Cargando…

A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India

AIM: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of providing brief intervention (BI) for women tobacco users in a community-based setting. METHODS: In this open-labeled randomized study, a representative sample of women (n = 100) from a community in East Delhi were screened using Alcohol, Smoking and Su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jhanjee, Sonali, Lal, Rakesh, Mishra, Ashwami, Yadav, Deepak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515547
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.203121
_version_ 1782520646575587328
author Jhanjee, Sonali
Lal, Rakesh
Mishra, Ashwami
Yadav, Deepak
author_facet Jhanjee, Sonali
Lal, Rakesh
Mishra, Ashwami
Yadav, Deepak
author_sort Jhanjee, Sonali
collection PubMed
description AIM: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of providing brief intervention (BI) for women tobacco users in a community-based setting. METHODS: In this open-labeled randomized study, a representative sample of women (n = 100) from a community in East Delhi were screened using Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Eligible women were randomized to BI or simple advice (SA) arms. At baseline, they were assessed for tobacco use characteristics and severity of nicotine dependence using Fagerstrom's test for nicotine dependence. Intervention in the form of a single session of BI or SA to quit tobacco was provided at baseline. All participants were assessed at 1 week and 3 months following intervention. The principal outcome was self-reported abstinence from tobacco use at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 43 years (standard deviation = 13). Most women were married (80%), housewives (69%), illiterate (61%), socioeconomically disadvantaged and were smokeless tobacco users (94%). The subjects in the BI group were twice more likely to stop tobacco use as compared to individuals in the SA group (odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.962–5.197, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The study results are suggestive of beneficial effect of BI. A larger study might provide more significant results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53857392017-05-17 A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India Jhanjee, Sonali Lal, Rakesh Mishra, Ashwami Yadav, Deepak Indian J Psychol Med Original Article AIM: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of providing brief intervention (BI) for women tobacco users in a community-based setting. METHODS: In this open-labeled randomized study, a representative sample of women (n = 100) from a community in East Delhi were screened using Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Eligible women were randomized to BI or simple advice (SA) arms. At baseline, they were assessed for tobacco use characteristics and severity of nicotine dependence using Fagerstrom's test for nicotine dependence. Intervention in the form of a single session of BI or SA to quit tobacco was provided at baseline. All participants were assessed at 1 week and 3 months following intervention. The principal outcome was self-reported abstinence from tobacco use at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 43 years (standard deviation = 13). Most women were married (80%), housewives (69%), illiterate (61%), socioeconomically disadvantaged and were smokeless tobacco users (94%). The subjects in the BI group were twice more likely to stop tobacco use as compared to individuals in the SA group (odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.962–5.197, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The study results are suggestive of beneficial effect of BI. A larger study might provide more significant results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5385739/ /pubmed/28515547 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.203121 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Psychiatric Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jhanjee, Sonali
Lal, Rakesh
Mishra, Ashwami
Yadav, Deepak
A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
title A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
title_full A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
title_fullStr A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
title_short A Randomized Pilot Study of Brief Intervention versus Simple Advice for Women Tobacco Users in an Urban Community in India
title_sort randomized pilot study of brief intervention versus simple advice for women tobacco users in an urban community in india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515547
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.203121
work_keys_str_mv AT jhanjeesonali arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT lalrakesh arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT mishraashwami arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT yadavdeepak arandomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT jhanjeesonali randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT lalrakesh randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT mishraashwami randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia
AT yadavdeepak randomizedpilotstudyofbriefinterventionversussimpleadviceforwomentobaccousersinanurbancommunityinindia