Cargando…
A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
AIM: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of providing brief intervention (BI) for women tobacco users in a community-based setting. METHODS: In this open-labeled randomized study, a representative sample of women (n = 100) from a community in East Delhi were screened using Alcohol, Smoking and Su...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515547 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.203121 |
_version_ | 1782520646575587328 |
---|---|
author | Jhanjee, Sonali Lal, Rakesh Mishra, Ashwami Yadav, Deepak |
author_facet | Jhanjee, Sonali Lal, Rakesh Mishra, Ashwami Yadav, Deepak |
author_sort | Jhanjee, Sonali |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of providing brief intervention (BI) for women tobacco users in a community-based setting. METHODS: In this open-labeled randomized study, a representative sample of women (n = 100) from a community in East Delhi were screened using Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Eligible women were randomized to BI or simple advice (SA) arms. At baseline, they were assessed for tobacco use characteristics and severity of nicotine dependence using Fagerstrom's test for nicotine dependence. Intervention in the form of a single session of BI or SA to quit tobacco was provided at baseline. All participants were assessed at 1 week and 3 months following intervention. The principal outcome was self-reported abstinence from tobacco use at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 43 years (standard deviation = 13). Most women were married (80%), housewives (69%), illiterate (61%), socioeconomically disadvantaged and were smokeless tobacco users (94%). The subjects in the BI group were twice more likely to stop tobacco use as compared to individuals in the SA group (odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.962–5.197, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The study results are suggestive of beneficial effect of BI. A larger study might provide more significant results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5385739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53857392017-05-17 A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India Jhanjee, Sonali Lal, Rakesh Mishra, Ashwami Yadav, Deepak Indian J Psychol Med Original Article AIM: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of providing brief intervention (BI) for women tobacco users in a community-based setting. METHODS: In this open-labeled randomized study, a representative sample of women (n = 100) from a community in East Delhi were screened using Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Eligible women were randomized to BI or simple advice (SA) arms. At baseline, they were assessed for tobacco use characteristics and severity of nicotine dependence using Fagerstrom's test for nicotine dependence. Intervention in the form of a single session of BI or SA to quit tobacco was provided at baseline. All participants were assessed at 1 week and 3 months following intervention. The principal outcome was self-reported abstinence from tobacco use at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 43 years (standard deviation = 13). Most women were married (80%), housewives (69%), illiterate (61%), socioeconomically disadvantaged and were smokeless tobacco users (94%). The subjects in the BI group were twice more likely to stop tobacco use as compared to individuals in the SA group (odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.962–5.197, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The study results are suggestive of beneficial effect of BI. A larger study might provide more significant results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5385739/ /pubmed/28515547 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.203121 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Psychiatric Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jhanjee, Sonali Lal, Rakesh Mishra, Ashwami Yadav, Deepak A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India |
title | A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India |
title_full | A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India |
title_short | A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India |
title_sort | randomized pilot study of brief intervention versus simple advice for women tobacco users in an urban community in india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515547 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.203121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhanjeesonali arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT lalrakesh arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT mishraashwami arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT yadavdeepak arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT jhanjeesonali randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT lalrakesh randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT mishraashwami randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia AT yadavdeepak randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia |