Cargando…

Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Women in high resource nations are increasingly delaying childbearing until their thirties. Delayed childbearing poses challenges for the spacing of a woman’s pregnancies. Inter-pregnancy intervals <12 months are associated with risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, yet increased matern...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asgharpour, Mani, Villarreal, Sofia, Schummers, Laura, Hutcheon, Jennifer, Shaw, Dorothy, Norman, Wendy V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0
_version_ 1782520543734398976
author Asgharpour, Mani
Villarreal, Sofia
Schummers, Laura
Hutcheon, Jennifer
Shaw, Dorothy
Norman, Wendy V.
author_facet Asgharpour, Mani
Villarreal, Sofia
Schummers, Laura
Hutcheon, Jennifer
Shaw, Dorothy
Norman, Wendy V.
author_sort Asgharpour, Mani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women in high resource nations are increasingly delaying childbearing until their thirties. Delayed childbearing poses challenges for the spacing of a woman’s pregnancies. Inter-pregnancy intervals <12 months are associated with risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, yet increased maternal age at delivery is linked with increased risk. The optimal inter-pregnancy interval for older mothers is uncertain. This systematic review will aim to assess the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes in women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for peer-reviewed articles on the effects of inter-pregnancy interval on perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women over 29 years at the time of first birth, in high-income countries. To assess the quality of studies, the Cochrane’s Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias will be used for randomized controlled trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa tool to assess quality of case control and cross-sectional studies. The quality of the findings on each outcome will be assessed across studies, using the GRADE approach. The decision to conduct meta-analyses will be based on the concordance in definitions used for inter-pregnancy intervals, age groups studied, or outcomes measured among selected studies. We will report odds ratios and/or relative risks and/or risk differences for different inter-pregnancy intervals and perinatal and maternal outcomes as well as pregnancy complications. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize existing data on the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. Findings will inform clinical best practices to assist mothers over age 30 to space their pregnancies appropriately. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42015019057 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53850932017-04-12 Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review Asgharpour, Mani Villarreal, Sofia Schummers, Laura Hutcheon, Jennifer Shaw, Dorothy Norman, Wendy V. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Women in high resource nations are increasingly delaying childbearing until their thirties. Delayed childbearing poses challenges for the spacing of a woman’s pregnancies. Inter-pregnancy intervals <12 months are associated with risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, yet increased maternal age at delivery is linked with increased risk. The optimal inter-pregnancy interval for older mothers is uncertain. This systematic review will aim to assess the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes in women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for peer-reviewed articles on the effects of inter-pregnancy interval on perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women over 29 years at the time of first birth, in high-income countries. To assess the quality of studies, the Cochrane’s Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias will be used for randomized controlled trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa tool to assess quality of case control and cross-sectional studies. The quality of the findings on each outcome will be assessed across studies, using the GRADE approach. The decision to conduct meta-analyses will be based on the concordance in definitions used for inter-pregnancy intervals, age groups studied, or outcomes measured among selected studies. We will report odds ratios and/or relative risks and/or risk differences for different inter-pregnancy intervals and perinatal and maternal outcomes as well as pregnancy complications. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize existing data on the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. Findings will inform clinical best practices to assist mothers over age 30 to space their pregnancies appropriately. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42015019057 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5385093/ /pubmed/28390435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Asgharpour, Mani
Villarreal, Sofia
Schummers, Laura
Hutcheon, Jennifer
Shaw, Dorothy
Norman, Wendy V.
Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
title Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0
work_keys_str_mv AT asgharpourmani interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview
AT villarrealsofia interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview
AT schummerslaura interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview
AT hutcheonjennifer interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview
AT shawdorothy interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview
AT normanwendyv interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview