Cargando…

Water availability drives gas exchange and growth of trees in northeastern US, not elevated CO(2) and reduced acid deposition

Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVM) exhibit high uncertainty about how climate change, elevated atmospheric CO(2) (atm. CO(2)) concentration, and atmospheric pollutants will impact carbon sequestration in forested ecosystems. Although the individual roles of these environmental factors on tree g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levesque, Mathieu, Andreu-Hayles, Laia, Pederson, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28393872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46158
Descripción
Sumario:Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVM) exhibit high uncertainty about how climate change, elevated atmospheric CO(2) (atm. CO(2)) concentration, and atmospheric pollutants will impact carbon sequestration in forested ecosystems. Although the individual roles of these environmental factors on tree growth are understood, analyses examining their simultaneous effects are lacking. We used tree-ring isotopic data and structural equation modeling to examine the concurrent and interacting effects of water availability, atm. CO(2) concentration, and SO(4) and nitrogen deposition on two broadleaf tree species in a temperate mesic forest in the northeastern US. Water availability was the strongest driver of gas exchange and tree growth. Wetter conditions since the 1980s have enhanced stomatal conductance, photosynthetic assimilation rates and, to a lesser extent, tree radial growth. Increased water availability seemingly overrides responses to reduced acid deposition, CO(2) fertilization, and nitrogen deposition. Our results indicate that water availability as a driver of ecosystem productivity in mesic temperate forests is not adequately represented in DGVMs, while CO(2) fertilization is likely overrepresented. This study emphasizes the importance to simultaneously consider interacting climatic and biogeochemical drivers when assessing forest responses to global environmental changes.