Cargando…
Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of acute chest pain in emergency department (ED), using limited resource and time, is still very difficult despite recent development of many diagnostic tools. In this study, we tried to determine the applicability of new semi-automated cardiac function analysis tool, velocity...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Echocardiography
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20 |
_version_ | 1782520574079139840 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Kyung-Hee Na, Sang-Hoon Park, Jin-Sik |
author_facet | Kim, Kyung-Hee Na, Sang-Hoon Park, Jin-Sik |
author_sort | Kim, Kyung-Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of acute chest pain in emergency department (ED), using limited resource and time, is still very difficult despite recent development of many diagnostic tools. In this study, we tried to determine the applicability of new semi-automated cardiac function analysis tool, velocity vector imaging (VVI), in the evaluation of the patients with acute chest pain in ED. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 48 patients, who visited ED with acute chest pain, and store images to analyze VVI from July 2005 to July 2007. RESULTS: In 677 of 768 segments (88%), the analysis by VVI was feasible among 48 patients. Peak systolic radial velocity (V(peak)) and strain significantly decreased according to visual regional wall motion abnormality (V(peak), 3.50 ± 1.34 cm/s for normal vs. 3.46 ± 1.52 cm/s for hypokinesia, 2.51 ± 1.26 for akinesia, p < 0.01; peak systolic radial strain -31.74 ± 9.15% fornormal, -24.33 ± 6.28% for hypokinesia, -20.30 ± 7.78% for akinesia, p < 0.01). However, the velocity vectors at the time of mitral valve opening (MVO) were directed outward in the visually normal myocardium, inward velocity vectors were revealed in the visually akinetic area (V(MVO), -0.85 ± 1.65 cm/s for normal vs. 0.10 ± 1.46 cm/s for akinesia, p < 0.001). At coronary angiography, V(MVO) clearly increased in the ischemic area (V(MVO), -0.88+1.56 cm/s for normal vs. 0.70 + 2.04 cm/s for ischemic area, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Regional wall motion assessment using VVI showed could be used to detect significant ischemia in the patient with acute chest pain at ED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5385313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society of Echocardiography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53853132017-04-11 Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department Kim, Kyung-Hee Na, Sang-Hoon Park, Jin-Sik J Cardiovasc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of acute chest pain in emergency department (ED), using limited resource and time, is still very difficult despite recent development of many diagnostic tools. In this study, we tried to determine the applicability of new semi-automated cardiac function analysis tool, velocity vector imaging (VVI), in the evaluation of the patients with acute chest pain in ED. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 48 patients, who visited ED with acute chest pain, and store images to analyze VVI from July 2005 to July 2007. RESULTS: In 677 of 768 segments (88%), the analysis by VVI was feasible among 48 patients. Peak systolic radial velocity (V(peak)) and strain significantly decreased according to visual regional wall motion abnormality (V(peak), 3.50 ± 1.34 cm/s for normal vs. 3.46 ± 1.52 cm/s for hypokinesia, 2.51 ± 1.26 for akinesia, p < 0.01; peak systolic radial strain -31.74 ± 9.15% fornormal, -24.33 ± 6.28% for hypokinesia, -20.30 ± 7.78% for akinesia, p < 0.01). However, the velocity vectors at the time of mitral valve opening (MVO) were directed outward in the visually normal myocardium, inward velocity vectors were revealed in the visually akinetic area (V(MVO), -0.85 ± 1.65 cm/s for normal vs. 0.10 ± 1.46 cm/s for akinesia, p < 0.001). At coronary angiography, V(MVO) clearly increased in the ischemic area (V(MVO), -0.88+1.56 cm/s for normal vs. 0.70 + 2.04 cm/s for ischemic area, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Regional wall motion assessment using VVI showed could be used to detect significant ischemia in the patient with acute chest pain at ED. Korean Society of Echocardiography 2017-03 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5385313/ /pubmed/28400932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Society of Echocardiography http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Kyung-Hee Na, Sang-Hoon Park, Jin-Sik Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department |
title | Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department |
title_full | Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department |
title_short | Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department |
title_sort | role of quantitative wall motion analysis in patients with acute chest pain at emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkyunghee roleofquantitativewallmotionanalysisinpatientswithacutechestpainatemergencydepartment AT nasanghoon roleofquantitativewallmotionanalysisinpatientswithacutechestpainatemergencydepartment AT parkjinsik roleofquantitativewallmotionanalysisinpatientswithacutechestpainatemergencydepartment |