Cargando…

Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia

BACKGROUND: Poor diet is the leading preventable risk factor contributing to the burden of disease in Australia. A range of cost-effective, comprehensive population-focussed strategies are available to address these dietary-related diseases. However, despite evidence of their effectiveness, minimal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cullerton, Katherine, Donnet, Timothy, Lee, Amanda, Gallegos, Danielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8
_version_ 1782520537037144064
author Cullerton, Katherine
Donnet, Timothy
Lee, Amanda
Gallegos, Danielle
author_facet Cullerton, Katherine
Donnet, Timothy
Lee, Amanda
Gallegos, Danielle
author_sort Cullerton, Katherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor diet is the leading preventable risk factor contributing to the burden of disease in Australia. A range of cost-effective, comprehensive population-focussed strategies are available to address these dietary-related diseases. However, despite evidence of their effectiveness, minimal federal resources are directed to this area. To better understand the limited public health nutrition policy action in Australia, we sought to identify the key policy brokers in the Australian nutrition policy network and consider their level of influence over nutrition policymaking. METHODS: A social network analysis involving four rounds of data collection was undertaken using a modified reputational snowball method to identify the nutrition policy network of individuals in direct contact with each other. Centrality measures, in particular betweenness centrality, and a visualisation of the network were used to identify key policy brokers. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety (390) individual actors with 1917 direct ties were identified within the Australian nutrition policy network. The network revealed two key brokers; a Nutrition Academic and a General Health professional from a non-government organisation (NGO), with the latter being in the greatest strategic position for influencing policymakers. CONCLUSION: The results of this social network analysis illustrate there are two dominant brokers within the nutrition policy network in Australia. However their structural position in the network means their brokerage roles have different purposes and different levels of influence on policymaking. The results suggest that brokerage in isolation may not adequately represent influence in nutrition policy in Australia. Other factors, such as direct access to decision–makers and the saliency of the solution, must also be considered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53850632017-04-12 Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia Cullerton, Katherine Donnet, Timothy Lee, Amanda Gallegos, Danielle BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Poor diet is the leading preventable risk factor contributing to the burden of disease in Australia. A range of cost-effective, comprehensive population-focussed strategies are available to address these dietary-related diseases. However, despite evidence of their effectiveness, minimal federal resources are directed to this area. To better understand the limited public health nutrition policy action in Australia, we sought to identify the key policy brokers in the Australian nutrition policy network and consider their level of influence over nutrition policymaking. METHODS: A social network analysis involving four rounds of data collection was undertaken using a modified reputational snowball method to identify the nutrition policy network of individuals in direct contact with each other. Centrality measures, in particular betweenness centrality, and a visualisation of the network were used to identify key policy brokers. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety (390) individual actors with 1917 direct ties were identified within the Australian nutrition policy network. The network revealed two key brokers; a Nutrition Academic and a General Health professional from a non-government organisation (NGO), with the latter being in the greatest strategic position for influencing policymakers. CONCLUSION: The results of this social network analysis illustrate there are two dominant brokers within the nutrition policy network in Australia. However their structural position in the network means their brokerage roles have different purposes and different levels of influence on policymaking. The results suggest that brokerage in isolation may not adequately represent influence in nutrition policy in Australia. Other factors, such as direct access to decision–makers and the saliency of the solution, must also be considered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5385063/ /pubmed/28390418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cullerton, Katherine
Donnet, Timothy
Lee, Amanda
Gallegos, Danielle
Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia
title Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia
title_full Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia
title_fullStr Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia
title_short Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia
title_sort joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cullertonkatherine joiningthedotstheroleofbrokersinnutritionpolicyinaustralia
AT donnettimothy joiningthedotstheroleofbrokersinnutritionpolicyinaustralia
AT leeamanda joiningthedotstheroleofbrokersinnutritionpolicyinaustralia
AT gallegosdanielle joiningthedotstheroleofbrokersinnutritionpolicyinaustralia