Cargando…

Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype

Background: More and more people of all age classes have a tattoo. Intriguingly, there are multiple prejudices in the general population and published data that concern tattooed persons, such as being criminals, having a low education, being alcohol or drug abusers, or more risky in their life style...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Cornelia Sigrid Lissi, Oertel, Angela, Körner, Rebecca, Pföhler, Claudia, Vogt, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19381980.2016.1267080
_version_ 1782520706920087552
author Müller, Cornelia Sigrid Lissi
Oertel, Angela
Körner, Rebecca
Pföhler, Claudia
Vogt, Thomas
author_facet Müller, Cornelia Sigrid Lissi
Oertel, Angela
Körner, Rebecca
Pföhler, Claudia
Vogt, Thomas
author_sort Müller, Cornelia Sigrid Lissi
collection PubMed
description Background: More and more people of all age classes have a tattoo. Intriguingly, there are multiple prejudices in the general population and published data that concern tattooed persons, such as being criminals, having a low education, being alcohol or drug abusers, or more risky in their life style. Objective: To obtain and to evaluate sociodemographic data on tattooed persons, to investigate the incidence of tattoo-related cutaneous complications and to define personal risk factors and course of the persons after being tattooed concerning behavior of personal environment. Patients and Methods: We interviewed 426 participants with already existing tattoos and 20 participants just before getting a new tattoo by using an online questionnaire. The participators were asked about socio-epidemiologic aspects of tattoos in general and special aspects of their own tattoo(s) in particular. There were no exclusion criteria. Results: Tattoos are interesting for people seeking popular body art, esp. university graduates and financially-secure individuals. 446 persons participated in this study. Most of the persons were female with a mean age of 35. Local pruritus around the tattooed area was the most common cutaneous side effect among the participants. 93.5% of the participants did not want a tattoo removal. Intriguingly, most of the participants experienced no career problems related to the tattoo(s). Limitations: The study population is not representative as we included only persons being tattooed prior to or getting newly tattooed. Furthermore, there is a potential selection bias as the participation in this study was voluntary. Only persons that felt involved by the flyer did answer the questionnaire. Conclusion: The present data shows that common tattooed persons are not low educated criminals with any drug or alcohol abuse or with risky life style. Nowadays being tattooed encompasses a kind of body art and displays a certain kind of lifestyle habit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5386101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53861012017-04-12 Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype Müller, Cornelia Sigrid Lissi Oertel, Angela Körner, Rebecca Pföhler, Claudia Vogt, Thomas Dermatoendocrinol Research Paper Background: More and more people of all age classes have a tattoo. Intriguingly, there are multiple prejudices in the general population and published data that concern tattooed persons, such as being criminals, having a low education, being alcohol or drug abusers, or more risky in their life style. Objective: To obtain and to evaluate sociodemographic data on tattooed persons, to investigate the incidence of tattoo-related cutaneous complications and to define personal risk factors and course of the persons after being tattooed concerning behavior of personal environment. Patients and Methods: We interviewed 426 participants with already existing tattoos and 20 participants just before getting a new tattoo by using an online questionnaire. The participators were asked about socio-epidemiologic aspects of tattoos in general and special aspects of their own tattoo(s) in particular. There were no exclusion criteria. Results: Tattoos are interesting for people seeking popular body art, esp. university graduates and financially-secure individuals. 446 persons participated in this study. Most of the persons were female with a mean age of 35. Local pruritus around the tattooed area was the most common cutaneous side effect among the participants. 93.5% of the participants did not want a tattoo removal. Intriguingly, most of the participants experienced no career problems related to the tattoo(s). Limitations: The study population is not representative as we included only persons being tattooed prior to or getting newly tattooed. Furthermore, there is a potential selection bias as the participation in this study was voluntary. Only persons that felt involved by the flyer did answer the questionnaire. Conclusion: The present data shows that common tattooed persons are not low educated criminals with any drug or alcohol abuse or with risky life style. Nowadays being tattooed encompasses a kind of body art and displays a certain kind of lifestyle habit. Taylor & Francis 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5386101/ /pubmed/28405265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19381980.2016.1267080 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Müller, Cornelia Sigrid Lissi
Oertel, Angela
Körner, Rebecca
Pföhler, Claudia
Vogt, Thomas
Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
title Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
title_full Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
title_fullStr Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
title_full_unstemmed Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
title_short Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany – Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
title_sort socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in germany – tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19381980.2016.1267080
work_keys_str_mv AT mullercorneliasigridlissi socioepidemiologicaspectsandcutaneoussideeffectsofpermanenttattoosingermanytattoosarenotrestrictedtoaspecificsocialphenotype
AT oertelangela socioepidemiologicaspectsandcutaneoussideeffectsofpermanenttattoosingermanytattoosarenotrestrictedtoaspecificsocialphenotype
AT kornerrebecca socioepidemiologicaspectsandcutaneoussideeffectsofpermanenttattoosingermanytattoosarenotrestrictedtoaspecificsocialphenotype
AT pfohlerclaudia socioepidemiologicaspectsandcutaneoussideeffectsofpermanenttattoosingermanytattoosarenotrestrictedtoaspecificsocialphenotype
AT vogtthomas socioepidemiologicaspectsandcutaneoussideeffectsofpermanenttattoosingermanytattoosarenotrestrictedtoaspecificsocialphenotype