Cargando…

Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience

AIM OF THE STUDY: Patients with large and high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcoma are at significant risk for distant metastasis and sarcoma-related death. There is no randomized trial comparing chemoradiotherapy to radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for high risk extremity soft-tissue sarcoma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kılıç, Leyla, Ekenel, Meltem, Karabulut, Senem, Ağaoğlu, Fulya, Darendeliler, Emin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435400
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2017.66658
_version_ 1782520606140399616
author Kılıç, Leyla
Ekenel, Meltem
Karabulut, Senem
Ağaoğlu, Fulya
Darendeliler, Emin
author_facet Kılıç, Leyla
Ekenel, Meltem
Karabulut, Senem
Ağaoğlu, Fulya
Darendeliler, Emin
author_sort Kılıç, Leyla
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: Patients with large and high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcoma are at significant risk for distant metastasis and sarcoma-related death. There is no randomized trial comparing chemoradiotherapy to radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for high risk extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with two different modalities (neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone) in a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 67 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients received neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy (2–3 cycles of doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) and ifosfamide (6 g/m(2)) followed by radiotherapy of 28 Grays (Gy) administered as 8 fractions of 35 Gy) and 33 patients received radiotherapy alone. R0 resection rates and 3-year survival estimates were evaluated. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 37 months. The estimated 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the whole patient group were 79% (95% CI: 67.0–86.4) and 57.9% (95% CI: 46.3–69.0), respectively. The most common side effects were nausea and leucopenia. Three-year overall, disease-free, local recurrence-free and distant recurrence-free survival rates did not differ significantly. All patients except one underwent wide excision or compartmental resection. R0 resection rate for the whole patient group was 92.5% (n = 62). Sites of progression were similar across both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy alone or sequentially with chemotherapy result in high rates of limb salvage and acceptable toxicity. Our study results did not show a statistically significant treatment effect regarding survival and patterns of failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53854802017-04-21 Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience Kılıç, Leyla Ekenel, Meltem Karabulut, Senem Ağaoğlu, Fulya Darendeliler, Emin Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper AIM OF THE STUDY: Patients with large and high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcoma are at significant risk for distant metastasis and sarcoma-related death. There is no randomized trial comparing chemoradiotherapy to radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for high risk extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with two different modalities (neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone) in a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 67 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients received neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy (2–3 cycles of doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) and ifosfamide (6 g/m(2)) followed by radiotherapy of 28 Grays (Gy) administered as 8 fractions of 35 Gy) and 33 patients received radiotherapy alone. R0 resection rates and 3-year survival estimates were evaluated. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 37 months. The estimated 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the whole patient group were 79% (95% CI: 67.0–86.4) and 57.9% (95% CI: 46.3–69.0), respectively. The most common side effects were nausea and leucopenia. Three-year overall, disease-free, local recurrence-free and distant recurrence-free survival rates did not differ significantly. All patients except one underwent wide excision or compartmental resection. R0 resection rate for the whole patient group was 92.5% (n = 62). Sites of progression were similar across both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy alone or sequentially with chemotherapy result in high rates of limb salvage and acceptable toxicity. Our study results did not show a statistically significant treatment effect regarding survival and patterns of failure. Termedia Publishing House 2017-03-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5385480/ /pubmed/28435400 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2017.66658 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kılıç, Leyla
Ekenel, Meltem
Karabulut, Senem
Ağaoğlu, Fulya
Darendeliler, Emin
Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
title Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
title_full Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
title_short Neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
title_sort neoadjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution experience
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435400
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2017.66658
work_keys_str_mv AT kılıcleyla neoadjuvantsequentialchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefortreatmentofhighriskextremitysofttissuesarcomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT ekenelmeltem neoadjuvantsequentialchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefortreatmentofhighriskextremitysofttissuesarcomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT karabulutsenem neoadjuvantsequentialchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefortreatmentofhighriskextremitysofttissuesarcomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT agaoglufulya neoadjuvantsequentialchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefortreatmentofhighriskextremitysofttissuesarcomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT darendelileremin neoadjuvantsequentialchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefortreatmentofhighriskextremitysofttissuesarcomaasingleinstitutionexperience