Cargando…
Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Women in high resource nations are increasingly delaying childbearing until their thirties. Delayed childbearing poses challenges for the spacing of a woman’s pregnancies. Inter-pregnancy intervals <12 months are associated with risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, yet increased matern...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0 |
_version_ | 1782520543734398976 |
---|---|
author | Asgharpour, Mani Villarreal, Sofia Schummers, Laura Hutcheon, Jennifer Shaw, Dorothy Norman, Wendy V. |
author_facet | Asgharpour, Mani Villarreal, Sofia Schummers, Laura Hutcheon, Jennifer Shaw, Dorothy Norman, Wendy V. |
author_sort | Asgharpour, Mani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women in high resource nations are increasingly delaying childbearing until their thirties. Delayed childbearing poses challenges for the spacing of a woman’s pregnancies. Inter-pregnancy intervals <12 months are associated with risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, yet increased maternal age at delivery is linked with increased risk. The optimal inter-pregnancy interval for older mothers is uncertain. This systematic review will aim to assess the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes in women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for peer-reviewed articles on the effects of inter-pregnancy interval on perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women over 29 years at the time of first birth, in high-income countries. To assess the quality of studies, the Cochrane’s Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias will be used for randomized controlled trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa tool to assess quality of case control and cross-sectional studies. The quality of the findings on each outcome will be assessed across studies, using the GRADE approach. The decision to conduct meta-analyses will be based on the concordance in definitions used for inter-pregnancy intervals, age groups studied, or outcomes measured among selected studies. We will report odds ratios and/or relative risks and/or risk differences for different inter-pregnancy intervals and perinatal and maternal outcomes as well as pregnancy complications. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize existing data on the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. Findings will inform clinical best practices to assist mothers over age 30 to space their pregnancies appropriately. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42015019057 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5385093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53850932017-04-12 Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review Asgharpour, Mani Villarreal, Sofia Schummers, Laura Hutcheon, Jennifer Shaw, Dorothy Norman, Wendy V. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Women in high resource nations are increasingly delaying childbearing until their thirties. Delayed childbearing poses challenges for the spacing of a woman’s pregnancies. Inter-pregnancy intervals <12 months are associated with risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, yet increased maternal age at delivery is linked with increased risk. The optimal inter-pregnancy interval for older mothers is uncertain. This systematic review will aim to assess the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes in women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for peer-reviewed articles on the effects of inter-pregnancy interval on perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women over 29 years at the time of first birth, in high-income countries. To assess the quality of studies, the Cochrane’s Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias will be used for randomized controlled trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa tool to assess quality of case control and cross-sectional studies. The quality of the findings on each outcome will be assessed across studies, using the GRADE approach. The decision to conduct meta-analyses will be based on the concordance in definitions used for inter-pregnancy intervals, age groups studied, or outcomes measured among selected studies. We will report odds ratios and/or relative risks and/or risk differences for different inter-pregnancy intervals and perinatal and maternal outcomes as well as pregnancy complications. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize existing data on the relation between inter-pregnancy interval and perinatal and maternal health outcomes among women who delay childbearing to age 30 and older. Findings will inform clinical best practices to assist mothers over age 30 to space their pregnancies appropriately. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42015019057 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5385093/ /pubmed/28390435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Asgharpour, Mani Villarreal, Sofia Schummers, Laura Hutcheon, Jennifer Shaw, Dorothy Norman, Wendy V. Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
title | Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | inter-pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes among women with delayed childbearing: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0464-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asgharpourmani interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview AT villarrealsofia interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview AT schummerslaura interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview AT hutcheonjennifer interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview AT shawdorothy interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview AT normanwendyv interpregnancyintervalandpregnancyoutcomesamongwomenwithdelayedchildbearingprotocolforasystematicreview |