Cargando…
Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
We sought to comprehensively assess the efficacy of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. A computerized literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 1001 participants wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27901494 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13620 |
_version_ | 1782520836252499968 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Jian-Ping Xiong, Yu-Ting Fan, Zi-Qi Yan, Li-Jie Wang, Jing-Yun Gu, Ze-Juan |
author_facet | Feng, Jian-Ping Xiong, Yu-Ting Fan, Zi-Qi Yan, Li-Jie Wang, Jing-Yun Gu, Ze-Juan |
author_sort | Feng, Jian-Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | We sought to comprehensively assess the efficacy of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. A computerized literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 1001 participants were included. Compared with control, IPC significantly lowered the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk [risk ratio (RR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16 – 0.66]. The incidence of DVT in IPC and drugs group was similar (4.5% versus. 3.99%, RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.42 – 3.44). With regards to pulmonary embolism risk, no significant difference was observed in IPC versus control or IPC versus drugs. IPC had a lower postoperative transfusion rate than heparin (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32 – 0.89), but had a similar transfusion rate in operating room to low molecular weight heparin (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69 – 1.63). Combined use of IPC and graduated compression stockings (GCS) had a marginally lower risk of DVT than GCS alone (RR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.14 – 1.03). In summary, IPC is effective in reducing DVT complications in gynecologic surgery. IPC is neither superior nor inferior to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. However, whether combination of IPC and chemoprophylaxis is more effective than IPC or chemoprophylaxis alone remains unknown in this patient population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5386769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53867692017-04-26 Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Feng, Jian-Ping Xiong, Yu-Ting Fan, Zi-Qi Yan, Li-Jie Wang, Jing-Yun Gu, Ze-Juan Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper We sought to comprehensively assess the efficacy of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. A computerized literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 1001 participants were included. Compared with control, IPC significantly lowered the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk [risk ratio (RR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16 – 0.66]. The incidence of DVT in IPC and drugs group was similar (4.5% versus. 3.99%, RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.42 – 3.44). With regards to pulmonary embolism risk, no significant difference was observed in IPC versus control or IPC versus drugs. IPC had a lower postoperative transfusion rate than heparin (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32 – 0.89), but had a similar transfusion rate in operating room to low molecular weight heparin (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69 – 1.63). Combined use of IPC and graduated compression stockings (GCS) had a marginally lower risk of DVT than GCS alone (RR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.14 – 1.03). In summary, IPC is effective in reducing DVT complications in gynecologic surgery. IPC is neither superior nor inferior to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. However, whether combination of IPC and chemoprophylaxis is more effective than IPC or chemoprophylaxis alone remains unknown in this patient population. Impact Journals LLC 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5386769/ /pubmed/27901494 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13620 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Feng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Feng, Jian-Ping Xiong, Yu-Ting Fan, Zi-Qi Yan, Li-Jie Wang, Jing-Yun Gu, Ze-Juan Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27901494 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengjianping efficacyofintermittentpneumaticcompressionforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisinpatientsundergoinggynecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiongyuting efficacyofintermittentpneumaticcompressionforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisinpatientsundergoinggynecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanziqi efficacyofintermittentpneumaticcompressionforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisinpatientsundergoinggynecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanlijie efficacyofintermittentpneumaticcompressionforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisinpatientsundergoinggynecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangjingyun efficacyofintermittentpneumaticcompressionforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisinpatientsundergoinggynecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guzejuan efficacyofintermittentpneumaticcompressionforvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisinpatientsundergoinggynecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |