Cargando…

Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success

There are several methods for building prediction models. The wealth of currently available modeling techniques usually forces the researcher to judge, a priori, what will likely be the best method. Super learning (SL) is a methodology that facilitates this decision by combining all identified predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acion, Laura, Kelmansky, Diana, van der Laan, Mark, Sahker, Ethan, Jones, DeShauna, Arndt, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175383
_version_ 1782520735612272640
author Acion, Laura
Kelmansky, Diana
van der Laan, Mark
Sahker, Ethan
Jones, DeShauna
Arndt, Stephan
author_facet Acion, Laura
Kelmansky, Diana
van der Laan, Mark
Sahker, Ethan
Jones, DeShauna
Arndt, Stephan
author_sort Acion, Laura
collection PubMed
description There are several methods for building prediction models. The wealth of currently available modeling techniques usually forces the researcher to judge, a priori, what will likely be the best method. Super learning (SL) is a methodology that facilitates this decision by combining all identified prediction algorithms pertinent for a particular prediction problem. SL generates a final model that is at least as good as any of the other models considered for predicting the outcome. The overarching aim of this work is to introduce SL to analysts and practitioners. This work compares the performance of logistic regression, penalized regression, random forests, deep learning neural networks, and SL to predict successful substance use disorders (SUD) treatment. A nationwide database including 99,013 SUD treatment patients was used. All algorithms were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in a test sample that was not included in the training sample used to fit the prediction models. AUC for the models ranged between 0.793 and 0.820. SL was superior to all but one of the algorithms compared. An explanation of SL steps is provided. SL is the first step in targeted learning, an analytic framework that yields double robust effect estimation and inference with fewer assumptions than the usual parametric methods. Different aspects of SL depending on the context, its function within the targeted learning framework, and the benefits of this methodology in the addiction field are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5386258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53862582017-05-03 Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success Acion, Laura Kelmansky, Diana van der Laan, Mark Sahker, Ethan Jones, DeShauna Arndt, Stephan PLoS One Research Article There are several methods for building prediction models. The wealth of currently available modeling techniques usually forces the researcher to judge, a priori, what will likely be the best method. Super learning (SL) is a methodology that facilitates this decision by combining all identified prediction algorithms pertinent for a particular prediction problem. SL generates a final model that is at least as good as any of the other models considered for predicting the outcome. The overarching aim of this work is to introduce SL to analysts and practitioners. This work compares the performance of logistic regression, penalized regression, random forests, deep learning neural networks, and SL to predict successful substance use disorders (SUD) treatment. A nationwide database including 99,013 SUD treatment patients was used. All algorithms were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in a test sample that was not included in the training sample used to fit the prediction models. AUC for the models ranged between 0.793 and 0.820. SL was superior to all but one of the algorithms compared. An explanation of SL steps is provided. SL is the first step in targeted learning, an analytic framework that yields double robust effect estimation and inference with fewer assumptions than the usual parametric methods. Different aspects of SL depending on the context, its function within the targeted learning framework, and the benefits of this methodology in the addiction field are discussed. Public Library of Science 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5386258/ /pubmed/28394905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175383 Text en © 2017 Acion et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Acion, Laura
Kelmansky, Diana
van der Laan, Mark
Sahker, Ethan
Jones, DeShauna
Arndt, Stephan
Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
title Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
title_full Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
title_fullStr Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
title_full_unstemmed Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
title_short Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
title_sort use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175383
work_keys_str_mv AT acionlaura useofamachinelearningframeworktopredictsubstanceusedisordertreatmentsuccess
AT kelmanskydiana useofamachinelearningframeworktopredictsubstanceusedisordertreatmentsuccess
AT vanderlaanmark useofamachinelearningframeworktopredictsubstanceusedisordertreatmentsuccess
AT sahkerethan useofamachinelearningframeworktopredictsubstanceusedisordertreatmentsuccess
AT jonesdeshauna useofamachinelearningframeworktopredictsubstanceusedisordertreatmentsuccess
AT arndtstephan useofamachinelearningframeworktopredictsubstanceusedisordertreatmentsuccess