providing support and preventing poor bereavement outcome. However, the tasks of palliative care staff in relation to caregivers are often unclear in the daily practice. Assessment is recommended to establish risk and needs and standards for caregiver support are available. Still, the feasibility of applying these standards among caregivers in everyday clinical practice has not been tested so far. METHODS: This study tested the feasibility of an intervention based on key elements of the “Bereavement support standards for specialist palliative care services” in a Danish specialised palliative home care team. We followed the UK Medical Research Council’s guidelines for the process evaluation of complex interventions. The intervention consisted of: 1. Systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers at care entry; 2. Interdisciplinary conference to prepare a support plan; 3. Targeted support; 4. The establishment of an electronic medical record for caregivers to document targeted support. Outcomes included the reach, fidelity and acceptability of the intervention as well as the assessment of contextual factors. RESULTS: The intervention reached 76 of 164 caregivers (46%). The interdisciplinary risk assessment and documentation of a support plan was conducted in 57 (75%) of the enrolled caregivers. Finally, a separate medical record was established according to the intervention blueprint for 62% of caregivers receiving targeted support. After managing initial challenges, palliative care staff reported that the intervention was useful and acceptable. CONCLUSION: The intervention proved feasible and useful. Still, we identified barriers to the implementation which should be taken into consideration when planning implementation of a systematic risk and needs assessment and in the establishment of medical records for caregivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53850342017-04-12 A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care Thomsen, Kia Toft Guldin, Mai-Britt Nielsen, Mette Kjærgaard Ollars, Chaitali Laura Jensen, Anders Bonde BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Caregiving is strenuous and it may be associated with adverse psychological outcomes. During the palliative care trajectory, there are unique opportunities for providing support and preventing poor bereavement outcome. However, the tasks of palliative care staff in relation to caregivers are often unclear in the daily practice. Assessment is recommended to establish risk and needs and standards for caregiver support are available. Still, the feasibility of applying these standards among caregivers in everyday clinical practice has not been tested so far. METHODS: This study tested the feasibility of an intervention based on key elements of the “Bereavement support standards for specialist palliative care services” in a Danish specialised palliative home care team. We followed the UK Medical Research Council’s guidelines for the process evaluation of complex interventions. The intervention consisted of: 1. Systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers at care entry; 2. Interdisciplinary conference to prepare a support plan; 3. Targeted support; 4. The establishment of an electronic medical record for caregivers to document targeted support. Outcomes included the reach, fidelity and acceptability of the intervention as well as the assessment of contextual factors. RESULTS: The intervention reached 76 of 164 caregivers (46%). The interdisciplinary risk assessment and documentation of a support plan was conducted in 57 (75%) of the enrolled caregivers. Finally, a separate medical record was established according to the intervention blueprint for 62% of caregivers receiving targeted support. After managing initial challenges, palliative care staff reported that the intervention was useful and acceptable. CONCLUSION: The intervention proved feasible and useful. Still, we identified barriers to the implementation which should be taken into consideration when planning implementation of a systematic risk and needs assessment and in the establishment of medical records for caregivers. BioMed Central 2017-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5385034/ /pubmed/28390401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0196-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomsen, Kia Toft
Guldin, Mai-Britt
Nielsen, Mette Kjærgaard
Ollars, Chaitali Laura
Jensen, Anders Bonde
A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
title A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
title_full A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
title_fullStr A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
title_full_unstemmed A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
title_short A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
title_sort process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0196-x
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsenkiatoft aprocessevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT guldinmaibritt aprocessevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT nielsenmettekjærgaard aprocessevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT ollarschaitalilaura aprocessevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT jensenandersbonde aprocessevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT thomsenkiatoft processevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT guldinmaibritt processevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT nielsenmettekjærgaard processevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT ollarschaitalilaura processevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare
AT jensenandersbonde processevaluationofsystematicriskandneedsassessmentforcaregiversinspecialisedpalliativecare