Cargando…

The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report

OBJECTIVE: The vestibular implant seems feasible as a clinically useful device in the near future. However, hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine implantation remains a challenge. It should be preserved to be able to treat patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and (partially) intact hearing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Berg, Raymond, Lucieer, Florence, Guinand, Nils, van Tongeren, Joost, George, Erwin, Guyot, Jean-Philippe, Kingma, Herman, van Hoof, Marc, Temel, Yasin, van Overbeeke, Jacobus, Perez-Fornos, Angelica, Stokroos, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28443060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00137
_version_ 1782520601482625024
author van de Berg, Raymond
Lucieer, Florence
Guinand, Nils
van Tongeren, Joost
George, Erwin
Guyot, Jean-Philippe
Kingma, Herman
van Hoof, Marc
Temel, Yasin
van Overbeeke, Jacobus
Perez-Fornos, Angelica
Stokroos, Robert
author_facet van de Berg, Raymond
Lucieer, Florence
Guinand, Nils
van Tongeren, Joost
George, Erwin
Guyot, Jean-Philippe
Kingma, Herman
van Hoof, Marc
Temel, Yasin
van Overbeeke, Jacobus
Perez-Fornos, Angelica
Stokroos, Robert
author_sort van de Berg, Raymond
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The vestibular implant seems feasible as a clinically useful device in the near future. However, hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine implantation remains a challenge. It should be preserved to be able to treat patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and (partially) intact hearing. This case study investigated the feasibility of hearing preservation during the acute phase after electrode insertion in the semicircular canals. METHODS: A 40-year-old woman with normal hearing underwent a translabyrinthine approach for a vestibular schwannoma Koos Grade IV. Hearing was monitored using auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR). ABR signals were recorded synchronously to video recordings of the surgery. Following the principles of soft surgery, a conventional dummy electrode was inserted in the lateral semicircular canal for several minutes and subsequently removed. The same procedure was then applied for the posterior canal. Finally, the labyrinthectomy was completed, and the schwannoma was removed. RESULTS: Surgery was performed without complications. No leakage of endolymph and no significant reduction of ABR response were observed during insertion and after removal of the electrodes from the semicircular canals, indicting no damage to the peripheral auditory function. The ABR response significantly changed when the semicircular canals were completely opened during the labyrinthectomy. This was indicated by a change in the morphology and latency of peak V of the ABR signal. CONCLUSION: Electrode insertion in the semicircular canals is possible without acutely damaging the peripheral auditory function measured with ABR, as shown in this proof-of-principle clinical investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53854582017-04-25 The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report van de Berg, Raymond Lucieer, Florence Guinand, Nils van Tongeren, Joost George, Erwin Guyot, Jean-Philippe Kingma, Herman van Hoof, Marc Temel, Yasin van Overbeeke, Jacobus Perez-Fornos, Angelica Stokroos, Robert Front Neurol Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: The vestibular implant seems feasible as a clinically useful device in the near future. However, hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine implantation remains a challenge. It should be preserved to be able to treat patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and (partially) intact hearing. This case study investigated the feasibility of hearing preservation during the acute phase after electrode insertion in the semicircular canals. METHODS: A 40-year-old woman with normal hearing underwent a translabyrinthine approach for a vestibular schwannoma Koos Grade IV. Hearing was monitored using auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR). ABR signals were recorded synchronously to video recordings of the surgery. Following the principles of soft surgery, a conventional dummy electrode was inserted in the lateral semicircular canal for several minutes and subsequently removed. The same procedure was then applied for the posterior canal. Finally, the labyrinthectomy was completed, and the schwannoma was removed. RESULTS: Surgery was performed without complications. No leakage of endolymph and no significant reduction of ABR response were observed during insertion and after removal of the electrodes from the semicircular canals, indicting no damage to the peripheral auditory function. The ABR response significantly changed when the semicircular canals were completely opened during the labyrinthectomy. This was indicated by a change in the morphology and latency of peak V of the ABR signal. CONCLUSION: Electrode insertion in the semicircular canals is possible without acutely damaging the peripheral auditory function measured with ABR, as shown in this proof-of-principle clinical investigation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5385458/ /pubmed/28443060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00137 Text en Copyright © 2017 van de Berg, Lucieer, Guinand, van Tongeren, George, Guyot, Kingma, van Hoof, Temel, van Overbeeke, Perez-Fornos and Stokroos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
van de Berg, Raymond
Lucieer, Florence
Guinand, Nils
van Tongeren, Joost
George, Erwin
Guyot, Jean-Philippe
Kingma, Herman
van Hoof, Marc
Temel, Yasin
van Overbeeke, Jacobus
Perez-Fornos, Angelica
Stokroos, Robert
The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report
title The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report
title_full The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report
title_fullStr The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report
title_full_unstemmed The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report
title_short The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion—A Case Report
title_sort vestibular implant: hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine electrode insertion—a case report
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28443060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00137
work_keys_str_mv AT vandebergraymond thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT lucieerflorence thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT guinandnils thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vantongerenjoost thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT georgeerwin thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT guyotjeanphilippe thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT kingmaherman thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vanhoofmarc thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT temelyasin thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vanoverbeekejacobus thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT perezfornosangelica thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT stokroosrobert thevestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vandebergraymond vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT lucieerflorence vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT guinandnils vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vantongerenjoost vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT georgeerwin vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT guyotjeanphilippe vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT kingmaherman vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vanhoofmarc vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT temelyasin vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT vanoverbeekejacobus vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT perezfornosangelica vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport
AT stokroosrobert vestibularimplanthearingpreservationduringintralabyrinthineelectrodeinsertionacasereport